The coaching flipside: Factors underlying unsuccessful workplace coaching interventions and the implication for human resource development

IF 4 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Frederik Kruger, Nicky H. D. Terblanche
{"title":"The coaching flipside: Factors underlying unsuccessful workplace coaching interventions and the implication for human resource development","authors":"Frederik Kruger, Nicky H. D. Terblanche","doi":"10.1002/hrdq.21548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workplace coaching is an established, proven personal development intervention relied on by human resource (HR) practitioners to improve individual growth and organizational performance. Numerous studies underscore coaching efficacy. However, in most coaching studies, there is a bias toward positive coaching experience. This points to a missed opportunity in understanding the nuances of negative coaching experiences and its effect on HR development (HRD). To address this limitation, we identified 13 instances from a sample of 357 coachees where organizational coaching was experienced as predominantly negative. Content analysis of the interviews revealed three main themes: mismatched expectations (getting off to a bad start); suboptimal relationship dynamics (lack of trust and perceived coach incompetence); and disruptive organizational influences (hidden agendas). Findings interpreted through the lens of HRD and working alliance theories reveal deep hidden dynamics of how negative coaching experiences could destroy organizational trust, amplify cultural mismatches, and affect employee career trajectories, negatively impacting several HRD objectives on both individual and organizational levels. On a theoretical level, the findings empirically underscore the need for an extend working alliance theory that includes the organization as a distinct construct in the coach–coachee dynamics, and shows the dual positive and negative leveraging effect of coaching on HRD objectives. Practically it points to the essential need for HR practitioners to be more closely and proactively involved in organizational coaching initiatives and we offer a number of practical suggestions to help HR avoid the potential detrimental long‐term negative effects of unsuccessful coaching.","PeriodicalId":47803,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","volume":"253 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workplace coaching is an established, proven personal development intervention relied on by human resource (HR) practitioners to improve individual growth and organizational performance. Numerous studies underscore coaching efficacy. However, in most coaching studies, there is a bias toward positive coaching experience. This points to a missed opportunity in understanding the nuances of negative coaching experiences and its effect on HR development (HRD). To address this limitation, we identified 13 instances from a sample of 357 coachees where organizational coaching was experienced as predominantly negative. Content analysis of the interviews revealed three main themes: mismatched expectations (getting off to a bad start); suboptimal relationship dynamics (lack of trust and perceived coach incompetence); and disruptive organizational influences (hidden agendas). Findings interpreted through the lens of HRD and working alliance theories reveal deep hidden dynamics of how negative coaching experiences could destroy organizational trust, amplify cultural mismatches, and affect employee career trajectories, negatively impacting several HRD objectives on both individual and organizational levels. On a theoretical level, the findings empirically underscore the need for an extend working alliance theory that includes the organization as a distinct construct in the coach–coachee dynamics, and shows the dual positive and negative leveraging effect of coaching on HRD objectives. Practically it points to the essential need for HR practitioners to be more closely and proactively involved in organizational coaching initiatives and we offer a number of practical suggestions to help HR avoid the potential detrimental long‐term negative effects of unsuccessful coaching.
辅导的反面:工作场所教练干预不成功的根本原因及其对人力资源开发的影响
工作场所辅导是一种成熟的、行之有效的个人发展干预措施,人力资源(HR)从业人员依靠它来改善个人成长和组织绩效。许多研究都强调了教练的功效。然而,在大多数教练研究中,人们倾向于积极的教练经验。这表明,在了解负面教练经验的细微差别及其对人力资源开发(HRD)的影响方面,我们错失了良机。为了解决这一局限性,我们从 357 位辅导者的样本中找出了 13 个组织辅导经历以负面为主的实例。对访谈内容的分析揭示了三大主题:不匹配的期望(开局不利);不理想的关系动态(缺乏信任和认为教练无能);以及破坏性的组织影响(隐藏的议程)。通过人力资源开发和工作联盟理论的视角解读研究结果,可以发现消极的教练经历是如何破坏组织信任、放大文化不匹配、影响员工职业发展轨迹,从而对个人和组织层面的多项人力资源开发目标产生负面影响的。在理论层面上,研究结果从经验角度强调了扩展工作联盟理论的必要性,该理论将组织作为教练-被教练者动态关系中的一个独特结构,并显示了教练对人力资源开发目标的正负双重杠杆效应。在实践中,它指出人力资源从业人员必须更密切、更积极地参与组织教练计划,我们还提出了一些实用建议,以帮助人力资源部门避免不成功的教练可能产生的有害的长期负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Human Resource Development Quarterly (HRDQ) is the first scholarly journal focused directly on the evolving field of human resource development (HRD). It provides a central focus for research on human resource development issues as well as the means for disseminating such research. HRDQ recognizes the interdisciplinary nature of the HRD field and brings together relevant research from the related fields, such as economics, education, management, sociology, and psychology. It provides an important link in the application of theory and research to HRD practice. HRDQ publishes scholarly work that addresses the theoretical foundations of HRD, HRD research, and evaluation of HRD interventions and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信