Interactions with educational chatbots: the impact of induced emotions and students’ learning motivation

IF 8.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jiaqi Yin, Tiong-Thye Goh, Yi Hu
{"title":"Interactions with educational chatbots: the impact of induced emotions and students’ learning motivation","authors":"Jiaqi Yin, Tiong-Thye Goh, Yi Hu","doi":"10.1186/s41239-024-00480-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Educational chatbots (EC) have shown their promise in providing instructional support. However, limited studies directly explored the impact of EC on learners’ emotional responses. This study investigated the induced emotions from interacting with micro-learning EC and how they impact learning motivation. In this context, the EC interactions encompassed greetings, biology learning content delivery, self-evaluation, and feedback. This study employed a between-subject experimental design involving 62 college students. Participants were randomly assigned to either the Metacognitive EC group, receiving metacognitive feedback, or the Neutral EC group, receiving neutral feedback. The results of T-tests demonstrated significant differences in specific induced emotions between the two groups while some similarities exist. Importantly, it unveiled that both Metacognitive EC and Neutral EC interactions evoked a spectrum of positive, negative, and ambivalent emotions, in which positive emotions surpassed the induced negative emotions. In general, metacognitive feedback induced fewer negative emotions than neutral feedback. PLS analysis supported the relationships between induced emotions and intrinsic motivation, with positive emotion, ambivalent emotions, and negative emotions influencing interest motivation, which, in turn, shaped other motivational components, including perceived competence, perceived value, and perceived pressure. However, the influence of positive emotion on interest was weaker in the Metacognitive than in the Neutral EC. In conclusion, the study revealed how induced emotions impact motivations and showed that the presence of metacognitive feedback reduced negative emotions and promoted motivation. These findings highlight the need for positive emotion element design and appropriate feedback that will impact learning motivations during educational chatbot interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13871,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00480-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational chatbots (EC) have shown their promise in providing instructional support. However, limited studies directly explored the impact of EC on learners’ emotional responses. This study investigated the induced emotions from interacting with micro-learning EC and how they impact learning motivation. In this context, the EC interactions encompassed greetings, biology learning content delivery, self-evaluation, and feedback. This study employed a between-subject experimental design involving 62 college students. Participants were randomly assigned to either the Metacognitive EC group, receiving metacognitive feedback, or the Neutral EC group, receiving neutral feedback. The results of T-tests demonstrated significant differences in specific induced emotions between the two groups while some similarities exist. Importantly, it unveiled that both Metacognitive EC and Neutral EC interactions evoked a spectrum of positive, negative, and ambivalent emotions, in which positive emotions surpassed the induced negative emotions. In general, metacognitive feedback induced fewer negative emotions than neutral feedback. PLS analysis supported the relationships between induced emotions and intrinsic motivation, with positive emotion, ambivalent emotions, and negative emotions influencing interest motivation, which, in turn, shaped other motivational components, including perceived competence, perceived value, and perceived pressure. However, the influence of positive emotion on interest was weaker in the Metacognitive than in the Neutral EC. In conclusion, the study revealed how induced emotions impact motivations and showed that the presence of metacognitive feedback reduced negative emotions and promoted motivation. These findings highlight the need for positive emotion element design and appropriate feedback that will impact learning motivations during educational chatbot interactions.

Abstract Image

与教育聊天机器人的互动:诱导情绪和学生学习动机的影响
教育聊天机器人(EC)在提供教学支持方面大有可为。然而,直接探讨教育聊天机器人对学习者情绪反应的影响的研究还很有限。本研究调查了与微型学习聊天机器人互动时诱发的情绪,以及这些情绪如何影响学习动机。在这种情况下,EC 互动包括问候、生物学习内容交付、自我评价和反馈。本研究采用了主体间实验设计,共有 62 名大学生参与。参与者被随机分配到元认知EC组(接受元认知反馈)或中立EC组(接受中立反馈)。T 检验结果表明,两组在特定诱发情绪方面存在显著差异,但也有一些相似之处。重要的是,元认知反馈和中性反馈都能唤起积极、消极和矛盾的情绪,其中积极情绪超过了消极情绪。总体而言,元认知反馈比中性反馈诱发的负面情绪更少。PLS 分析支持诱导情绪与内在动机之间的关系,积极情绪、矛盾情绪和消极情绪影响兴趣动机,而兴趣动机又影响其他动机成分,包括感知能力、感知价值和感知压力。然而,积极情绪对兴趣的影响在 "元认知 "EC中弱于 "中性EC"。总之,这项研究揭示了诱导情绪如何影响学习动机,并表明元认知反馈的存在能减少消极情绪,促进学习动机。这些发现突出表明,在教育聊天机器人交互过程中,积极情绪元素设计和适当的反馈将影响学习动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
59
审稿时长
76.7 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks to foster the sharing of critical scholarly works and information exchange across diverse cultural perspectives in the fields of technology-enhanced and digital learning in higher education. It aims to advance scientific knowledge on the human and personal aspects of technology use in higher education, while keeping readers informed about the latest developments in applying digital technologies to learning, training, research, and management.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信