A systematic review to evaluate the risk of bias of meta-analyses reporting experimental educational interventions focused on academic performance

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Cogent Education Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2385785

Micaela Sánchez-Martín, Marta Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Eva María Olmedo-Moreno, Fernando Navarro-Mateu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns about the risk of bias (RoB) of Meta-analysis (MAs) have grown in parallel with the exponential increase in the number of publications in science. However, this has not been properly asses...

查看原文本刊更多论文

通过系统回顾，评估报告以学业成绩为重点的实验性教育干预措施的荟萃分析存在偏差的风险

随着科学出版物数量的指数级增长，人们对元分析（MA）的偏倚风险（RoB）也越来越关注。然而，这种担忧并没有得到适当的评估。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cogent Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

6.20%

发文量

197

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Part of the Taylor & Francis / Routledge Group, Cogent Education is a leading multidisciplinary open access journal, publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed articles across the breadth of educational research. All articles are free to access across the globe, allowing authors to share their research and maximise its impact. Cogent Education is led by Editor-in-Chief Professor John C.K. Lee (The Education University of Hong Kong), supported by an expert international Editorial Board. Our academic editors take an objective and constructive approach to peer review, ensuring each manuscript is evaluated on its own scholarly merits and research integrity. Article-level metrics let the research speak for itself. Cogent Education also presents collections that publish the latest studies on key topics and discussion within the education community based on research projects and conferences.