Fang Jin , Sjoerd M. Bruijn , Andreas Daffertshofer
{"title":"Machine learning approaches to predict whether MEPs can be elicited via TMS","authors":"Fang Jin , Sjoerd M. Bruijn , Andreas Daffertshofer","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a valuable technique for assessing the function of the motor cortex and cortico-muscular pathways. TMS activates the motoneurons in the cortex, which after transmission along cortico-muscular pathways can be measured as motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). The position and orientation of the TMS coil and the intensity used to deliver a TMS pulse are considered central TMS setup parameters influencing the presence/absence of MEPs.</p></div><div><h3>New method</h3><p>We sought to predict the presence of MEPs from TMS setup parameters using machine learning. We trained different machine learners using either within-subject or between-subject designs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We obtained prediction accuracies of on average 77 % and 65 % with maxima up to up to 90 % and 72 % within and between subjects, respectively. Across the board, a bagging ensemble appeared to be the most suitable approach to predict the presence of MEPs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although within a subject the prediction of MEPs via TMS setup parameter-based machine learning might be feasible, the limited accuracy between subjects suggests that the transfer of this approach to experimental or clinical research comes with significant challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"410 ","pages":"Article 110242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027024001870/pdfft?md5=66a40e55edad1daf20c42544f140f858&pid=1-s2.0-S0165027024001870-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027024001870","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a valuable technique for assessing the function of the motor cortex and cortico-muscular pathways. TMS activates the motoneurons in the cortex, which after transmission along cortico-muscular pathways can be measured as motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). The position and orientation of the TMS coil and the intensity used to deliver a TMS pulse are considered central TMS setup parameters influencing the presence/absence of MEPs.
New method
We sought to predict the presence of MEPs from TMS setup parameters using machine learning. We trained different machine learners using either within-subject or between-subject designs.
Results
We obtained prediction accuracies of on average 77 % and 65 % with maxima up to up to 90 % and 72 % within and between subjects, respectively. Across the board, a bagging ensemble appeared to be the most suitable approach to predict the presence of MEPs.
Conclusions
Although within a subject the prediction of MEPs via TMS setup parameter-based machine learning might be feasible, the limited accuracy between subjects suggests that the transfer of this approach to experimental or clinical research comes with significant challenges.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.