Mortality Convergence in Europe? Spatial Differences in Life Expectancy Gains Between 1995 and 2019

IF 4.6 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Markus Sauerberg, Florian Bonnet, Carlo Giovanni Camarda, Pavel Grigoriev
{"title":"Mortality Convergence in Europe? Spatial Differences in Life Expectancy Gains Between 1995 and 2019","authors":"Markus Sauerberg, Florian Bonnet, Carlo Giovanni Camarda, Pavel Grigoriev","doi":"10.1111/padr.12657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional approach to gauging mortality convergence in Europe relies on life expectancy estimates () at the national level. However, mortality can differ within countries significantly. To better apprehend whether Europe's mortality patterns have been converging or diverging over recent decades, we must shift our focus to regional mortality data. Using data from statistical offices, we present annual estimates for 420 regions in 16 EU countries from 1995 to 2019. In our empirical analysis, we examined whether regions with initially high mortality levels caught up with low‐mortality regions, and we investigated changes in the standard deviation of Europe's regional distribution over time. Indeed, mortality variation has generally decreased from 1995 to 2019 due to larger gains in for regions with initially high mortality levels. The convergence phase took place mostly during the first half of the entire time period analyzed. Over more recent periods, however, we observe more heterogeneity in the development of . Some advantaged regions realized further gains in , even as improvements slowed for more disadvantaged regions. In conclusion, our analysis underscores the importance of addressing widening health inequalities. Policies should target disadvantaged regions to retard mortality divergence across Europe.","PeriodicalId":51372,"journal":{"name":"Population and Development Review","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population and Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional approach to gauging mortality convergence in Europe relies on life expectancy estimates () at the national level. However, mortality can differ within countries significantly. To better apprehend whether Europe's mortality patterns have been converging or diverging over recent decades, we must shift our focus to regional mortality data. Using data from statistical offices, we present annual estimates for 420 regions in 16 EU countries from 1995 to 2019. In our empirical analysis, we examined whether regions with initially high mortality levels caught up with low‐mortality regions, and we investigated changes in the standard deviation of Europe's regional distribution over time. Indeed, mortality variation has generally decreased from 1995 to 2019 due to larger gains in for regions with initially high mortality levels. The convergence phase took place mostly during the first half of the entire time period analyzed. Over more recent periods, however, we observe more heterogeneity in the development of . Some advantaged regions realized further gains in , even as improvements slowed for more disadvantaged regions. In conclusion, our analysis underscores the importance of addressing widening health inequalities. Policies should target disadvantaged regions to retard mortality divergence across Europe.
欧洲死亡率趋同?1995 至 2019 年间预期寿命增长的空间差异
衡量欧洲死亡率趋同的传统方法依赖于国家一级的预期寿命估计值()。然而,各国内部的死亡率可能存在很大差异。为了更好地了解近几十年来欧洲的死亡率模式是趋同还是分化,我们必须将重点转移到地区死亡率数据上。利用统计局的数据,我们提供了 1995 年至 2019 年 16 个欧盟国家 420 个地区的年度估计数据。在实证分析中,我们考察了最初死亡率水平较高的地区是否赶上了死亡率较低的地区,并研究了欧洲地区分布的标准差随时间的变化。事实上,从 1995 年到 2019 年,死亡率的差异普遍缩小,这是因为最初死亡率高的地区取得了更大的进步。趋同阶段主要发生在整个分析时间段的前半段。然而,在最近一段时期,我们观察到死亡率的发展出现了更多的异质性。 一些优势地区在死亡率方面取得了进一步的进展,而一些劣势地区的进展则有所放缓。总之,我们的分析强调了解决日益扩大的健康不平等问题的重要性。应针对弱势地区制定政策,以延缓整个欧洲的死亡率差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Population and Development Review is essential reading to keep abreast of population studies, research on the interrelationships between population and socioeconomic change, and related thinking on public policy. Its interests span both developed and developing countries, theoretical advances as well as empirical analyses and case studies, a broad range of disciplinary approaches, and concern with historical as well as present-day problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信