{"title":"Learning analytics dashboard-based self-regulated learning approach for enhancing students’ e-book-based blended learning","authors":"Christopher C. Y. Yang, Jiun-Yu Wu, Hiroaki Ogata","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12913-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Blended learning (BL) combines traditional classroom activities with online learning resources, enabling students to obtain higher academic performance through well-defined interactive learning strategies. However, lacking the capacity to self-regulate their learning, many students might fail to comprehensively study the learning materials after face-to-face learning. In this study, a learning analytics dashboard (LAD)-based self-regulated learning (SRL) approach is proposed to enhance the students’ practices of SRL in an e-book-based BL environment. The proposed approach aims to support students to precisely reflect on their face-to-face e-book reading activities, effectively review the e-book learning materials after the face-to-face learning sessions, and, finally, set new goals for their next face-to-face learning session by using a LAD. To evaluate the effects of the proposed approach, a quasi-experimental design was deployed in a university-level course that adopted a BL model. The experimental group learned through the proposed approach using an e-book and the LAD, whereas the control group learned using the conventional BL approach using only the e-book. The results of the one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and Mann–Whitney U test demonstrate a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i>-value less than 0.01) between both groups in terms of students’ learning outcomes, awareness of SRL, self-efficacy (SE), and e-book reading engagements. This provides educators with evidence of the effectiveness of an explicit SRL approach in BL, which not only improves student learning outcomes from the given course and awareness of self-regulation and SE but also increases course engagement compared to students who learn with conventional BL approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12913-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Blended learning (BL) combines traditional classroom activities with online learning resources, enabling students to obtain higher academic performance through well-defined interactive learning strategies. However, lacking the capacity to self-regulate their learning, many students might fail to comprehensively study the learning materials after face-to-face learning. In this study, a learning analytics dashboard (LAD)-based self-regulated learning (SRL) approach is proposed to enhance the students’ practices of SRL in an e-book-based BL environment. The proposed approach aims to support students to precisely reflect on their face-to-face e-book reading activities, effectively review the e-book learning materials after the face-to-face learning sessions, and, finally, set new goals for their next face-to-face learning session by using a LAD. To evaluate the effects of the proposed approach, a quasi-experimental design was deployed in a university-level course that adopted a BL model. The experimental group learned through the proposed approach using an e-book and the LAD, whereas the control group learned using the conventional BL approach using only the e-book. The results of the one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and Mann–Whitney U test demonstrate a statistically significant difference (p-value less than 0.01) between both groups in terms of students’ learning outcomes, awareness of SRL, self-efficacy (SE), and e-book reading engagements. This provides educators with evidence of the effectiveness of an explicit SRL approach in BL, which not only improves student learning outcomes from the given course and awareness of self-regulation and SE but also increases course engagement compared to students who learn with conventional BL approaches.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments.
The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts. The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.