Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-07-01
Alan D Kaye, Jonathan S Okereke, Cameron A Howe, Angela Nguyen, Charles P Daniel, Grant E Borne, Brook Girma, Varsha Allampalli, Sahar Shekoohi, Brian Bernhardt, Azem A Chami
{"title":"Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Study.","authors":"Alan D Kaye, Jonathan S Okereke, Cameron A Howe, Angela Nguyen, Charles P Daniel, Grant E Borne, Brook Girma, Varsha Allampalli, Sahar Shekoohi, Brian Bernhardt, Azem A Chami","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic sacroiliitis has variable etiologies with numerous treatments of varying efficacy. In recent years, a novel posterior approach utilizing bone matrix has been developed although to date, there is limited data in the literature regarding efficacy and safety through this approach. Benefits described include reduced adverse outcomes and quicker recovery when compared to the lateral approach.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present investigation focused on sacroiliac joint fusion through the posterior approach and outcomes including disability, pain, and use of analgesics post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study was conducted evaluating safety and efficacy of sacroiliac fusion allograft implants (LinQ Implant System from PainTEQ; PsiF System from Omnia Medical).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 72 posterior approach sacroiliac joint fusions were performed. Fifty-three individuals were enrolled and followed at LSU Health Shreveport as the sole investigational site between August 2020 and June 2024. Selected participant age ranged between 28 and 79 years, with a mean age of 53.4 years. The LinQ Implant System was the primary surgical hardware selected for implantation (83.0%), with the PsiF System chosen in the remaining cases.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>VAS Scores, disability changes, adverse outcomes, and analgesic use were compared after sacroiliac joint fusion via the posterior approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean VAS Scores for SIJ Pain Intensity significantly decreased by 3.6 cm from a baseline score of 9.5 cm by the Specified End (June 1st, 2024). In this regard, 65.4% of patients experienced a 20% or greater improvement in pain, 38.5% of patients experienced a 50% or greater improvement in pain, and 26.9% of patients experienced a 70% or greater improvement in pain.  Zero (0) procedure-related adverse events nor intra- or post-operative complications occurred throughout the duration of the investigation.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective nature of the study without a control group. Fifty-four percent (39 of 72) completed minimum one year follow up. Further, the withdrawal rate was 26%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the present investigation demonstrated effective outcomes with minimal adverse effects and improvements in disability over a three-year period in the largest single center study to date involving posterior approach sacroiliac joint fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"27 5","pages":"321-331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic sacroiliitis has variable etiologies with numerous treatments of varying efficacy. In recent years, a novel posterior approach utilizing bone matrix has been developed although to date, there is limited data in the literature regarding efficacy and safety through this approach. Benefits described include reduced adverse outcomes and quicker recovery when compared to the lateral approach.

Objective: The present investigation focused on sacroiliac joint fusion through the posterior approach and outcomes including disability, pain, and use of analgesics post-surgery.

Study design: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted evaluating safety and efficacy of sacroiliac fusion allograft implants (LinQ Implant System from PainTEQ; PsiF System from Omnia Medical).

Methods: A total of 72 posterior approach sacroiliac joint fusions were performed. Fifty-three individuals were enrolled and followed at LSU Health Shreveport as the sole investigational site between August 2020 and June 2024. Selected participant age ranged between 28 and 79 years, with a mean age of 53.4 years. The LinQ Implant System was the primary surgical hardware selected for implantation (83.0%), with the PsiF System chosen in the remaining cases.

Outcome measures: VAS Scores, disability changes, adverse outcomes, and analgesic use were compared after sacroiliac joint fusion via the posterior approach.

Results: Mean VAS Scores for SIJ Pain Intensity significantly decreased by 3.6 cm from a baseline score of 9.5 cm by the Specified End (June 1st, 2024). In this regard, 65.4% of patients experienced a 20% or greater improvement in pain, 38.5% of patients experienced a 50% or greater improvement in pain, and 26.9% of patients experienced a 70% or greater improvement in pain.  Zero (0) procedure-related adverse events nor intra- or post-operative complications occurred throughout the duration of the investigation.

Limitations: Retrospective nature of the study without a control group. Fifty-four percent (39 of 72) completed minimum one year follow up. Further, the withdrawal rate was 26%.

Conclusion: The results of the present investigation demonstrated effective outcomes with minimal adverse effects and improvements in disability over a three-year period in the largest single center study to date involving posterior approach sacroiliac joint fusion.

骶髂关节后融合手术:单中心回顾性研究
背景:慢性骶髂关节炎的病因多种多样,治疗方法也不尽相同,疗效也参差不齐。近年来,一种利用骨基质的新型后路治疗方法应运而生,但迄今为止,有关这种方法的疗效和安全性的文献数据十分有限。与侧位方法相比,这种方法的优点包括减少不良后果和更快恢复:本次调查的重点是通过后侧入路进行骶髂关节融合术的效果,包括残疾、疼痛和术后镇痛药的使用情况:这项回顾性单中心研究评估了骶髂融合同种异体植入物(PainTEQ公司的LinQ植入系统;Omnia Medical公司的PsiF系统)的安全性和有效性:共进行了 72 例后入路骶髂关节融合术。2020年8月至2024年6月期间,53名患者在作为唯一研究地点的路易斯安那州立大学什里夫波特分校(LSU Health Shreveport)注册并接受随访。入选者年龄介于 28 岁至 79 岁之间,平均年龄为 53.4 岁。LinQ植入系统是选择植入的主要手术硬件(83.0%),其余病例选择了PsiF系统:结果:骶髂关节融合术后的VAS评分、残疾变化、不良后果和镇痛剂使用情况进行了比较:结果:到指定期限(2024 年 6 月 1 日),骶髂关节疼痛强度的平均 VAS 评分从基线评分 9.5 厘米显著下降了 3.6 厘米。在这方面,65.4% 的患者疼痛改善了 20% 或更多,38.5% 的患者疼痛改善了 50% 或更多,26.9% 的患者疼痛改善了 70% 或更多。 在整个调查过程中,与手术相关的不良事件、术中或术后并发症均为零:研究具有回顾性,没有对照组。54%的患者(72 例中的 39 例)完成了至少一年的随访。此外,退出率为 26%:本研究的结果表明,后路骶髂关节融合术是迄今为止规模最大的单中心研究,在为期三年的时间里,手术效果显著,不良反应极小,残疾情况也有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信