Estimation of botanical composition of forage crops using laboratory-based hyperspectral imaging and near-infrared spectrometer measurements

IF 4.8 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Junxiang Peng , Maryam Rahimi Jahangirlou , Julien Morel , Zhenjiang Zhou , David Parsons
{"title":"Estimation of botanical composition of forage crops using laboratory-based hyperspectral imaging and near-infrared spectrometer measurements","authors":"Junxiang Peng ,&nbsp;Maryam Rahimi Jahangirlou ,&nbsp;Julien Morel ,&nbsp;Zhenjiang Zhou ,&nbsp;David Parsons","doi":"10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Harvested forage is the main raw feed for ruminant animals in Sweden, and is commonly cultivated in mixed stands of legume and grass species. The fraction of legume on a dry matter basis, known as botanical composition (BC) is a very important indicator of forage quality. In this study, hyperspectral imaging and near-infrared spectrometer (NIRS) based methods were used to estimate BC, to overcome the shortcomings of hand separation, which is time and resource consuming. Timothy and red clover mix samples were collected from different harvests in 2017–2019 from multiple sites in Northern Sweden and hand separated. The samples were synthetically mixed to 11 different BC levels, i.e., 0–100 % clover content. Two different instruments (Specim shortwave infrared (SWIR) hyperspectral imaging system and Foss 6500 spectrometer) were used to collect spectral data of samples milled to two levels of coarseness. Three different regression analyses: partial least squares regression (PLSR), support vector regression (SVR) and random forest regression (RFR), were used to build BC estimation models. The effects of the milling particle sizes and the different instruments on the performances of the models were compared. The data from second harvest in 2019 were used for independent validation as evaluation, and the rest of data were randomly split for model calibration (75 %) and validation (25 %). The models were iteratively run 1000 times with different splits, to check the effect from the splitting of calibration and validation datasets. Among different regression analyses, PLSR performed best, with mean Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (<em>NSE</em>) for model evaluation from 0.76 to 0.87, varying for different instruments and milling sizes. Finer milling made the model accuracies slightly higher. This study developed quick and robust methods to determine the BC of timothy grass and red clover mixtures, which can provide useful information for farmers or researchers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 101319"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154324003569/pdfft?md5=98ee887924b27be1ddc8cf3a60ccb186&pid=1-s2.0-S2666154324003569-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154324003569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Harvested forage is the main raw feed for ruminant animals in Sweden, and is commonly cultivated in mixed stands of legume and grass species. The fraction of legume on a dry matter basis, known as botanical composition (BC) is a very important indicator of forage quality. In this study, hyperspectral imaging and near-infrared spectrometer (NIRS) based methods were used to estimate BC, to overcome the shortcomings of hand separation, which is time and resource consuming. Timothy and red clover mix samples were collected from different harvests in 2017–2019 from multiple sites in Northern Sweden and hand separated. The samples were synthetically mixed to 11 different BC levels, i.e., 0–100 % clover content. Two different instruments (Specim shortwave infrared (SWIR) hyperspectral imaging system and Foss 6500 spectrometer) were used to collect spectral data of samples milled to two levels of coarseness. Three different regression analyses: partial least squares regression (PLSR), support vector regression (SVR) and random forest regression (RFR), were used to build BC estimation models. The effects of the milling particle sizes and the different instruments on the performances of the models were compared. The data from second harvest in 2019 were used for independent validation as evaluation, and the rest of data were randomly split for model calibration (75 %) and validation (25 %). The models were iteratively run 1000 times with different splits, to check the effect from the splitting of calibration and validation datasets. Among different regression analyses, PLSR performed best, with mean Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) for model evaluation from 0.76 to 0.87, varying for different instruments and milling sizes. Finer milling made the model accuracies slightly higher. This study developed quick and robust methods to determine the BC of timothy grass and red clover mixtures, which can provide useful information for farmers or researchers.

Abstract Image

利用实验室高光谱成像和近红外光谱仪测量估算饲料作物的植物成分
收割的牧草是瑞典反刍动物的主要饲料,通常是豆科植物和禾本科植物混合种植。豆科植物的干物质含量,即植物成分(BC),是衡量饲草质量的一个非常重要的指标。本研究采用基于高光谱成像和近红外光谱仪(NIRS)的方法来估算植物成分,以克服手工分离耗时耗力的缺点。从瑞典北部多个地点采集了2017-2019年不同收获期的提摩西和红三叶草混合样本,并进行了人工分离。样品被合成混合到 11 种不同的 BC 水平,即 0-100 % 的三叶草含量。使用两种不同的仪器(Specim 短波红外(SWIR)高光谱成像系统和 Foss 6500 光谱仪)收集碾磨成两种粗度的样品的光谱数据。使用三种不同的回归分析方法:偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)、支持向量回归(SVR)和随机森林回归(RFR)来建立萃取估算模型。比较了碾磨粒度和不同工具对模型性能的影响。2019年第二次收获的数据用于独立验证评估,其余数据随机分配用于模型校准(75%)和验证(25%)。模型在不同的分割条件下迭代运行 1000 次,以检查校准和验证数据集分割的影响。在不同的回归分析中,PLSR 的表现最好,模型评估的平均纳什-苏特克利夫效率(NSE)从 0.76 到 0.87 不等,不同的仪器和研磨尺寸也有不同。更精细的铣削使模型精确度略高。这项研究开发了快速、稳健的方法来确定梯牧草和红三叶草混合物的萃取率,可为农民或研究人员提供有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
193
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信