Real‐world use of emicizumab in Chinese children with hemophilia A: Retrospective data from a comprehensive care center

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Qianqian Mao, Zhenping Chen, Guoqing Liu, Gang Li, Y. Zhen, Xiaoling Cheng, Zekun Li, W. Yao, Di Ai, Zhengping Li, Nan Wang, Man-Chiu Poon, Runhui Wu
{"title":"Real‐world use of emicizumab in Chinese children with hemophilia A: Retrospective data from a comprehensive care center","authors":"Qianqian Mao, Zhenping Chen, Guoqing Liu, Gang Li, Y. Zhen, Xiaoling Cheng, Zekun Li, W. Yao, Di Ai, Zhengping Li, Nan Wang, Man-Chiu Poon, Runhui Wu","doi":"10.1002/ped4.12439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emicizumab (EMI) is efficacious and safe for hemophilia A (HA) prophylaxis. However, its high cost poses a challenge in China.To explore the possibility of using reduced‐dosage EMI in Chinese HA children.We conducted a retrospective study for HA children in our Comprehensive Care Center. Data were collected pre‐ and post‐EMI treatment to evaluate bleeding rates. Laboratory analyses included factor VIII (FVIII)‐like activity and EMI concentration measurements.Thirty‐four HA children receiving EMI prophylaxis for a median (range) 24.5 (2.5–47.9) months by June 2023. Of these, 25 (73.5%) were under 3 years of age, 26 (76.5%) had severe hemophilia and 12 (35.3%) were minimally treated or previously untreated patients. Thirty‐one (91.2%) of the 34 patients received reduced‐dosage EMI for economic reasons. EMI concentration and FVIII‐like activity measured showed a strong correlation. Overall, while on EMI, their annual treated bleeding rate (ATBR) and annual bleeding rate (ABR) decreased significantly (2–0) while their zero‐bleeding rate (ZBR) increased significantly (11.5%–65.4%). After 6 months of EMI, there was no significant difference in ATBR and ABR among various maintenance dosages. However, ZBR was significantly lower in dosages under 4 mg/kg (P = 0.0156). Receiver operator characteristic curves suggested the following cutoff values for zero bleeding: EMI 4‐weekly maintenance dosage 3.8 mg/kg, EMI concentration 48.1 μg/mL, and FVIII‐like activity 15.4 IU/dL.We showed EMI effectively prevented bleeding even at reduced dosages. However, the bleeding risk may be higher with EMI 4‐weekly maintenance dosage <3.8 mg/kg, EMI concentration <48.1 μg/mL, and FVIII‐like activity <15.4 IU/dL for zero bleeding. It is important that dosage reduction be done rationally. Dosage tailoring is possible.","PeriodicalId":19992,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emicizumab (EMI) is efficacious and safe for hemophilia A (HA) prophylaxis. However, its high cost poses a challenge in China.To explore the possibility of using reduced‐dosage EMI in Chinese HA children.We conducted a retrospective study for HA children in our Comprehensive Care Center. Data were collected pre‐ and post‐EMI treatment to evaluate bleeding rates. Laboratory analyses included factor VIII (FVIII)‐like activity and EMI concentration measurements.Thirty‐four HA children receiving EMI prophylaxis for a median (range) 24.5 (2.5–47.9) months by June 2023. Of these, 25 (73.5%) were under 3 years of age, 26 (76.5%) had severe hemophilia and 12 (35.3%) were minimally treated or previously untreated patients. Thirty‐one (91.2%) of the 34 patients received reduced‐dosage EMI for economic reasons. EMI concentration and FVIII‐like activity measured showed a strong correlation. Overall, while on EMI, their annual treated bleeding rate (ATBR) and annual bleeding rate (ABR) decreased significantly (2–0) while their zero‐bleeding rate (ZBR) increased significantly (11.5%–65.4%). After 6 months of EMI, there was no significant difference in ATBR and ABR among various maintenance dosages. However, ZBR was significantly lower in dosages under 4 mg/kg (P = 0.0156). Receiver operator characteristic curves suggested the following cutoff values for zero bleeding: EMI 4‐weekly maintenance dosage 3.8 mg/kg, EMI concentration 48.1 μg/mL, and FVIII‐like activity 15.4 IU/dL.We showed EMI effectively prevented bleeding even at reduced dosages. However, the bleeding risk may be higher with EMI 4‐weekly maintenance dosage <3.8 mg/kg, EMI concentration <48.1 μg/mL, and FVIII‐like activity <15.4 IU/dL for zero bleeding. It is important that dosage reduction be done rationally. Dosage tailoring is possible.
埃米珠单抗在中国A型血友病患儿中的实际应用:来自一家综合医疗中心的回顾性数据
埃米珠单抗(Emicizumab,EMI)用于甲型血友病(HA)的预防治疗既有效又安全。为了探索在中国血友病患儿中使用减量EMI的可能性,我们在综合治疗中心对血友病患儿进行了一项回顾性研究。我们收集了EMI治疗前后的数据,以评估出血率。截至 2023 年 6 月,34 名 HA 儿童接受了 EMI 预防治疗,中位数(范围)为 24.5(2.5-47.9)个月。其中 25 人(73.5%)年龄在 3 岁以下,26 人(76.5%)患有重症血友病,12 人(35.3%)接受过微量治疗或之前未接受过治疗。由于经济原因,34 名患者中有 31 人(91.2%)接受了减量 EMI 治疗。EMI 浓度和 FVIII 样活性的测量结果显示出很强的相关性。总体而言,在接受 EMI 治疗期间,他们的年治疗出血率(ATBR)和年出血率(ABR)显著下降(2-0),而零出血率(ZBR)则显著上升(11.5%-65.4%)。EMI 6 个月后,不同维持剂量的 ATBR 和 ABR 无明显差异。但是,4 毫克/千克以下剂量的 ZBR 明显较低(P = 0.0156)。接收器操作者特征曲线显示零出血的临界值如下:我们的研究表明,即使使用较少的剂量,EMI 也能有效预防出血。然而,EMI 4 周维持剂量<3.8 mg/kg、EMI 浓度<48.1 μg/mL、FVIII 样活性<15.4 IU/dL 时,出血风险可能更高。合理减少剂量非常重要。可根据具体情况调整剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Investigation
Pediatric Investigation Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信