Primary Metabolites and Microbial Diversity in Commercial Kombucha Products

Jonathan H. Sogin, Randy W. Worobo
{"title":"Primary Metabolites and Microbial Diversity in Commercial Kombucha Products","authors":"Jonathan H. Sogin, Randy W. Worobo","doi":"10.3390/fermentation10080385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kombucha brewers selling non-alcoholic beverages in the United States must ensure that the ethanol content of their products remains below 0.5% (v/v) throughout all stages of production and shelf life. Producers struggle to comply with this regulation in the absence of expensive dealcoholizing equipment if they wish to sell the unpasteurized or minimally pasteurized products that consumers typically expect. To identify which bacterial and/or fungal species contribute to the high ethanol content of commercial kombucha, we analyzed 47 commercial kombucha samples purchased at supermarkets near Cornell University in Ithaca, NY, USA. We analyzed samples for ethanol content via HPLC, microbial load determination, and next-generation amplicon sequencing of the bacterial and fungal populations of those samples. Two brands were found to contain significantly more than 0.5% ethanol (v/v) in the tested samples (t-test, p < 0.05, greater), and three brands were found to contain significantly different amounts of sugar in the tested samples compared to what was reported on the nutrition label (one higher and two lower, t-test, p < 0.05, two-sided). The microbial communities of the samples most significantly varied due to brand (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05). The main bacterial genera observed in the samples were Komagataeibacter, Acetobacter, Gluconobacter, Oenococcus, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium. The main fungal genera observed in the samples were Saccharomyces, Dekkera, Cyberlindnera, Lachancea, Schizosaccharomyces, and Pichia. We did not identify any bacterial or fungal species associated with differences in ethanol content between samples within brands, suggesting significant strain variation in the bacteria and fungi involved in commercial kombucha fermentation. However, we did find that the relative abundance of Lactobacillales and the lactic acid content of the samples were significantly correlated (Kendall correlation test, p < 0.05). These results build upon recent research elucidating the role of lactic acid bacteria in the commercial fermentation of kombucha.","PeriodicalId":12379,"journal":{"name":"Fermentation","volume":"43 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fermentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10080385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kombucha brewers selling non-alcoholic beverages in the United States must ensure that the ethanol content of their products remains below 0.5% (v/v) throughout all stages of production and shelf life. Producers struggle to comply with this regulation in the absence of expensive dealcoholizing equipment if they wish to sell the unpasteurized or minimally pasteurized products that consumers typically expect. To identify which bacterial and/or fungal species contribute to the high ethanol content of commercial kombucha, we analyzed 47 commercial kombucha samples purchased at supermarkets near Cornell University in Ithaca, NY, USA. We analyzed samples for ethanol content via HPLC, microbial load determination, and next-generation amplicon sequencing of the bacterial and fungal populations of those samples. Two brands were found to contain significantly more than 0.5% ethanol (v/v) in the tested samples (t-test, p < 0.05, greater), and three brands were found to contain significantly different amounts of sugar in the tested samples compared to what was reported on the nutrition label (one higher and two lower, t-test, p < 0.05, two-sided). The microbial communities of the samples most significantly varied due to brand (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05). The main bacterial genera observed in the samples were Komagataeibacter, Acetobacter, Gluconobacter, Oenococcus, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium. The main fungal genera observed in the samples were Saccharomyces, Dekkera, Cyberlindnera, Lachancea, Schizosaccharomyces, and Pichia. We did not identify any bacterial or fungal species associated with differences in ethanol content between samples within brands, suggesting significant strain variation in the bacteria and fungi involved in commercial kombucha fermentation. However, we did find that the relative abundance of Lactobacillales and the lactic acid content of the samples were significantly correlated (Kendall correlation test, p < 0.05). These results build upon recent research elucidating the role of lactic acid bacteria in the commercial fermentation of kombucha.
商用昆布茶产品中的初级代谢物和微生物多样性
在美国销售无酒精饮料的昆布茶酿造商必须确保其产品在整个生产和保质期内的乙醇含量始终低于 0.5%(v/v)。如果生产商希望销售消费者通常期望的未经巴氏杀菌或巴氏杀菌程度极低的产品,那么在没有昂贵的脱醇设备的情况下,他们就很难遵守这一规定。为了确定哪些细菌和/或真菌物种导致了商业昆布茶的高乙醇含量,我们分析了在美国纽约州伊萨卡市康奈尔大学附近超市购买的 47 个商业昆布茶样品。我们通过高效液相色谱分析了样品中的乙醇含量,测定了微生物负荷,并对这些样品中的细菌和真菌种群进行了下一代扩增子测序。结果发现,有两个品牌的测试样品中乙醇(v/v)含量明显超过 0.5%(t 检验,p < 0.05,较大),有三个品牌的测试样品中糖含量与营养标签上的含量明显不同(一个较高,两个较低,t 检验,p < 0.05,双侧)。样品中的微生物群落因品牌的不同而有显著差异(PERMANOVA,P < 0.05)。在样品中观察到的主要细菌属有 Komagataeibacter、Acetobacter、Gluconobacter、Oenococcus、Lactobacillus 和 Bifidobacterium。在样本中观察到的主要真菌属有酵母菌属、Dekkera 菌属、Cyberlindnera 菌属、Lachancea 菌属、Schizosaccharomyces 菌属和 Pichia 菌属。我们没有发现任何细菌或真菌物种与品牌内不同样品之间乙醇含量的差异有关,这表明参与商业昆布茶发酵的细菌和真菌存在显著的菌株差异。不过,我们确实发现乳酸菌的相对丰度与样品的乳酸含量有显著相关性(肯德尔相关性检验,p < 0.05)。这些结果建立在最近阐明乳酸菌在昆布茶商业发酵中的作用的研究基础之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信