No difference in clinical parameters and drug retention in PsA patients receiving b/tsDMARD monotherapy versus combination with methotrexate: data from the RABBIT-SpA registry.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Anne Constanze Regierer, David Kiefer, Georg Schett, Andreas Krause, Anja Weiß, Philipp Sewerin, Anja Strangfeld
{"title":"No difference in clinical parameters and drug retention in PsA patients receiving b/tsDMARD monotherapy versus combination with methotrexate: data from the RABBIT-SpA registry.","authors":"Anne Constanze Regierer, David Kiefer, Georg Schett, Andreas Krause, Anja Weiß, Philipp Sewerin, Anja Strangfeld","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential benefit of methotrexate (MTX) in combination with biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is still a matter of debate.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare clinical and patient reported characteristics as well as drug retention rates in PsA patients receiving b/tsDMARD monotherapy or in combination with MTX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RABBIT-SpA is a prospective longitudinal cohort study including axSpA and PsA patients. In this analysis, PsA patients were stratified into two groups: starting b/tsDMARD as monotherapy or in combination with MTX. Treatment retention was compared by drug survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>69% of the patients (n=900) started b/tsDMARD as monotherapy while 31% were treated in combination with MTX (n=405). At baseline, clinical domains like skin, nail and joint affection, dactylitis, enthesitis and axial involvement were similar between the groups. Only the patients' satisfaction concerning tolerability of the previous treatment was significantly better in the combination group at treatment start. Drug retention rates did not differ between the groups (p=0.4). At 6/12 months, 66%/48% of patients in monotherapy and 67%/48% in the combination group were still on their original treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not identify any clinical parameters with notable influence on the choice of b/tsDMARD mono or MTX-combination therapy in PsA. Drug retention rates are similar between mono and combination therapy. It seems that the decision to continue MTX at initiation of b/tsDMARDs is mostly based on the subjective tolerability of MTX treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The potential benefit of methotrexate (MTX) in combination with biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is still a matter of debate.

Objectives: To compare clinical and patient reported characteristics as well as drug retention rates in PsA patients receiving b/tsDMARD monotherapy or in combination with MTX.

Methods: RABBIT-SpA is a prospective longitudinal cohort study including axSpA and PsA patients. In this analysis, PsA patients were stratified into two groups: starting b/tsDMARD as monotherapy or in combination with MTX. Treatment retention was compared by drug survival analysis.

Results: 69% of the patients (n=900) started b/tsDMARD as monotherapy while 31% were treated in combination with MTX (n=405). At baseline, clinical domains like skin, nail and joint affection, dactylitis, enthesitis and axial involvement were similar between the groups. Only the patients' satisfaction concerning tolerability of the previous treatment was significantly better in the combination group at treatment start. Drug retention rates did not differ between the groups (p=0.4). At 6/12 months, 66%/48% of patients in monotherapy and 67%/48% in the combination group were still on their original treatment.

Conclusions: We did not identify any clinical parameters with notable influence on the choice of b/tsDMARD mono or MTX-combination therapy in PsA. Drug retention rates are similar between mono and combination therapy. It seems that the decision to continue MTX at initiation of b/tsDMARDs is mostly based on the subjective tolerability of MTX treatment.

接受 b/tsDMARD 单药治疗与联合甲氨蝶呤治疗的 PsA 患者的临床参数和药物保留率无差异:来自 RABBIT-SpA 登记的数据。
背景:甲氨蝶呤(MTX)与生物制剂(b)和靶向合成(ts)改良抗风湿药物(DMARDs)联合治疗银屑病关节炎(PsA)的潜在益处仍存在争议:比较接受b/tsDMARD单药治疗或与MTX联合治疗的PsA患者的临床和患者报告特征以及药物保留率:RABBIT-SpA是一项前瞻性纵向队列研究,包括axSpA和PsA患者。在这项分析中,PsA 患者被分为两组:开始接受 b/tsDMARD 单药治疗或联合 MTX 治疗。通过药物存活率分析比较了治疗保留率:69%的患者(n=900)开始接受b/tsDMARD单药治疗,31%的患者(n=405)与MTX联合治疗。基线时,两组患者的皮肤、指甲和关节肿痛、趾骨炎、趾关节炎和轴受累等临床症状相似。只有在治疗开始时,联合用药组患者对之前治疗耐受性的满意度明显更高。两组的药物保留率没有差异(P=0.4)。6/12个月时,66%/48%的单药治疗患者和67%/48%的联合用药组患者仍在接受原来的治疗:我们没有发现任何临床参数对PsA患者选择b/tsDMARD单药或MTX联合疗法有显著影响。单一疗法和联合疗法的药物保留率相似。似乎在开始使用 b/tsDMARDs 时继续使用 MTX 的决定主要是基于 MTX 治疗的主观耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RMD Open
RMD Open RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
205
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信