Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Passively Classify Naturalistic Binge Eating and Vomiting Among Adults With Binge-Spectrum Eating Disorders: A Preliminary Investigation

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Emily K. Presseller, Elizabeth A. Velkoff, Devyn R. Riddle, Jianyi Liu, Fengqing Zhang, Adrienne S. Juarascio
{"title":"Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Passively Classify Naturalistic Binge Eating and Vomiting Among Adults With Binge-Spectrum Eating Disorders: A Preliminary Investigation","authors":"Emily K. Presseller,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Velkoff,&nbsp;Devyn R. Riddle,&nbsp;Jianyi Liu,&nbsp;Fengqing Zhang,&nbsp;Adrienne S. Juarascio","doi":"10.1002/eat.24266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Binge eating and self-induced vomiting are common, transdiagnostic eating disorder (ED) symptoms. Efforts to understand these behaviors in research and clinical settings have historically relied on self-report measures, which may be biased and have limited ecological validity. It may be possible to passively detect binge eating and vomiting using data collected by continuous glucose monitors (CGMs; minimally invasive sensors that measure blood glucose levels), as these behaviors yield characteristic glucose responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This study developed machine learning classification algorithms to classify binge eating and vomiting among 22 adults with binge-spectrum EDs using CGM data. Participants wore Dexcom G6 CGMs and reported eating episodes and disordered eating symptoms using ecological momentary assessment for 2 weeks. Group-level random forest models were generated to distinguish binge eating from typical eating episodes and to classify instances of vomiting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The binge eating model had accuracy of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.92), sensitivity of 0.56, and specificity of 0.90. The vomiting model demonstrated accuracy of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.91), sensitivity of 0.88, and specificity of 0.71.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Results suggest that CGM may be a promising avenue for passively classifying binge eating and vomiting, with implications for innovative research and clinical applications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"57 11","pages":"2285-2291"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Binge eating and self-induced vomiting are common, transdiagnostic eating disorder (ED) symptoms. Efforts to understand these behaviors in research and clinical settings have historically relied on self-report measures, which may be biased and have limited ecological validity. It may be possible to passively detect binge eating and vomiting using data collected by continuous glucose monitors (CGMs; minimally invasive sensors that measure blood glucose levels), as these behaviors yield characteristic glucose responses.

Method

This study developed machine learning classification algorithms to classify binge eating and vomiting among 22 adults with binge-spectrum EDs using CGM data. Participants wore Dexcom G6 CGMs and reported eating episodes and disordered eating symptoms using ecological momentary assessment for 2 weeks. Group-level random forest models were generated to distinguish binge eating from typical eating episodes and to classify instances of vomiting.

Results

The binge eating model had accuracy of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.92), sensitivity of 0.56, and specificity of 0.90. The vomiting model demonstrated accuracy of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.91), sensitivity of 0.88, and specificity of 0.71.

Discussion

Results suggest that CGM may be a promising avenue for passively classifying binge eating and vomiting, with implications for innovative research and clinical applications.

使用连续血糖监测对患有暴食症的成年人的自然暴食和呕吐进行被动分类:初步调查。
目的:暴饮暴食和自我诱导呕吐是常见的跨诊断饮食失调症(ED)症状。在研究和临床环境中,了解这些行为的努力历来依赖于自我报告措施,而这些措施可能存在偏差且生态有效性有限。利用连续血糖监测仪(CGM;测量血糖水平的微创传感器)收集的数据被动检测暴饮暴食和呕吐也许是可行的,因为这些行为会产生特征性的血糖反应:本研究开发了机器学习分类算法,利用 CGM 数据对 22 名患有暴饮暴食型 ED 的成年人中的暴饮暴食和呕吐行为进行分类。参与者佩戴 Dexcom G6 CGM,并使用生态学瞬间评估报告进食发作和饮食失调症状,为期 2 周。我们生成了组级随机森林模型来区分暴饮暴食和典型进食发作,并对呕吐情况进行分类:暴饮暴食模型的准确度为 0.88(95% CI:0.83,0.92),灵敏度为 0.56,特异度为 0.90。呕吐模型的准确度为 0.79(95% CI:0.62,0.91),灵敏度为 0.88,特异性为 0.71:结果表明,CGM 可能是被动分类暴饮暴食和呕吐的一个有前途的途径,对创新研究和临床应用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信