Michael F. Dorman, Sarah C. Natale, Joshua S. Stohl, Jenna Felder
{"title":"Frontiers | Close approximations to the sound of a cochlear implant","authors":"Michael F. Dorman, Sarah C. Natale, Joshua S. Stohl, Jenna Felder","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2024.1434786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cochlear implant (CI) systems differ in terms of electrode design and signal processing. It is likely that patients fit with different implant systems will experience different percepts when presented speech via their implant. The sound quality of speech can be evaluated by asking single-sided-deaf (SSD) listeners fit with a cochlear implant (CI) to modify clean signals presented to their typically hearing ear to match the sound quality of signals presented to their CI ear. In this paper, we describe very close matches to CI sound quality, i.e., similarity ratings of 9.5 to 10 on a 10-point scale, by ten patients fit with a 28 mm electrode array and MED EL signal processing. The modifications required to make close approximations to CI sound quality fell into two groups: One consisted of a restricted frequency bandwidth and spectral smearing while a second was characterized by a wide bandwidth and no spectral smearing. Both sets of modifications were different from those found for patients with shorter electrode arrays who chose upshifts in voice pitch and formant frequencies to match CI sound quality. The data from matching-based metrics of CI sound quality document that speech sound-quality differs for patients fit with different CIs and among patients fit with the same CI.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1434786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cochlear implant (CI) systems differ in terms of electrode design and signal processing. It is likely that patients fit with different implant systems will experience different percepts when presented speech via their implant. The sound quality of speech can be evaluated by asking single-sided-deaf (SSD) listeners fit with a cochlear implant (CI) to modify clean signals presented to their typically hearing ear to match the sound quality of signals presented to their CI ear. In this paper, we describe very close matches to CI sound quality, i.e., similarity ratings of 9.5 to 10 on a 10-point scale, by ten patients fit with a 28 mm electrode array and MED EL signal processing. The modifications required to make close approximations to CI sound quality fell into two groups: One consisted of a restricted frequency bandwidth and spectral smearing while a second was characterized by a wide bandwidth and no spectral smearing. Both sets of modifications were different from those found for patients with shorter electrode arrays who chose upshifts in voice pitch and formant frequencies to match CI sound quality. The data from matching-based metrics of CI sound quality document that speech sound-quality differs for patients fit with different CIs and among patients fit with the same CI.
人工耳蜗(CI)系统在电极设计和信号处理方面各不相同。植入不同植入系统的患者在通过植入体聆听语音时可能会有不同的感受。可以通过让植入人工耳蜗(CI)的单侧耳聋(SSD)听者修改其典型听力耳的纯净信号,使其与植入 CI 耳的信号音质相匹配,来评估语音的音质。在本文中,我们描述了十名安装了 28 毫米电极阵列和 MED EL 信号处理器的患者与 CI 音质非常接近的情况,即相似度在 10 分制中达到 9.5 到 10 分。为接近 CI 音质所需的修改分为两组:一类是限制频率带宽和频谱模糊,另一类是宽频带宽和无频谱模糊。这两组修饰都不同于电极阵列较短的患者,后者选择上移声调和共振频率来匹配 CI 音质。基于匹配的 CI 音质度量数据表明,使用不同 CI 的患者和使用相同 CI 的患者的语音音质是不同的。