Exploring the influence of regulated learning processes on learners’ prestige in project-based learning

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fengjiao Tu, Linjing Wu, Kinshuk, Junhua Ding, Haihua Chen
{"title":"Exploring the influence of regulated learning processes on learners’ prestige in project-based learning","authors":"Fengjiao Tu, Linjing Wu, Kinshuk, Junhua Ding, Haihua Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12870-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the development of information and communication technology, project-based learning (PBL) has become an important pedagogical approach. Group leaders are critical in PBL, and prestige influences learner leadership. Regulation affects learners’ prestige, but research on their relationship is lacking. Through content analysis and epistemic network analysis, we examine the regulatory patterns of 21 learners engaged in multi-layered online PBL through online collaborative learning activities over 14 weeks. The analysis results show that: (1) High-prestige learners engaged significantly in “socially shared regulation (U = 24.0, Z = -2.183, p = 0.029)”, “monitoring (U = 26.5, Z = -2.008, P = 0.043)”, “task understanding (U = 15.0, Z = -2.829, p = 0.004)”, and “organizing O (U = 20.5, Z = 0.015, p = 0.013)”. (2) The regulatory patterns during PBL stages show that high-prestige learners focus on task dimensions in intra-group discussions. (3) High-prestige learners display positive emotions in inter-group assessments and intra-group refinements. In contrast, low-prestige learners exhibit higher negative emotional engagement. (4) There is a strong correlation between socially shared regulation (GRG = 0.780), content monitoring (GRG = 0.728), and learners’ prestige. Socially shared regulation (p = 0.001), self-regulation (p = 0.001), monitoring (p = 0.006), evaluation (p = 0.019), content monitoring (p = 0.000), and process monitoring (p = 0.018) all significantly positively impact learners’ prestige. The findings suggest that providing self-regulation and socially shared regulation scaffolding for PBL and utilizing various other methods to enhance learner regulation of learning are likely to increase learners’ prestige and PBL effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12870-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the development of information and communication technology, project-based learning (PBL) has become an important pedagogical approach. Group leaders are critical in PBL, and prestige influences learner leadership. Regulation affects learners’ prestige, but research on their relationship is lacking. Through content analysis and epistemic network analysis, we examine the regulatory patterns of 21 learners engaged in multi-layered online PBL through online collaborative learning activities over 14 weeks. The analysis results show that: (1) High-prestige learners engaged significantly in “socially shared regulation (U = 24.0, Z = -2.183, p = 0.029)”, “monitoring (U = 26.5, Z = -2.008, P = 0.043)”, “task understanding (U = 15.0, Z = -2.829, p = 0.004)”, and “organizing O (U = 20.5, Z = 0.015, p = 0.013)”. (2) The regulatory patterns during PBL stages show that high-prestige learners focus on task dimensions in intra-group discussions. (3) High-prestige learners display positive emotions in inter-group assessments and intra-group refinements. In contrast, low-prestige learners exhibit higher negative emotional engagement. (4) There is a strong correlation between socially shared regulation (GRG = 0.780), content monitoring (GRG = 0.728), and learners’ prestige. Socially shared regulation (p = 0.001), self-regulation (p = 0.001), monitoring (p = 0.006), evaluation (p = 0.019), content monitoring (p = 0.000), and process monitoring (p = 0.018) all significantly positively impact learners’ prestige. The findings suggest that providing self-regulation and socially shared regulation scaffolding for PBL and utilizing various other methods to enhance learner regulation of learning are likely to increase learners’ prestige and PBL effectiveness.

Abstract Image

探索规范的学习过程对项目式学习中学习者声望的影响
随着信息和通信技术的发展,基于项目的学习(PBL)已成为一种重要的教学方法。小组领导在 PBL 中至关重要,而威信会影响学习者的领导力。调控会影响学习者的威望,但缺乏对两者关系的研究。通过内容分析和认识论网络分析,我们研究了 21 名学习者在 14 周内通过在线协作学习活动参与多层次在线 PBL 的调控模式。分析结果表明(1) 高声望学习者显著参与了 "社会共享调控(U = 24.0,Z = -2.183,P = 0.029)"、"监控(U = 26.5,Z = -2.008,P = 0.043)"、"任务理解(U = 15.0,Z = -2.829,P = 0.004)"和 "组织 O(U = 20.5,Z = 0.015,P = 0.013)"。(2) PBL 阶段的调控模式表明,高声望学习者在组内讨论中关注任务维度。(3) 高声望学习者在组间评估和组内完善中表现出积极情绪。相反,低声望学习者表现出更高的消极情绪参与。(4) 社会共享调节(GRG = 0.780)、内容监控(GRG = 0.728)与学习者威望之间存在很强的相关性。社会共享调节(p = 0.001)、自我调节(p = 0.001)、监控(p = 0.006)、评价(p = 0.019)、内容监控(p = 0.000)和过程监控(p = 0.018)都对学习者的威信有显著的正向影响。研究结果表明,为 PBL 提供自我调控和社会共享调控支架,并利用其他各种方法加强学习者对学习的调控,可能会提高学习者的威信和 PBL 的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信