{"title":"Exploring the influence of regulated learning processes on learners’ prestige in project-based learning","authors":"Fengjiao Tu, Linjing Wu, Kinshuk, Junhua Ding, Haihua Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12870-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the development of information and communication technology, project-based learning (PBL) has become an important pedagogical approach. Group leaders are critical in PBL, and prestige influences learner leadership. Regulation affects learners’ prestige, but research on their relationship is lacking. Through content analysis and epistemic network analysis, we examine the regulatory patterns of 21 learners engaged in multi-layered online PBL through online collaborative learning activities over 14 weeks. The analysis results show that: (1) High-prestige learners engaged significantly in “socially shared regulation (U = 24.0, Z = -2.183, p = 0.029)”, “monitoring (U = 26.5, Z = -2.008, P = 0.043)”, “task understanding (U = 15.0, Z = -2.829, p = 0.004)”, and “organizing O (U = 20.5, Z = 0.015, p = 0.013)”. (2) The regulatory patterns during PBL stages show that high-prestige learners focus on task dimensions in intra-group discussions. (3) High-prestige learners display positive emotions in inter-group assessments and intra-group refinements. In contrast, low-prestige learners exhibit higher negative emotional engagement. (4) There is a strong correlation between socially shared regulation (GRG = 0.780), content monitoring (GRG = 0.728), and learners’ prestige. Socially shared regulation (p = 0.001), self-regulation (p = 0.001), monitoring (p = 0.006), evaluation (p = 0.019), content monitoring (p = 0.000), and process monitoring (p = 0.018) all significantly positively impact learners’ prestige. The findings suggest that providing self-regulation and socially shared regulation scaffolding for PBL and utilizing various other methods to enhance learner regulation of learning are likely to increase learners’ prestige and PBL effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12870-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the development of information and communication technology, project-based learning (PBL) has become an important pedagogical approach. Group leaders are critical in PBL, and prestige influences learner leadership. Regulation affects learners’ prestige, but research on their relationship is lacking. Through content analysis and epistemic network analysis, we examine the regulatory patterns of 21 learners engaged in multi-layered online PBL through online collaborative learning activities over 14 weeks. The analysis results show that: (1) High-prestige learners engaged significantly in “socially shared regulation (U = 24.0, Z = -2.183, p = 0.029)”, “monitoring (U = 26.5, Z = -2.008, P = 0.043)”, “task understanding (U = 15.0, Z = -2.829, p = 0.004)”, and “organizing O (U = 20.5, Z = 0.015, p = 0.013)”. (2) The regulatory patterns during PBL stages show that high-prestige learners focus on task dimensions in intra-group discussions. (3) High-prestige learners display positive emotions in inter-group assessments and intra-group refinements. In contrast, low-prestige learners exhibit higher negative emotional engagement. (4) There is a strong correlation between socially shared regulation (GRG = 0.780), content monitoring (GRG = 0.728), and learners’ prestige. Socially shared regulation (p = 0.001), self-regulation (p = 0.001), monitoring (p = 0.006), evaluation (p = 0.019), content monitoring (p = 0.000), and process monitoring (p = 0.018) all significantly positively impact learners’ prestige. The findings suggest that providing self-regulation and socially shared regulation scaffolding for PBL and utilizing various other methods to enhance learner regulation of learning are likely to increase learners’ prestige and PBL effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments.
The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts. The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.