Cancer diagnosis based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with bagging-voting fusion model

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jiaojiao Li , Xinrui Pan , Lianbo Guo , Yongshun Chen
{"title":"Cancer diagnosis based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with bagging-voting fusion model","authors":"Jiaojiao Li ,&nbsp;Xinrui Pan ,&nbsp;Lianbo Guo ,&nbsp;Yongshun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advances in cancer diagnostics play a pivotal role in increasing early detection of cancer. Integrating laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) with machine learning algorithms has attracted wide interest in cancer diagnosis. However, using a single model`s efficacy is limited by algorithm principles, making it challenging to meet the comprehensive needs of cancer diagnosis. Here, we demonstrate a bagging-voting fusion (BVF) algorithm for the detection and identification of multiple types of cancer. In the BVF model of this paper, support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and random forest (RF) models, which have relatively small homogeneity to obtain more comprehensive decision boundaries, are fused at both the training and decision levels. LIBS spectral data was collected from four types of serum samples, including liver cancer, lung cancer, esophageal cancer, and healthy control. LIBS detection was conducted on the samples, which were directly dropped onto ordered microarray silicon substrates and dried. The results showed that the BVF model achieved an accuracy of 92.53 % and a recall of 92.92 % across the four types of serum, outperforming the best single machine-learning model (SVM: accuracy 75.86 %, recall 77.50 %). Moreover, the BVF model with manual line selection feature extraction required only 140 s for a single detection and identification. In conclusion, the aforementioned results demonstrated that LIBS with BVF has excellent performance in detecting a multitude of cancers, and is expected to provide a new method for efficient and accurate cancer diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324001085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in cancer diagnostics play a pivotal role in increasing early detection of cancer. Integrating laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) with machine learning algorithms has attracted wide interest in cancer diagnosis. However, using a single model`s efficacy is limited by algorithm principles, making it challenging to meet the comprehensive needs of cancer diagnosis. Here, we demonstrate a bagging-voting fusion (BVF) algorithm for the detection and identification of multiple types of cancer. In the BVF model of this paper, support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and random forest (RF) models, which have relatively small homogeneity to obtain more comprehensive decision boundaries, are fused at both the training and decision levels. LIBS spectral data was collected from four types of serum samples, including liver cancer, lung cancer, esophageal cancer, and healthy control. LIBS detection was conducted on the samples, which were directly dropped onto ordered microarray silicon substrates and dried. The results showed that the BVF model achieved an accuracy of 92.53 % and a recall of 92.92 % across the four types of serum, outperforming the best single machine-learning model (SVM: accuracy 75.86 %, recall 77.50 %). Moreover, the BVF model with manual line selection feature extraction required only 140 s for a single detection and identification. In conclusion, the aforementioned results demonstrated that LIBS with BVF has excellent performance in detecting a multitude of cancers, and is expected to provide a new method for efficient and accurate cancer diagnosis.
基于激光诱导击穿光谱的癌症诊断与袋式投票融合模型
癌症诊断技术的进步在提高癌症早期检测率方面发挥着举足轻重的作用。将激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)与机器学习算法相结合在癌症诊断中引起了广泛关注。然而,使用单一模型的功效受到算法原理的限制,难以满足癌症诊断的全面需求。在此,我们展示了一种用于检测和识别多种类型癌症的分组投票融合(BVF)算法。在本文的 BVF 模型中,支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)、k-近邻(KNN)、二次判别分析(QDA)和随机森林(RF)模型的同质性相对较小,因此可以获得更全面的决策边界,这些模型在训练和决策两个层面上进行了融合。从肝癌、肺癌、食管癌和健康对照等四种血清样本中收集了 LIBS 光谱数据。样品被直接滴在有序的微阵列硅基底上并烘干,然后进行 LIBS 检测。结果表明,BVF 模型在四种血清中的准确率达到 92.53%,召回率达到 92.92%,优于最佳单一机器学习模型(SVM:准确率 75.86%,召回率 77.50%)。此外,BVF 模型采用人工选择线特征提取,单次检测和识别仅需 140 秒。总之,上述结果表明,带有 BVF 的 LIBS 在检测多种癌症方面表现出色,有望为高效、准确的癌症诊断提供一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信