Tasks at hand or more challenges: The roles of regulatory focus and job insecurity in predicting work behaviours

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Yan Tu, Hai-Jiang Wang, Lixin Jiang, Hans De Witte, Lirong Long
{"title":"Tasks at hand or more challenges: The roles of regulatory focus and job insecurity in predicting work behaviours","authors":"Yan Tu,&nbsp;Hai-Jiang Wang,&nbsp;Lixin Jiang,&nbsp;Hans De Witte,&nbsp;Lirong Long","doi":"10.1111/joop.12533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous studies have explored the effects of trait regulatory focus on routine performance and proactive behaviour yet failed to reveal the underlying motivational mechanisms and investigate how these effects may operate in uncertain environments. To fill this gap, our study first draws upon regulatory focus theory to examine the motivational mechanisms linking trait regulatory focus with routine performance and challenge-seeking behaviour (i.e., a type of proactive behaviour). We hypothesize that trait prevention focus improves routine performance but reduces challenge-seeking behaviour via avoidance motivation, whereas trait promotion focus increases routine performance and challenge-seeking behaviour through approach motivation. Incorporating trait activation theory, we further theorize that uncertainty that threatens individuals' security needs (i.e., quantitative job insecurity) strengthens trait prevention focus effects, while uncertainty that threatens individuals' growth needs (i.e., qualitative job insecurity) weakens trait promotion focus effects. Analysing two-wave data from 275 employees and 58 supervisors, we found that (a) trait prevention focus had an unconditional positive indirect effect on employee self-reported routine performance via increased avoidance motivation and (b) trait promotion focus had positive indirect effects on employee self-reported and supervisor-rated routine performance and challenge-seeking behaviour via enhanced approach motivation, with these effects stronger at lower levels of qualitative job insecurity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"97 4","pages":"1632-1658"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have explored the effects of trait regulatory focus on routine performance and proactive behaviour yet failed to reveal the underlying motivational mechanisms and investigate how these effects may operate in uncertain environments. To fill this gap, our study first draws upon regulatory focus theory to examine the motivational mechanisms linking trait regulatory focus with routine performance and challenge-seeking behaviour (i.e., a type of proactive behaviour). We hypothesize that trait prevention focus improves routine performance but reduces challenge-seeking behaviour via avoidance motivation, whereas trait promotion focus increases routine performance and challenge-seeking behaviour through approach motivation. Incorporating trait activation theory, we further theorize that uncertainty that threatens individuals' security needs (i.e., quantitative job insecurity) strengthens trait prevention focus effects, while uncertainty that threatens individuals' growth needs (i.e., qualitative job insecurity) weakens trait promotion focus effects. Analysing two-wave data from 275 employees and 58 supervisors, we found that (a) trait prevention focus had an unconditional positive indirect effect on employee self-reported routine performance via increased avoidance motivation and (b) trait promotion focus had positive indirect effects on employee self-reported and supervisor-rated routine performance and challenge-seeking behaviour via enhanced approach motivation, with these effects stronger at lower levels of qualitative job insecurity.

手头的任务还是更多的挑战:监管重点和工作不安全感在预测工作行为中的作用
以往的研究探讨了特质调节焦点对日常表现和积极主动行为的影响,但未能揭示其潜在的动机机制,也未能研究这些影响如何在不确定的环境中发挥作用。为了填补这一空白,我们的研究首先借鉴了调控焦点理论,考察了特质调控焦点与日常表现和寻求挑战行为(即主动行为的一种)之间的动机机制。我们假设,特质预防关注会提高常规绩效,但会通过回避动机减少寻求挑战的行为,而特质促进关注则会通过接近动机提高常规绩效和寻求挑战的行为。结合特质激活理论,我们进一步推测,威胁个人安全需求的不确定性(即定量工作不安全感)会加强特质预防关注效应,而威胁个人成长需求的不确定性(即定性工作不安全感)会削弱特质促进关注效应。通过分析来自 275 名员工和 58 名主管的两波数据,我们发现:(a)特质预防关注通过增强回避动机,对员工自我报告的日常绩效产生了无条件的正向间接效应;(b)特质促进关注通过增强接近动机,对员工自我报告和主管评定的日常绩效和寻求挑战行为产生了正向间接效应,这些效应在较低的工作不安全感水平下更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信