An adaptation and exploratory factor analysis of the smoking-related weight and eating episodes test (SWEET) for electronic cigarette users

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Caitlin E. Smith , Tyler B. Mason , Naim Wright , Emily Ruttledge , Jordan E. Norris , John R. Monterosso , Alayna P. Tackett
{"title":"An adaptation and exploratory factor analysis of the smoking-related weight and eating episodes test (SWEET) for electronic cigarette users","authors":"Caitlin E. Smith ,&nbsp;Tyler B. Mason ,&nbsp;Naim Wright ,&nbsp;Emily Ruttledge ,&nbsp;Jordan E. Norris ,&nbsp;John R. Monterosso ,&nbsp;Alayna P. Tackett","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Smoking for weight control is a well-documented behavior. There is emerging evidence to suggest electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) may be used for similar motivations yet measure development for the use of e-cigarettes for weight control has received less attention. The objective of the current study was to adapt and explore the psychometric properties of The Smoking-Related Weight and Eating Episodes Test (SWEET) for e-cigarette users.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Young adult (N=1875) current cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual users completed the original SWEET (SWEET-C) and/or adapted SWEET for e-cigarette use (SWEET-EC) based on current tobacco product use. Demographics, associated e-cigarette characteristics, nicotine dependence, outcome expectancies, and eating disorder behaviors were also assessed. Participants were recruited online and measures were completed via self-report.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four exploratory factor analyses using principal components extraction and direct oblimin rotation methods were run to explore the SWEET-C and SWEET-EC. A one-factor solution explaining 66 % of the variance was retained for the SWEET-C, and a one-factor solution explaining 73 % of the variance was retained for the SWEET-EC. Both measures exhibited excellent internal consistency. Higher SWEET-EC scores were observed among dual users, and were associated with daily e-cigarette use, JUUL use, self-reported vaping for weight control, older age, higher body mass index, and problematic eating behaviors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings support the adaptation of the SWEET-EC to measure e-cigarette use for weight control. The SWEET-EC will help to better understand how individuals use e-cigarettes to curb eating behavior and for weight control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 108102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324001515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Smoking for weight control is a well-documented behavior. There is emerging evidence to suggest electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) may be used for similar motivations yet measure development for the use of e-cigarettes for weight control has received less attention. The objective of the current study was to adapt and explore the psychometric properties of The Smoking-Related Weight and Eating Episodes Test (SWEET) for e-cigarette users.

Methods

Young adult (N=1875) current cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual users completed the original SWEET (SWEET-C) and/or adapted SWEET for e-cigarette use (SWEET-EC) based on current tobacco product use. Demographics, associated e-cigarette characteristics, nicotine dependence, outcome expectancies, and eating disorder behaviors were also assessed. Participants were recruited online and measures were completed via self-report.

Results

Four exploratory factor analyses using principal components extraction and direct oblimin rotation methods were run to explore the SWEET-C and SWEET-EC. A one-factor solution explaining 66 % of the variance was retained for the SWEET-C, and a one-factor solution explaining 73 % of the variance was retained for the SWEET-EC. Both measures exhibited excellent internal consistency. Higher SWEET-EC scores were observed among dual users, and were associated with daily e-cigarette use, JUUL use, self-reported vaping for weight control, older age, higher body mass index, and problematic eating behaviors.

Conclusion

Our findings support the adaptation of the SWEET-EC to measure e-cigarette use for weight control. The SWEET-EC will help to better understand how individuals use e-cigarettes to curb eating behavior and for weight control.

针对电子烟使用者的吸烟相关体重和饮食事件测试(SWEET)的调整和探索性因素分析
引言 吸烟控制体重是一种有据可查的行为。越来越多的证据表明,使用电子烟(电子烟)也有类似的动机,但针对使用电子烟控制体重的测量方法的开发却较少受到关注。本研究的目的是针对电子烟使用者调整和探索吸烟相关体重和进食发作测试(SWEET)的心理计量特性。方法目前使用卷烟、电子烟和双重使用者的年轻成年人(人数=1875)完成原始 SWEET(SWEET-C)和/或根据目前烟草产品使用情况调整的电子烟使用 SWEET(SWEET-EC)。此外,还对人口统计学、相关电子烟特征、尼古丁依赖、结果预期和饮食失调行为进行了评估。结果使用主成分提取和直接顺反旋转方法进行了四次探索性因子分析,以探索 SWEET-C 和 SWEET-EC。SWEET-C 的单因素解解释了 66% 的方差,SWEET-EC 的单因素解解释了 73% 的方差。这两项测量均表现出极佳的内部一致性。在双重使用者中观察到较高的 SWEET-EC 分数,并且与每天使用电子烟、使用 JUUL、自我报告吸食电子烟以控制体重、年龄较大、体重指数较高以及有问题的饮食行为有关。SWEET-EC 将有助于更好地了解个人如何使用电子烟来抑制饮食行为和控制体重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信