The speed of completion of the decremental responses on repetitive nerve stimulation

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Yuki Ueta , Takamichi Kanbayashi , Yosuke Miyaji , Yuki Hatanaka , Keisuke Tachiyama , Kazusa Takahashi , Hiroo Terashi , Hitoshi Aizawa , Masahiro Sonoo
{"title":"The speed of completion of the decremental responses on repetitive nerve stimulation","authors":"Yuki Ueta ,&nbsp;Takamichi Kanbayashi ,&nbsp;Yosuke Miyaji ,&nbsp;Yuki Hatanaka ,&nbsp;Keisuke Tachiyama ,&nbsp;Kazusa Takahashi ,&nbsp;Hiroo Terashi ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Aizawa ,&nbsp;Masahiro Sonoo","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>It is generally believed that the decremental response in repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) stabilizes at the fourth or fifth response. We have a preliminary impression that the decremental response approaches a plateau earlier in proximal muscles than in distal muscles. We investigated the speed of the completion of the decremental response in different muscles.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The “decrement completion ratio (DCR)” in the second or third response (DCR2 or DCR3) was defined as the ratio of the decremental percentage of the second or third response to that of the fourth response. Patients showing more than 10% decremental response both in the abductor pollicis (APB) and deltoid muscles were retrospectively extracted from our EMG database. The DCR2 and DCR3 were compared between two muscles in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Identified subjects consisted of 11patients with MG and 11 patients with ALS. Multiple regression analysis revealed that only the difference of muscle influenced on DCR2 and DCR3, with no contribution from the different disorder (MG or ALS) or the initial amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP). Both DCR2 and DCR3 were significantly higher in deltoid than in APB. In ALS, the normalized CMAP amplitude was not different between APB and deltoid whereas the decremental percentage was significantly higher in deltoid, suggesting a lower safety factor of the neuromuscular transmission in proximal muscles.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The decremental response completed more rapidly in deltoid than in APB which may be related to the lower safety factor also documented by this study.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Unexpected early completion of the decrement such as at the second response in RNS is not a technical error but may be an extreme of the rapid completion in deltoid, a proximal muscle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 211-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X24000192/pdfft?md5=0179049e31ad5c3015c4fdbd0d282190&pid=1-s2.0-S2467981X24000192-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X24000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

It is generally believed that the decremental response in repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) stabilizes at the fourth or fifth response. We have a preliminary impression that the decremental response approaches a plateau earlier in proximal muscles than in distal muscles. We investigated the speed of the completion of the decremental response in different muscles.

Methods

The “decrement completion ratio (DCR)” in the second or third response (DCR2 or DCR3) was defined as the ratio of the decremental percentage of the second or third response to that of the fourth response. Patients showing more than 10% decremental response both in the abductor pollicis (APB) and deltoid muscles were retrospectively extracted from our EMG database. The DCR2 and DCR3 were compared between two muscles in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Results

Identified subjects consisted of 11patients with MG and 11 patients with ALS. Multiple regression analysis revealed that only the difference of muscle influenced on DCR2 and DCR3, with no contribution from the different disorder (MG or ALS) or the initial amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP). Both DCR2 and DCR3 were significantly higher in deltoid than in APB. In ALS, the normalized CMAP amplitude was not different between APB and deltoid whereas the decremental percentage was significantly higher in deltoid, suggesting a lower safety factor of the neuromuscular transmission in proximal muscles.

Conclusions

The decremental response completed more rapidly in deltoid than in APB which may be related to the lower safety factor also documented by this study.

Significance

Unexpected early completion of the decrement such as at the second response in RNS is not a technical error but may be an extreme of the rapid completion in deltoid, a proximal muscle.

重复神经刺激时递减反应的完成速度
目的 一般认为,重复性神经刺激(RNS)的递减反应在第四次或第五次反应时趋于稳定。我们的初步印象是,近端肌肉的递减反应比远端肌肉更早趋于稳定。我们研究了不同肌肉的递减反应完成速度。方法第二或第三次反应的 "递减完成比(DCR)"(DCR2 或 DCR3)定义为第二或第三次反应的递减百分比与第四次反应的递减百分比之比。我们从肌电图数据库中回顾性地提取了脊柱外展肌(APB)和三角肌反应递减均超过10%的患者。比较了重症肌无力(MG)和肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症(ALS)患者两块肌肉的 DCR2 和 DCR3。多元回归分析表明,只有肌肉的差异会对 DCR2 和 DCR3 产生影响,而不同的疾病(MG 或 ALS)或复合肌动作电位(CMAP)的初始振幅不会对其产生影响。三角肌的 DCR2 和 DCR3 都明显高于 APB。在 ALS 中,APB 和三角肌的归一化 CMAP 振幅没有差异,而三角肌的递减百分比明显更高,这表明近端肌肉的神经肌肉传递安全系数更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信