Performance of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Eyes with Preexisting Retinal Disease.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1159/000540187
Olga Reitblat, David A Velleman, Adi Levy, Ehud I Assia, Guy Kleinmann
{"title":"Performance of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Eyes with Preexisting Retinal Disease.","authors":"Olga Reitblat, David A Velleman, Adi Levy, Ehud I Assia, Guy Kleinmann","doi":"10.1159/000540187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) offers improved near and intermediate vision, aiming to reduce spectacle dependence in cataract patients. This research aimed to evaluate the performance of EDOF IOL in patients with retinal pathologies following cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical charts of thirty-three eyes with retinal pathologies and 100 healthy eyes that underwent cataract extraction with implantation of an EDOF IOL and had at least 3 weeks of postoperative follow-up were retrospectively included. Patients' overall satisfaction, spectacle dependence, visual perception, and side effects were evaluated with a self-reported questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean uncorrected visual acuities (LogMAR) were significantly better in the healthy eyes compared with the eyes with retinal pathologies: 0.05 and 0.10, p = 0.011 (distance), 0.06 and 0.16, p = 0.001 (intermediate), and 0.20 and 0.28, p = 0.026 (near), respectively. No or rare use of spectacles for any distance was reported by 71% and 38% of patients, respectively (p = 0.004). Haloes/glare were reported by 17% and 23%, respectively (p = 0.556); only in 7% and 4% it was clinically disturbing (p &gt; 0.999). The same IOL would be chosen again in 77% and 73% of patients, respectively, (p = 0.550).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with retinal pathologies who were implanted with an EDOF IOL demonstrated excellent distant uncorrected visual results with reasonable intermediate and near uncorrected visual results alongside high satisfaction; however, results were inferior to those of the control healthy eyes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19595,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":"241-250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) offers improved near and intermediate vision, aiming to reduce spectacle dependence in cataract patients. This research aimed to evaluate the performance of EDOF IOL in patients with retinal pathologies following cataract surgery.

Methods: The medical charts of thirty-three eyes with retinal pathologies and 100 healthy eyes that underwent cataract extraction with implantation of an EDOF IOL and had at least 3 weeks of postoperative follow-up were retrospectively included. Patients' overall satisfaction, spectacle dependence, visual perception, and side effects were evaluated with a self-reported questionnaire.

Results: Mean uncorrected visual acuities (LogMAR) were significantly better in the healthy eyes compared with the eyes with retinal pathologies: 0.05 and 0.10, p = 0.011 (distance), 0.06 and 0.16, p = 0.001 (intermediate), and 0.20 and 0.28, p = 0.026 (near), respectively. No or rare use of spectacles for any distance was reported by 71% and 38% of patients, respectively (p = 0.004). Haloes/glare were reported by 17% and 23%, respectively (p = 0.556); only in 7% and 4% it was clinically disturbing (p > 0.999). The same IOL would be chosen again in 77% and 73% of patients, respectively, (p = 0.550).

Conclusion: Patients with retinal pathologies who were implanted with an EDOF IOL demonstrated excellent distant uncorrected visual results with reasonable intermediate and near uncorrected visual results alongside high satisfaction; however, results were inferior to those of the control healthy eyes.

延展焦距眼内透镜在已有视网膜疾病的眼睛中的性能。
简介延伸聚焦深度(EDOF)眼内人工晶体(IOL)可改善近距离和中距离视力,旨在减少白内障患者对眼镜的依赖。本研究旨在评估 EDOF 人工晶体在白内障手术后视网膜病变患者中的表现:方法:回顾性纳入了 33 例视网膜病变患者和 100 例健康患者的病历,这些患者均接受了白内障摘除术,并植入了 EDOF 人工晶体,术后随访至少 3 周。通过自我报告问卷对患者的总体满意度、眼镜依赖性、视觉感知和副作用进行了评估:结果:健康眼的平均未矫正视力(LogMAR)明显优于视网膜病变眼:远视力分别为 0.05 和 0.10,p=0.011;中视力分别为 0.06 和 0.16,p=0.001;近视力分别为 0.20 和 0.28,p=0.026。分别有 71% 和 38% 的患者表示在任何距离都不戴或很少戴眼镜(p=0.004)。分别有 17% 和 23% 的患者报告有光晕/眩光(p=0.556);只有 7% 和 4% 的患者报告有光晕/眩光对临床造成干扰(p>0.999)。分别有 77% 和 73% 的患者会再次选择相同的人工晶体(p=0.550):结论:视网膜病变患者植入 EDOF IOL 后,远距离未矫正视力效果极佳,中近距离未矫正视力效果也不错,满意度较高;但效果不如健康对照眼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1899, ''Ophthalmologica'' has become a frequently cited guide to international work in clinical and experimental ophthalmology. It contains a selection of patient-oriented contributions covering the etiology of eye diseases, diagnostic techniques, and advances in medical and surgical treatment. Straightforward, factual reporting provides both interesting and useful reading. In addition to original papers, ''Ophthalmologica'' features regularly timely reviews in an effort to keep the reader well informed and updated. The large international circulation of this journal reflects its importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信