Is Australia ready for the rollout of amyloid-targeting therapies for Alzheimer's disease? Results from a national survey characterising current infrastructure capability, workforce and training needs of memory and cognition clinics

Johannes C Michaelian, Christopher C Rowe, Susan E Kurrle, Constance Dimity Pond, Michael Woodward, Sharon L Naismith
{"title":"Is Australia ready for the rollout of amyloid-targeting therapies for Alzheimer's disease? Results from a national survey characterising current infrastructure capability, workforce and training needs of memory and cognition clinics","authors":"Johannes C Michaelian, Christopher C Rowe, Susan E Kurrle, Constance Dimity Pond, Michael Woodward, Sharon L Naismith","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.05.24309974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: New amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are currently under review by the Therapeutic Goods Administration for use in Australia.\nAims: To determine the infrastructure, workforce and training needs of Australian memory and cognition clinics to characterise health system preparedness for amyloid-targeting mAb therapies for AD.\nMethods: A national, cross-sectional online survey of medical specialists was conducted.\nResults: Thirty medical specialists (Geriatricians, n=23; Psychiatrists, n=4; Neurologists, n=3) from 30 different clinics participated (public, 76.7%; private, 23.3%), including metropolitan (73.3%), regional (20.0%) and rural (6.7%) areas. On average, clinics reported assessing 5.4 (SD=3.2) new patients per week, of which 2.4 (range: 0-5) were considered to have Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Only 40% of clinics use biomarkers to assess whether patients with MCI have AD, and 55% have intravenous infusion capability. While the majority of clinicians were confident in their knowledge of mAbs, only 33% felt confident in using these. Identified impediments to clinical implementation included a) lack of real-world experience; b) lack of current Models of Care and appropriate use guidelines; c) current clinic set-up; and d) information about safety.\nConclusions: Australia's health system preparedness for amyloid-targeting mAb therapies will require further investment in infrastructure, equity of access, clinician training and support. Long wait-times already impact access to clinics, and with the forecast rise in MCI and dementia cases, services will need to be expanded; while appropriate models of care and clear and efficient inter-sector health pathways will be needed to prepare for the use of mAbs.","PeriodicalId":501025,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.05.24309974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are currently under review by the Therapeutic Goods Administration for use in Australia. Aims: To determine the infrastructure, workforce and training needs of Australian memory and cognition clinics to characterise health system preparedness for amyloid-targeting mAb therapies for AD. Methods: A national, cross-sectional online survey of medical specialists was conducted. Results: Thirty medical specialists (Geriatricians, n=23; Psychiatrists, n=4; Neurologists, n=3) from 30 different clinics participated (public, 76.7%; private, 23.3%), including metropolitan (73.3%), regional (20.0%) and rural (6.7%) areas. On average, clinics reported assessing 5.4 (SD=3.2) new patients per week, of which 2.4 (range: 0-5) were considered to have Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Only 40% of clinics use biomarkers to assess whether patients with MCI have AD, and 55% have intravenous infusion capability. While the majority of clinicians were confident in their knowledge of mAbs, only 33% felt confident in using these. Identified impediments to clinical implementation included a) lack of real-world experience; b) lack of current Models of Care and appropriate use guidelines; c) current clinic set-up; and d) information about safety. Conclusions: Australia's health system preparedness for amyloid-targeting mAb therapies will require further investment in infrastructure, equity of access, clinician training and support. Long wait-times already impact access to clinics, and with the forecast rise in MCI and dementia cases, services will need to be expanded; while appropriate models of care and clear and efficient inter-sector health pathways will be needed to prepare for the use of mAbs.
澳大利亚是否已准备好推出治疗阿尔茨海默病的淀粉样蛋白靶向疗法?记忆与认知诊所当前基础设施能力、员工队伍和培训需求的全国性调查结果
背景:目的:确定澳大利亚记忆和认知诊所的基础设施、员工队伍和培训需求,以描述医疗系统为治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)的淀粉样蛋白靶向单克隆抗体(mAb)疗法所做的准备:对医学专家进行了一次全国性横断面在线调查:来自 30 家不同诊所的 30 名医学专家(老年病学家,23 人;精神病学家,4 人;神经病学家,3 人)参与了调查(公立诊所,76.7%;私立诊所,23.3%),其中包括大都市(73.3%)、地区(20.0%)和农村(6.7%)地区。诊所平均每周评估 5.4 名(SD=3.2)新患者,其中 2.4 名(范围:0-5)被认为患有轻度认知功能障碍 (MCI)。只有 40% 的诊所使用生物标志物来评估 MCI 患者是否患有 AD,55% 的诊所具备静脉输液能力。虽然大多数临床医生对自己了解的 mAbs 有信心,但只有 33% 的人对使用这些药物有信心。已确定的临床实施障碍包括:a)缺乏实际经验;b)缺乏当前的护理模式和适当使用指南;c)当前的诊所设置;以及d)有关安全性的信息:结论:澳大利亚医疗系统对淀粉样蛋白靶向 mAb 疗法的准备工作需要在基础设施、公平就医、临床医师培训和支持方面进一步投资。漫长的候诊时间已经影响了患者的就诊,随着 MCI 和痴呆症病例的预计增加,将需要扩大服务范围;同时还需要适当的护理模式和清晰高效的跨部门医疗路径,为使用 mAb 做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信