The Cambridge Questionnaire for Apathy and Impulsivity Traits (CamQUAIT): a novel assessment tool for frontotemporal lobar degeneration-related syndromes

Claire J Lansdall, Rebecca Susan Williams, Ian Coyle-Gilchrist, Alexander G Murley, Matthew A Rouse, Andrew Bateman, James B Rowe
{"title":"The Cambridge Questionnaire for Apathy and Impulsivity Traits (CamQUAIT): a novel assessment tool for frontotemporal lobar degeneration-related syndromes","authors":"Claire J Lansdall, Rebecca Susan Williams, Ian Coyle-Gilchrist, Alexander G Murley, Matthew A Rouse, Andrew Bateman, James B Rowe","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.01.24309762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State of the Art: Apathy and impulsivity are common in syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). They are associated with high carer distress and poor patient outcomes. There are limited treatment options and progress has been hindered by a lack of appropriate outcome measures. This study aimed to develop a carer-rated questionnaire oriented to people with syndromes associated with FTLD. Methodology: Principal component and Rasch analysis were conducted on carer-, clinician- and patient-reported questionnaires and performance-based tests of behavioural change in the Pick′s Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Prevalence and Incidence (PiPPIN) study. We identified two key components which informed subsequent item development for a novel scale which we call the Cambridge Questionnaire for Apathy and Impulsivity Traits (CamQUAIT). The resulting scale comprised two subscales assessing ″motivation and support″ (CamQUAIT-M) and ″impulsivity and challenging behaviours″ (CamQUAIT-C). An independent sample of 132 carers for people with FTLD-associated syndromes completed the CamQUAIT, along with a battery of existing measures. The CamQUAIT was reduced to 15 items following Rasch analysis.\nResults: Both subscales showed good construct validity as assessed by high Person separation index (CamQUAIT-M=0.9; CamQUAIT-C=0.7) and Cronbach′s alpha (CamQUAIT-M=0.9; CamQUAIT-C=0.8). The subscales correlated moderately with each other (r=0.376, p<0.001), and with existing measures of behavioural change. Conclusion: The CamQUAIT is a targeted measurement tool to assess apathy, impulsivity, and related behavioural change in the context of FTLD-related syndromes. The scale demonstrates good measurement properties and is sensitive to group differences, providing a suitable outcome measure to evaluate novel symptomatic treatments.","PeriodicalId":501025,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.01.24309762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

State of the Art: Apathy and impulsivity are common in syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). They are associated with high carer distress and poor patient outcomes. There are limited treatment options and progress has been hindered by a lack of appropriate outcome measures. This study aimed to develop a carer-rated questionnaire oriented to people with syndromes associated with FTLD. Methodology: Principal component and Rasch analysis were conducted on carer-, clinician- and patient-reported questionnaires and performance-based tests of behavioural change in the Pick′s Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Prevalence and Incidence (PiPPIN) study. We identified two key components which informed subsequent item development for a novel scale which we call the Cambridge Questionnaire for Apathy and Impulsivity Traits (CamQUAIT). The resulting scale comprised two subscales assessing ″motivation and support″ (CamQUAIT-M) and ″impulsivity and challenging behaviours″ (CamQUAIT-C). An independent sample of 132 carers for people with FTLD-associated syndromes completed the CamQUAIT, along with a battery of existing measures. The CamQUAIT was reduced to 15 items following Rasch analysis. Results: Both subscales showed good construct validity as assessed by high Person separation index (CamQUAIT-M=0.9; CamQUAIT-C=0.7) and Cronbach′s alpha (CamQUAIT-M=0.9; CamQUAIT-C=0.8). The subscales correlated moderately with each other (r=0.376, p<0.001), and with existing measures of behavioural change. Conclusion: The CamQUAIT is a targeted measurement tool to assess apathy, impulsivity, and related behavioural change in the context of FTLD-related syndromes. The scale demonstrates good measurement properties and is sensitive to group differences, providing a suitable outcome measure to evaluate novel symptomatic treatments.
剑桥冷漠和冲动特质问卷(CamQUAIT):额颞叶变性相关综合征的新型评估工具
研究现状:冷漠和冲动是额颞叶变性(FTLD)相关综合征的常见症状。它们与照顾者的高度痛苦和患者的不良预后有关。目前的治疗方案有限,而且缺乏适当的结果测量方法,阻碍了治疗的进展。本研究旨在为患有与前额叶变性相关的综合征的患者制定一份由照护者评分的调查问卷。研究方法:在皮克病和进行性核上麻痹患病率和发病率(PiPPIN)研究中,对护理者、临床医生和患者报告的问卷以及基于行为变化的表现测试进行了主成分和拉施分析。我们确定了两个关键要素,为随后的新量表项目开发提供了依据,我们称之为剑桥冷漠和冲动特质问卷(CamQUAIT)。量表由两个子量表组成,分别评估 "动机和支持"(CamQUAIT-M)和 "冲动和挑战行为"(CamQUAIT-C)。由 132 名 FTLD 相关综合症患者的照顾者组成的独立样本完成了 CamQUAIT 以及一系列现有的测量方法。经过 Rasch 分析,CamQUAIT 被缩减为 15 个项目:两个分量表都显示出良好的建构效度,这体现在较高的人员分离指数(CamQUAIT-M=0.9;CamQUAIT-C=0.7)和Cronbach′s alpha(CamQUAIT-M=0.9;CamQUAIT-C=0.8)上。各分量表之间存在中度相关性(r=0.376,p<0.001),并与现有的行为变化测量方法存在中度相关性。结论CamQUAIT 是一种有针对性的测量工具,可用于评估与 FTLD 相关综合征有关的冷漠、冲动和相关行为变化。该量表具有良好的测量特性,对群体差异非常敏感,是评估新型症状治疗方法的合适结果测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信