Is the use of Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol effective in the treatment of Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws or for the treatment of medicationosteonecrosis of the jaw? An overview

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"Is the use of Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol effective in the treatment of Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws or for the treatment of medicationosteonecrosis of the jaw? An overview","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of the present study was to determine the methodological quality of systematic reviews<span> that evaluated the effectiveness of pentoxifylline<span> and tocopherol<span><span> (PENTO) in the treatment of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) and medication-related </span>osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Searches were performed in Databases including PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, DARE, Cochrane Library, and SIGLE through OpenGrey until March 2024, were evaluated by two independent reviewers to answer the following question: Is the use of PENTO protocol effective in the treatment of ORNJ or for the treatment of MRONJ?</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 256 articles were initially identified; however, following the use of appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria, five systematic reviews were identified for detailed analysis. The final study sample comprised 588 patients: 397 patients with ORN and 197 patients with MRONJ who were treated with PENTO. The total recovery of individuals who used the PENTO protocol was 62,2 % for ORN and 100 % for MRONJ, with a follow-up period of 1 month to 10 years. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool, in which four were of low quality and 1 moderate quality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p><span>The treatment of ORN and MRONJ with pentoxifylline and </span>tocopherol<span> has shown good results in the studies presented, with a partial or total reduction in bone exposure. However, the low quality of the relevant reports highlights the need for primary and secondary studies with better methodological rigor to reduce bias and provide reassurance for this treatment option.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"125 5","pages":"Article 101959"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524002052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to determine the methodological quality of systematic reviews that evaluated the effectiveness of pentoxifylline and tocopherol (PENTO) in the treatment of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).

Methods

Searches were performed in Databases including PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, DARE, Cochrane Library, and SIGLE through OpenGrey until March 2024, were evaluated by two independent reviewers to answer the following question: Is the use of PENTO protocol effective in the treatment of ORNJ or for the treatment of MRONJ?

Results

A total of 256 articles were initially identified; however, following the use of appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria, five systematic reviews were identified for detailed analysis. The final study sample comprised 588 patients: 397 patients with ORN and 197 patients with MRONJ who were treated with PENTO. The total recovery of individuals who used the PENTO protocol was 62,2 % for ORN and 100 % for MRONJ, with a follow-up period of 1 month to 10 years. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool, in which four were of low quality and 1 moderate quality.

Conclusion

The treatment of ORN and MRONJ with pentoxifylline and tocopherol has shown good results in the studies presented, with a partial or total reduction in bone exposure. However, the low quality of the relevant reports highlights the need for primary and secondary studies with better methodological rigor to reduce bias and provide reassurance for this treatment option.

使用喷托维林和生育酚治疗颌骨坏死或药物性颌骨坏死是否有效?综述。
目的:本研究旨在确定评估喷托维林和生育酚(PENTO)治疗颌骨坏死(ORNJ)和药物相关性颌骨坏死(MRONJ)有效性的系统性综述的方法学质量:通过 OpenGrey 在 PubMed、Scopus、LILACS、DARE、Cochrane Library 和 SIGLE 等数据库中进行检索,直至 2024 年 3 月,并由两名独立审稿人进行评估,以回答以下问题:使用 PENTO 方案治疗 ORNJ 或 MRONJ 是否有效?最初共确定了 256 篇文章;但在使用适当的纳入和排除标准后,确定了五篇系统综述进行详细分析。最终的研究样本包括 588 名患者:其中,397 名 ORN 患者和 197 名 MRONJ 患者接受了 PENTO 治疗。使用 PENTO 方案治疗 ORN 的总康复率为 62.2%,治疗 MRONJ 的总康复率为 100%,随访时间从 1 个月到 10 年不等。研究的方法学质量采用 AMSTAR 2 工具进行评估,其中 4 项为低质量,1 项为中等质量:结论:使用喷托维林和生育酚治疗 ORN 和 MRONJ 的研究结果显示效果良好,部分或全部减少了骨暴露。然而,相关报告的质量较低,这凸显出有必要开展方法更严谨的一级和二级研究,以减少偏倚并为这种治疗方案提供保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信