The Utility and Feasibility of Smart Glasses in Spine Surgery: Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurospine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI:10.14245/ns.2448090.045
Yoshiaki Hiranaka, Yoshiki Takeoka, Takashi Yurube, Takeru Tsujimoto, Yutaro Kanda, Kunihiko Miyazaki, Hiroki Ohnishi, Tomoya Matsuo, Masao Ryu, Naotoshi Kumagai, Kohei Kuroshima, Ryosuke Kuroda, Kenichiro Kakutani
{"title":"The Utility and Feasibility of Smart Glasses in Spine Surgery: Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion.","authors":"Yoshiaki Hiranaka, Yoshiki Takeoka, Takashi Yurube, Takeru Tsujimoto, Yutaro Kanda, Kunihiko Miyazaki, Hiroki Ohnishi, Tomoya Matsuo, Masao Ryu, Naotoshi Kumagai, Kohei Kuroshima, Ryosuke Kuroda, Kenichiro Kakutani","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448090.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spine surgeons are often at risk of radiation exposure due to intraoperative fluoroscopy, leading to health concerns such as carcinogenesis. This is due to the increasing use of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) in spinal surgeries, resulting from the widespread adoption of minimally invasive spine stabilization. This study aimed to elucidate the effectiveness of smart glasses (SG) in PPS insertion under fluoroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SG were used as an alternative screen for fluoroscopic images. Operators A (2-year experience in spine surgery) and B (9-year experience) inserted the PPS into the bilateral L1-5 pedicles of the lumbar model bone under fluoroscopic guidance, repeating this procedure twice with and without SG (groups SG and N-SG, respectively). Each vertebral body's insertion time, radiation dose, and radiation exposure time were measured, and the deviation in screw trajectories was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The groups SG and N-SG showed no significant difference in insertion time for the overall procedure and each operator. However, group SG had a significantly shorter radiation exposure time than group N-SG for the overall procedure (109.1 ± 43.5 seconds vs. 150.9 ± 38.7 seconds; p = 0.003) and operator A (100.0 ± 29.0 seconds vs. 157.9 ± 42.8 seconds; p = 0.003). The radiation dose was also significantly lower in group SG than in group N-SG for the overall procedure (1.3 ± 0.6 mGy vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 mGy; p = 0.023) and operator A (1.2 ± 0.4 mGy vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 mGy; p = 0.013). The 2 groups showed no significant difference in screw deviation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of SG in fluoroscopic imaging for PPS insertion holds potential as a useful method for reducing radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448090.045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Spine surgeons are often at risk of radiation exposure due to intraoperative fluoroscopy, leading to health concerns such as carcinogenesis. This is due to the increasing use of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) in spinal surgeries, resulting from the widespread adoption of minimally invasive spine stabilization. This study aimed to elucidate the effectiveness of smart glasses (SG) in PPS insertion under fluoroscopy.

Methods: SG were used as an alternative screen for fluoroscopic images. Operators A (2-year experience in spine surgery) and B (9-year experience) inserted the PPS into the bilateral L1-5 pedicles of the lumbar model bone under fluoroscopic guidance, repeating this procedure twice with and without SG (groups SG and N-SG, respectively). Each vertebral body's insertion time, radiation dose, and radiation exposure time were measured, and the deviation in screw trajectories was evaluated.

Results: The groups SG and N-SG showed no significant difference in insertion time for the overall procedure and each operator. However, group SG had a significantly shorter radiation exposure time than group N-SG for the overall procedure (109.1 ± 43.5 seconds vs. 150.9 ± 38.7 seconds; p = 0.003) and operator A (100.0 ± 29.0 seconds vs. 157.9 ± 42.8 seconds; p = 0.003). The radiation dose was also significantly lower in group SG than in group N-SG for the overall procedure (1.3 ± 0.6 mGy vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 mGy; p = 0.023) and operator A (1.2 ± 0.4 mGy vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 mGy; p = 0.013). The 2 groups showed no significant difference in screw deviation.

Conclusion: The application of SG in fluoroscopic imaging for PPS insertion holds potential as a useful method for reducing radiation exposure.

智能眼镜在脊柱手术中的实用性和可行性:最大限度减少经皮椎弓根螺钉植入过程中的辐射暴露
目的:脊柱外科医生往往面临术中透视所带来的辐射风险,从而引发致癌等健康问题。这是由于微创脊柱稳定技术的广泛应用,经皮椎弓根螺钉(PPS)在脊柱手术中的使用越来越多。本研究旨在阐明智能眼镜(SG)在透视下插入 PPS 的有效性:方法:使用智能眼镜作为透视图像的替代屏幕。操作者 A(2 年脊柱手术经验)和 B(9 年手术经验)在透视引导下将 PPS 插入双侧腰椎模型骨的 L1-5 椎弓根,在有 SG 和无 SG 的情况下重复此过程两次(分别为 SG 组和 N-SG 组)。测量每个椎体的插入时间、辐射剂量和辐射照射时间,并评估螺钉轨迹的偏差:结果:SG 组和 N-SG 组在整个手术和每个操作者的插入时间上没有明显差异。然而,在整个手术过程(109.1 ± 43.5 秒 vs. 150.9 ± 38.7 秒;p = 0.003)和操作者 A(100.0 ± 29.0 秒 vs. 157.9 ± 42.8 秒;p = 0.003)中,SG 组的辐射照射时间明显短于 N-SG 组。在整个手术过程(1.3 ± 0.6 mGy vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 mGy;p = 0.023)和操作者 A(1.2 ± 0.4 mGy vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 mGy;p = 0.013)中,SG 组的辐射剂量也明显低于 N-SG 组。两组在螺钉偏差方面无明显差异:结论:在 PPS 插入透视成像中应用 SG 有可能成为减少辐射暴露的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信