Velocity dependence of sensory reweighting in human balance control.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1152/jn.00075.2024
Kyle J Missen, Mark G Carpenter, Lorenz Assländer
{"title":"Velocity dependence of sensory reweighting in human balance control.","authors":"Kyle J Missen, Mark G Carpenter, Lorenz Assländer","doi":"10.1152/jn.00075.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relative contributions of proprioceptive, vestibular, and visual sensory cues to balance control change depending on their availability and reliability. This sensory reweighting is classically supported by nonlinear sway responses to increasing visual surround and/or surface tilt amplitudes. However, recent evidence indicates that visual cues are reweighted based on visual tilt velocity rather than tilt amplitude. Therefore, we designed a study to specifically test the hypothesized velocity dependence of reweighting while expanding on earlier findings for visual reweighting by testing proprioceptive reweighting for standing balance on a tilting surface. Twenty healthy young adults stood with their eyes closed on a toes-up/-down tilting platform. We designed four pseudorandom tilt sequences with either a slow (S) or a fast (F) tilt velocity and different peak-to-peak amplitudes. We used model-based interpretations of measured sway characteristics to estimate the proprioceptive sensory weight (<i>W</i><sub>prop</sub>) within each trial. In addition, root-mean-square values of measured body center of mass sway amplitude (RMS) and velocity (RMSv) were calculated for each tilt sequence. <i>W</i><sub>prop</sub>, RMS, and RMSv values varied depending on the stimulus velocity, exhibiting large effects (all Cohen's <i>d</i> >1.10). In contrast, we observed no significant differences across stimulus amplitudes for <i>W</i><sub>prop</sub> (Cohen's <i>d</i>: 0.02-0.16) and, compared with the differences in velocity, there were much smaller changes in RMS and RMSv values (Cohen's <i>d</i>: 0.05-0.91). These results confirmed the hypothesized velocity, rather than amplitude, dependence of sensory reweighting.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This novel study examined the velocity dependence of sensory reweighting for human balance control using support surface tilt stimuli with independently varied amplitude and velocity. Estimates of the proprioceptive contribution to standing balance, derived from model-based interpretations of sway characteristics, showed greater sensitivity to changes in surface tilt velocity than surface tilt amplitude. These results support a velocity-based mechanism underlying sensory reweighting for human balance control.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00075.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relative contributions of proprioceptive, vestibular, and visual sensory cues to balance control change depending on their availability and reliability. This sensory reweighting is classically supported by nonlinear sway responses to increasing visual surround and/or surface tilt amplitudes. However, recent evidence indicates that visual cues are reweighted based on visual tilt velocity rather than tilt amplitude. Therefore, we designed a study to specifically test the hypothesized velocity dependence of reweighting while expanding on earlier findings for visual reweighting by testing proprioceptive reweighting for standing balance on a tilting surface. Twenty healthy young adults stood with their eyes closed on a toes-up/-down tilting platform. We designed four pseudorandom tilt sequences with either a slow (S) or a fast (F) tilt velocity and different peak-to-peak amplitudes. We used model-based interpretations of measured sway characteristics to estimate the proprioceptive sensory weight (Wprop) within each trial. In addition, root-mean-square values of measured body center of mass sway amplitude (RMS) and velocity (RMSv) were calculated for each tilt sequence. Wprop, RMS, and RMSv values varied depending on the stimulus velocity, exhibiting large effects (all Cohen's d >1.10). In contrast, we observed no significant differences across stimulus amplitudes for Wprop (Cohen's d: 0.02-0.16) and, compared with the differences in velocity, there were much smaller changes in RMS and RMSv values (Cohen's d: 0.05-0.91). These results confirmed the hypothesized velocity, rather than amplitude, dependence of sensory reweighting.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This novel study examined the velocity dependence of sensory reweighting for human balance control using support surface tilt stimuli with independently varied amplitude and velocity. Estimates of the proprioceptive contribution to standing balance, derived from model-based interpretations of sway characteristics, showed greater sensitivity to changes in surface tilt velocity than surface tilt amplitude. These results support a velocity-based mechanism underlying sensory reweighting for human balance control.

人体平衡控制中的感觉再加权与速度有关。
本体感觉、前庭感觉和视觉感觉线索对平衡控制的相对贡献会因它们的可用性和可靠性而改变。这种感觉的重新加权在经典上是由视觉环绕和/或表面倾斜幅度增加时的非线性摇摆反应所支持的。然而,最近的证据表明,视觉线索是根据视觉倾斜速度而不是倾斜幅度来重新加权的。因此,我们设计了一项研究,专门测试重新加权的速度依赖性假设,同时通过测试倾斜表面上站立平衡的本体感觉重新加权,扩展了早期视觉重新加权的研究结果。20 名健康的年轻人闭着眼睛站在一个脚趾向上/向下倾斜的平台上。我们设计了四种伪随机倾斜序列,倾斜速度为慢(S)或快(F),峰-峰振幅各不相同。我们使用基于模型的测量摇摆特性解释来估算每次试验中的本体感觉重量(Wprop)。此外,我们还计算了每个倾斜序列中测得的身体质心摇摆幅度(RMS)和速度(RMSv)的均方根值。Wprop、RMS 和 RMSv 值随着刺激速度的不同而变化,表现出很大的影响(所有 Cohen's d's > 1.10)。相反,我们观察到 Wprop 在不同刺激幅度下没有显著差异(Cohen's d's:0.02-0.16),与速度差异相比,RMS 和 RMSv 值的变化要小得多(Cohen's d's:0.05-0.91)。这些结果证实了感觉再加权依赖于速度而非振幅的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信