Effect of Dry and Wet Fractionation on Nutritional and Physicochemical Properties of Faba Bean and Yellow Pea Protein

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Legume Science Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1002/leg3.244
Ziqi Li, Valeria Messina, Daniel J. Skylas, Peter Valtchev, Chris Whiteway, Shu Cheng, Timothy A. G. Langrish, Ken J. Quail, Fariba Dehghani
{"title":"Effect of Dry and Wet Fractionation on Nutritional and Physicochemical Properties of Faba Bean and Yellow Pea Protein","authors":"Ziqi Li,&nbsp;Valeria Messina,&nbsp;Daniel J. Skylas,&nbsp;Peter Valtchev,&nbsp;Chris Whiteway,&nbsp;Shu Cheng,&nbsp;Timothy A. G. Langrish,&nbsp;Ken J. Quail,&nbsp;Fariba Dehghani","doi":"10.1002/leg3.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plant-based proteins continue to gain popularity as a sustainable alternative to animal proteins due to their nutritional, functional and health benefits. Dry and wet fractionation methods are increasingly being used for the production of value-added pulse protein ingredients. The objective of this study was to compare the nutritional properties, protein quality, physicochemical properties and secondary structure of Australian faba bean and yellow pea protein concentrates and protein isolates obtained by dry and wet fractionation. Amino acid scores highlighted that faba bean and yellow pea protein isolates and concentrates were deficient in the sulphur-containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine and tryptophan. Faba bean (63.7%) and yellow pea protein (63.0%) isolates had higher in vitro protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores compared to the protein concentrates, being 50.7% and 54.4%, respectively. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy revealed different secondary structures between protein concentrates and isolates, especially for the amide I region. Faba bean and yellow pea protein concentrates had higher protein solubility (46.2% and 50.1%, respectively) and higher foaming capacity (65% and 59%, respectively) compared to the protein isolates. Water-holding capacity was higher for faba bean and yellow pea protein isolates, being 4.3% and 4.0 g/g, respectively. These findings demonstrate that faba bean and yellow pea protein concentrates and isolates have unique functional properties that can be exploited for use in a diverse range of new and existing food applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17929,"journal":{"name":"Legume Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leg3.244","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legume Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leg3.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-based proteins continue to gain popularity as a sustainable alternative to animal proteins due to their nutritional, functional and health benefits. Dry and wet fractionation methods are increasingly being used for the production of value-added pulse protein ingredients. The objective of this study was to compare the nutritional properties, protein quality, physicochemical properties and secondary structure of Australian faba bean and yellow pea protein concentrates and protein isolates obtained by dry and wet fractionation. Amino acid scores highlighted that faba bean and yellow pea protein isolates and concentrates were deficient in the sulphur-containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine and tryptophan. Faba bean (63.7%) and yellow pea protein (63.0%) isolates had higher in vitro protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores compared to the protein concentrates, being 50.7% and 54.4%, respectively. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy revealed different secondary structures between protein concentrates and isolates, especially for the amide I region. Faba bean and yellow pea protein concentrates had higher protein solubility (46.2% and 50.1%, respectively) and higher foaming capacity (65% and 59%, respectively) compared to the protein isolates. Water-holding capacity was higher for faba bean and yellow pea protein isolates, being 4.3% and 4.0 g/g, respectively. These findings demonstrate that faba bean and yellow pea protein concentrates and isolates have unique functional properties that can be exploited for use in a diverse range of new and existing food applications.

Abstract Image

干法和湿法分馏对法巴豆和黄豌豆蛋白质营养和理化特性的影响
植物蛋白因其营养、功能和健康益处,作为动物蛋白的一种可持续替代品,不断受到人们的青睐。干法和湿法分馏法正越来越多地用于生产增值的脉动蛋白成分。本研究的目的是比较澳大利亚蚕豆和黄豌豆蛋白质浓缩物以及通过干法和湿法分馏法获得的蛋白质分离物的营养特性、蛋白质质量、理化特性和二级结构。氨基酸评分显示,蚕豆和黄豌豆蛋白质分离物和浓缩物缺乏含硫氨基酸、蛋氨酸、半胱氨酸和色氨酸。与浓缩蛋白相比,蚕豆蛋白分离物(63.7%)和黄豌豆蛋白分离物(63.0%)的体外蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸得分较高,分别为 50.7% 和 54.4%。傅立叶变换红外光谱显示,浓缩蛋白和分离蛋白的二级结构不同,尤其是酰胺 I 区。与蛋白质分离物相比,咖啡豆和黄豌豆浓缩蛋白具有更高的蛋白质溶解度(分别为 46.2% 和 50.1%)和更高的发泡能力(分别为 65% 和 59%)。蚕豆和黄豌豆蛋白分离物的保水能力较高,分别为 4.3% 和 4.0 g/g。这些研究结果表明,蚕豆和黄豌豆蛋白浓缩物和分离物具有独特的功能特性,可用于各种新的和现有的食品应用中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Legume Science
Legume Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信