Surgical Technique and Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain in Patients Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernioplasty in Portugal: A Prospective Multicentric Cohort Study.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
{"title":"Surgical Technique and Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain in Patients Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernioplasty in Portugal: A Prospective Multicentric Cohort Study.","authors":"","doi":"10.20344/amp.20277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence about the advantage of Lichtenstein's repair, the guidelines' recommended technique, is scarce regarding postoperative chronic inguinal pain (CPIP). The primary aim of this study was to compare CPIP in patients undergoing Lichtenstein versus other techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective multicentric cohort study including consecutive adults undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair in Portuguese hospitals (October - December 2019). Laparoscopic and mesh-free hernia repairs were excluded. The primary outcome was postoperative pain at three months, defined as a score of ≥ 3/10 in the European Hernia Society Quality of Life score pain domain. The secondary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight hundred and sixty-nine patients from 33 hospitals were included. Most were men (90.4%) and had unilateral hernias (88.6%). Overall, 53.6% (466/869) underwent Lichtenstein's repair, and 46.4% (403/869) were treated with other techniques, of which 83.9% (338/403) were plug and patch. The overall rate of CPIP was 16.6% and 12.2% of patients had surgical complications. The unadjusted risk was similar for CPIP (OR 0.76, p = 0.166, CI 0.51 - 1.12) and postoperative complications (OR 1.06, p = 0.801, CI 0.69 - 1.60) between Lichtenstein and other techniques. After adjustment, the risk was also similar for CPIP (OR 0.83, p = 0.455, CI 0.51 - 1.34) and postoperative complications (OR 1.14, p = 0.584, CI 0.71 - 1.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Lichtenstein technique was not associated with lower CPIP and showed comparable surgical complications. Further investigation as- sessing long term outcomes is necessary to fully assess the benefits of the Lichtenstein technique regarding CPIP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7059,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica portuguesa","volume":"37 7-8","pages":"507-517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.20277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence about the advantage of Lichtenstein's repair, the guidelines' recommended technique, is scarce regarding postoperative chronic inguinal pain (CPIP). The primary aim of this study was to compare CPIP in patients undergoing Lichtenstein versus other techniques.

Methods: Prospective multicentric cohort study including consecutive adults undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair in Portuguese hospitals (October - December 2019). Laparoscopic and mesh-free hernia repairs were excluded. The primary outcome was postoperative pain at three months, defined as a score of ≥ 3/10 in the European Hernia Society Quality of Life score pain domain. The secondary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications.

Results: Eight hundred and sixty-nine patients from 33 hospitals were included. Most were men (90.4%) and had unilateral hernias (88.6%). Overall, 53.6% (466/869) underwent Lichtenstein's repair, and 46.4% (403/869) were treated with other techniques, of which 83.9% (338/403) were plug and patch. The overall rate of CPIP was 16.6% and 12.2% of patients had surgical complications. The unadjusted risk was similar for CPIP (OR 0.76, p = 0.166, CI 0.51 - 1.12) and postoperative complications (OR 1.06, p = 0.801, CI 0.69 - 1.60) between Lichtenstein and other techniques. After adjustment, the risk was also similar for CPIP (OR 0.83, p = 0.455, CI 0.51 - 1.34) and postoperative complications (OR 1.14, p = 0.584, CI 0.71 - 1.84).

Conclusion: The Lichtenstein technique was not associated with lower CPIP and showed comparable surgical complications. Further investigation as- sessing long term outcomes is necessary to fully assess the benefits of the Lichtenstein technique regarding CPIP.

葡萄牙开放式腹股沟疝成形术患者的手术技术与术后慢性腹股沟疼痛:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
导言:Lichtenstein修复术是指南推荐的技术,但关于术后慢性腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)的证据却很少。本研究的主要目的是比较接受 Lichtenstein 与其他技术的患者的 CPIP:前瞻性多中心队列研究,包括在葡萄牙医院接受选择性腹股沟疝修补术的连续成人(2019 年 10 月至 12 月)。不包括腹腔镜和无网片疝修补术。主要结果是术后三个月的疼痛,定义为欧洲疝气协会生活质量评分疼痛域得分≥3/10。次要结果是术后 30 天的并发症:结果:共纳入了来自 33 家医院的 869 名患者。大多数患者为男性(90.4%),单侧疝气(88.6%)。总体而言,53.6%(466/869)的患者接受了利希滕斯坦修补术,46.4%(403/869)的患者接受了其他技术治疗,其中 83.9%(338/403)的患者接受了堵塞和修补术。CPIP的总发生率为16.6%,12.2%的患者出现了手术并发症。未经调整的 CPIP(OR 0.76,P = 0.166,CI 0.51 - 1.12)和术后并发症(OR 1.06,P = 0.801,CI 0.69 - 1.60)风险在 Lichtenstein 和其他技术之间相似。经调整后,CPIP(OR 0.83,P = 0.455,CI 0.51 - 1.34)和术后并发症(OR 1.14,P = 0.584,CI 0.71 - 1.84)的风险也相似:结论:Lichtenstein 技术与较低的 CPIP 无关,手术并发症也相当。要全面评估 Lichtenstein 技术对 CPIP 的益处,有必要对长期结果进行进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta medica portuguesa
Acta medica portuguesa MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Acta Médica Portuguesa is to publish original research and review articles in biomedical areas of the highest standard, covering several domains of medical knowledge, with the purpose to help doctors improve medical care. In order to accomplish these aims, Acta Médica Portuguesa publishes original articles, review articles, case reports and editorials, among others, with a focus on clinical, scientific, social, political and economic factors affecting health. Acta Médica Portuguesa will be happy to consider manuscripts for publication from authors anywhere in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信