Conservative treatment of sexual dysfunction among men undergoing prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Isadora Martins da Fonseca Pedroso, Maria Luíza Souza Siqueira, Thaísy Andressa Bastos Primo de Sousa Santos, Keyla de Paula Barbosa, Elio Armando Nunes de Lima, Andréia Cristina Ribeiro Izidro Sampaio, Katiane da Costa Cunha, Marianne Lucena da Silva, Aline Teixeira Alves
{"title":"Conservative treatment of sexual dysfunction among men undergoing prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review.","authors":"Isadora Martins da Fonseca Pedroso, Maria Luíza Souza Siqueira, Thaísy Andressa Bastos Primo de Sousa Santos, Keyla de Paula Barbosa, Elio Armando Nunes de Lima, Andréia Cristina Ribeiro Izidro Sampaio, Katiane da Costa Cunha, Marianne Lucena da Silva, Aline Teixeira Alves","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qeae045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One of the changes caused by pelvic cancers is the decrease in patients' sexual function, which influences their quality of life (QoL) during and after treatment. Sexual dysfunction (SD) is associated with severe ejaculatory dysfunction, sexual dissatisfaction, reduced libido and sexual desire, decreased intensity of orgasm, difficulty in erection, and lower sexual frequency.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of conservative treatments (nonsurgical and nonpharmacologic) for SD in males with pelvic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were performed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro, Embase, and VHL databases in September 2023 by using MeSH terms related to population, study design, intervention, and outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only prostate cancer studies were included due to a lack of studies in other treatments. Studies used pelvic floor muscle training (8 studies); biofeedback (1 study); a penile vibrator (1 study); electrostimulation (2 studies); shock wave therapy (2 studies); aerobic, resistance, and flexibility exercises (2 studies); and a vacuum erection device (1 study). All articles assessed sexual function and reported improvements in the intervention group, including 5 with no differences between the groups. Articles involving shock wave therapy described improvements in SD but were not clinically relevant. Studies evaluating QoL reported benefits in the experimental groups. Adverse effects of a vacuum erection device and penile vibrator were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conservative treatments are more effective than others in treating SD in men with prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to assess the unwanted effects of these treatments. In this study, we found evidence that this type of therapy improves sexual function and QoL in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":" ","pages":"710-719"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: One of the changes caused by pelvic cancers is the decrease in patients' sexual function, which influences their quality of life (QoL) during and after treatment. Sexual dysfunction (SD) is associated with severe ejaculatory dysfunction, sexual dissatisfaction, reduced libido and sexual desire, decreased intensity of orgasm, difficulty in erection, and lower sexual frequency.

Objectives: This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of conservative treatments (nonsurgical and nonpharmacologic) for SD in males with pelvic cancer.

Methods: Systematic searches were performed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro, Embase, and VHL databases in September 2023 by using MeSH terms related to population, study design, intervention, and outcome.

Results: Only prostate cancer studies were included due to a lack of studies in other treatments. Studies used pelvic floor muscle training (8 studies); biofeedback (1 study); a penile vibrator (1 study); electrostimulation (2 studies); shock wave therapy (2 studies); aerobic, resistance, and flexibility exercises (2 studies); and a vacuum erection device (1 study). All articles assessed sexual function and reported improvements in the intervention group, including 5 with no differences between the groups. Articles involving shock wave therapy described improvements in SD but were not clinically relevant. Studies evaluating QoL reported benefits in the experimental groups. Adverse effects of a vacuum erection device and penile vibrator were reported.

Conclusion: Conservative treatments are more effective than others in treating SD in men with prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to assess the unwanted effects of these treatments. In this study, we found evidence that this type of therapy improves sexual function and QoL in this population.

前列腺癌男性患者性功能障碍的保守治疗:系统综述。
简介盆腔癌症导致的变化之一是患者性功能下降,这影响了他们在治疗期间和治疗后的生活质量(QoL)。性功能障碍(SD)与严重的射精功能障碍、性不满、性欲和性欲减退、性高潮强度降低、勃起困难和性生活频率降低有关:本系统综述调查了保守治疗(非手术和非药物)对男性盆腔癌症患者SD的有效性:方法:2023 年 9 月在 Cochrane Library、PubMed、CINAHL、PEDro、Embase 和 VHL 数据库中使用与人群、研究设计、干预和结果相关的 MeSH 术语进行了系统检索:由于缺乏其他治疗方法的研究,因此只纳入了前列腺癌的研究。研究使用了盆底肌肉训练(8 项研究)、生物反馈(1 项研究)、阴茎振动器(1 项研究)、电刺激(2 项研究)、冲击波疗法(2 项研究)、有氧运动、阻力运动和柔韧性运动(2 项研究)以及真空勃起装置(1 项研究)。所有文章都对性功能进行了评估,并报告了干预组的改善情况,其中 5 篇文章的干预组之间没有差异。涉及冲击波疗法的文章描述了SD的改善情况,但与临床无关。对 QoL 进行评估的研究报告称,实验组的患者受益匪浅。真空勃起器和阴茎振动器的不良反应也有报道:结论:在治疗前列腺癌男性患者的 SD 方面,保守疗法比其他疗法更有效。结论:在治疗前列腺癌男性患者的 SD 方面,保守疗法比其他疗法更有效,但还需要进一步的研究来评估这些疗法的不良反应。在这项研究中,我们发现有证据表明,这种疗法可以改善这类人群的性功能和 QoL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual medicine reviews
Sexual medicine reviews UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信