Romantic relationships and type 2 diabetes: The role of invisible social control.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Health Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1037/hea0001383
Hannah A Brownlee, Emily C Soriano, M James Lenhard, Alyssa L Fenech, Michael Morreale, Scott D Siegel, Niall Bolger, Jean-Philippe Laurenceau
{"title":"Romantic relationships and type 2 diabetes: The role of invisible social control.","authors":"Hannah A Brownlee, Emily C Soriano, M James Lenhard, Alyssa L Fenech, Michael Morreale, Scott D Siegel, Niall Bolger, Jean-Philippe Laurenceau","doi":"10.1037/hea0001383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether invisible social control provided by a romantic partner is associated with improved objective glucose outcomes for patients with Type 2 diabetes. Social control reflects a partner's attempt to modify or influence a patient's health behaviors. We hypothesized that the best outcome for all continuous glucose monitoring measures would be captured by an interaction condition reflecting invisible social control.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with Type 2 diabetes and their partners (<i>N</i> = 63 couples) completed an 8-day daily diary period between 2016 and 2017. Self-report measures of social control receipt and provision were obtained each evening from patients and partners and patients wore a continuous glucose monitor throughout the diary period. Outcomes of daily glucose mean, standard deviation, time in range, and coefficient of variation were computed and two-way interactions between social control receipt and social control provision were probed and plotted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two-way interaction significantly predicted daily glucose mean, standard deviation, and time in range, such that when patients reported no social control receipt, but partners reported social control provision, patients showed improvements in objective glucose measures. We found no significant effect for coefficient of variation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study was the first to use an invisible social control framework to examine the daily dyadic associations between partner social control provision, patient social control receipt, and four objectively measured continuous glucose monitoring outcomes. Findings suggest that the visibility of social control provided by a romantic partner may be predictive of glycemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether invisible social control provided by a romantic partner is associated with improved objective glucose outcomes for patients with Type 2 diabetes. Social control reflects a partner's attempt to modify or influence a patient's health behaviors. We hypothesized that the best outcome for all continuous glucose monitoring measures would be captured by an interaction condition reflecting invisible social control.

Method: Patients with Type 2 diabetes and their partners (N = 63 couples) completed an 8-day daily diary period between 2016 and 2017. Self-report measures of social control receipt and provision were obtained each evening from patients and partners and patients wore a continuous glucose monitor throughout the diary period. Outcomes of daily glucose mean, standard deviation, time in range, and coefficient of variation were computed and two-way interactions between social control receipt and social control provision were probed and plotted.

Results: The two-way interaction significantly predicted daily glucose mean, standard deviation, and time in range, such that when patients reported no social control receipt, but partners reported social control provision, patients showed improvements in objective glucose measures. We found no significant effect for coefficient of variation.

Conclusions: This study was the first to use an invisible social control framework to examine the daily dyadic associations between partner social control provision, patient social control receipt, and four objectively measured continuous glucose monitoring outcomes. Findings suggest that the visibility of social control provided by a romantic partner may be predictive of glycemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

恋爱关系与 2 型糖尿病:隐形社会控制的作用
研究目的本研究旨在确定恋爱伴侣提供的隐形社会控制是否与 2 型糖尿病患者客观血糖结果的改善有关。社会控制反映了伴侣试图改变或影响患者的健康行为。我们假设,反映无形社会控制的互动条件将捕捉到所有连续血糖监测指标的最佳结果:2型糖尿病患者及其伴侣(N = 63对)在2016年至2017年间完成了为期8天的每日日记。每天晚上从患者和伴侣处获得关于接受和提供社会控制的自我报告测量,患者在整个日记期间佩戴连续血糖监测仪。结果计算了每日血糖平均值、标准差、在范围内的时间和变异系数,并探究和绘制了社会控制接受和社会控制提供之间的双向交互作用:结果:双向交互作用对每日血糖平均值、标准偏差和在范围内的时间有明显的预测作用,因此,当患者报告未接受社会控制,但伴侣报告提供了社会控制时,患者的客观血糖指标会有所改善。我们发现变异系数没有明显影响:本研究首次使用了隐形社会控制框架来研究伴侣提供社会控制、患者接受社会控制和四种客观测量的连续血糖监测结果之间的日常关系。研究结果表明,恋爱伴侣提供的社会控制的可见性可能会预测 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制情况。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信