Global brain connectivity: Test-retest stability and association with biological and neurocognitive variables

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Gianpaolo Del Mauro, Yiran Li, Ze Wang
{"title":"Global brain connectivity: Test-retest stability and association with biological and neurocognitive variables","authors":"Gianpaolo Del Mauro,&nbsp;Yiran Li,&nbsp;Ze Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Global brain connectivity (GBC) enables measuring brain regions’ functional connectivity strength at rest by computing the average correlation between each brain voxel’s time-series and that of all other voxels.</p></div><div><h3>New method</h3><p>We used resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data of young adult participants from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset to explore the test-retest stability of GBC, the brain regions with higher or lower GBC, as well as the associations of this measure with age, sex, and fluid intelligence. GBC was computed by considering separately the positive and negative correlation coefficients (positive GBC and negative GBC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Test-retest stability was higher for positive compared to negative GBC. Areas with higher GBC were located in the default mode network, insula, and visual areas, while regions with lower GBC were in subcortical regions, temporal cortex, and cerebellum. Higher age was related to global reduction of positive GBC. Males displayed higher positive GBC in the whole brain. Fluid intelligence was associated to increased positive GBC in fronto-parietal, occipital and temporal regions.</p></div><div><h3>Comparison with Existing Method</h3><p>Compared to previous works, this study adopted a larger sample size and tested GBC stability using data from different rs-fMRI sessions. Moreover, these associations were examined by testing positive and negative GBC separately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Lower stability for negative compared to positive GBC suggests that negative correlations may reflect less stable couplings between brain regions. Our findings indicate a greater importance of positive compared to negative GBC for the associations of functional connectivity strength with biological and neurocognitive variables.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"409 ","pages":"Article 110205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016502702400150X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Global brain connectivity (GBC) enables measuring brain regions’ functional connectivity strength at rest by computing the average correlation between each brain voxel’s time-series and that of all other voxels.

New method

We used resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data of young adult participants from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset to explore the test-retest stability of GBC, the brain regions with higher or lower GBC, as well as the associations of this measure with age, sex, and fluid intelligence. GBC was computed by considering separately the positive and negative correlation coefficients (positive GBC and negative GBC).

Results

Test-retest stability was higher for positive compared to negative GBC. Areas with higher GBC were located in the default mode network, insula, and visual areas, while regions with lower GBC were in subcortical regions, temporal cortex, and cerebellum. Higher age was related to global reduction of positive GBC. Males displayed higher positive GBC in the whole brain. Fluid intelligence was associated to increased positive GBC in fronto-parietal, occipital and temporal regions.

Comparison with Existing Method

Compared to previous works, this study adopted a larger sample size and tested GBC stability using data from different rs-fMRI sessions. Moreover, these associations were examined by testing positive and negative GBC separately.

Conclusions

Lower stability for negative compared to positive GBC suggests that negative correlations may reflect less stable couplings between brain regions. Our findings indicate a greater importance of positive compared to negative GBC for the associations of functional connectivity strength with biological and neurocognitive variables.

全球大脑连通性:测试重复稳定性以及与生物和神经认知变量的关联。
背景:全局脑连接(Global brain connectivity,GBC)通过计算每个脑象素的时间序列与所有其他象素的时间序列之间的平均相关性来测量大脑区域在静息状态下的功能连接强度:我们利用人类连接组计划(HCP)数据集中年轻成年参与者的静息态 fMRI(rs-fMRI)数据,探讨了 GBC 的测试-再测试稳定性、GBC 较高或较低的脑区,以及该指标与年龄、性别和流体智力的关联。GBC的计算方法是分别考虑正相关系数和负相关系数(正GBC和负GBC):结果:与负GBC相比,正GBC的测试再测稳定性更高。GBC较高的区域位于默认模式网络、脑岛和视觉区域,而GBC较低的区域位于皮层下区域、颞叶皮层和小脑。年龄越大,GBC 阳性区域越少。男性在整个大脑中显示出更高的正GBC。与现有方法的比较:与之前的研究相比,本研究采用了更大的样本量,并使用不同的rs-fMRI数据测试了GBC的稳定性。此外,还分别测试了阳性和阴性 GBC:结论:与正向 GBC 相比,负向 GBC 的稳定性较低,这表明负向相关性可能反映了大脑区域之间不太稳定的耦合。我们的研究结果表明,在功能连接强度与生物和神经认知变量的关联中,正性 GBC 比负性 GBC 更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信