Institutional food safety risk communication – A self-evaluation tool and its interpretation

IF 15.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Gyula Kasza , Tekla Izsó , Solveig Langsrud , Domagoj Vrbos , Nina Veflen , Øydis Ueland , Joachim Scholderer , Lars Münter , Eszter Csenki , Dávid Szakos , James Ramsay , Miklós Süth
{"title":"Institutional food safety risk communication – A self-evaluation tool and its interpretation","authors":"Gyula Kasza ,&nbsp;Tekla Izsó ,&nbsp;Solveig Langsrud ,&nbsp;Domagoj Vrbos ,&nbsp;Nina Veflen ,&nbsp;Øydis Ueland ,&nbsp;Joachim Scholderer ,&nbsp;Lars Münter ,&nbsp;Eszter Csenki ,&nbsp;Dávid Szakos ,&nbsp;James Ramsay ,&nbsp;Miklós Süth","doi":"10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Food safety risk communication is part of the risk analysis methodology and plays an important role in the increasingly complex food system. Besides shaping consumer risk awareness, risk perception and risk behaviour, risk communication also affects the reputation of the food safety authorities, being especially important for securing operational stability and budget of the concerned organisations. A recent European study highlighted a high variance in risk communication preparedness of official institutions in EU member countries.</p></div><div><h3>Scope and approach</h3><p>This paper presents a benchmarking instrument, the Self-evaluation Tool for Risk Communication (SET), designed for food safety authorities. SET helps decision-makers to receive a quick assessment of their preparedness level for risk communication by comparing it with international best practices.</p></div><div><h3>Key findings and conclusions</h3><p>SET divides risk communication competencies into three domains: Human capacities, Organisational management, and Risk communication activities. Several elements are assessed in each domain, evaluated on a scale from 0 to 3. The results are delivered instantly, benchmarking the scores in terms of domains and the individual elements. The data wheel visualization highlights strengths and weaknesses and points out logical improvement options for the organisation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":441,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Food Science & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092422442400270X/pdfft?md5=4a299b8405306db3a5459668a1ad63db&pid=1-s2.0-S092422442400270X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Food Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092422442400270X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Food safety risk communication is part of the risk analysis methodology and plays an important role in the increasingly complex food system. Besides shaping consumer risk awareness, risk perception and risk behaviour, risk communication also affects the reputation of the food safety authorities, being especially important for securing operational stability and budget of the concerned organisations. A recent European study highlighted a high variance in risk communication preparedness of official institutions in EU member countries.

Scope and approach

This paper presents a benchmarking instrument, the Self-evaluation Tool for Risk Communication (SET), designed for food safety authorities. SET helps decision-makers to receive a quick assessment of their preparedness level for risk communication by comparing it with international best practices.

Key findings and conclusions

SET divides risk communication competencies into three domains: Human capacities, Organisational management, and Risk communication activities. Several elements are assessed in each domain, evaluated on a scale from 0 to 3. The results are delivered instantly, benchmarking the scores in terms of domains and the individual elements. The data wheel visualization highlights strengths and weaknesses and points out logical improvement options for the organisation.

机构食品安全风险交流--自我评估工具及其释义
背景食品安全风险交流是风险分析方法的一部分,在日益复杂的食品系统中发挥着重要作用。除了影响消费者的风险意识、风险认知和风险行为外,风险交流还影响食品安全当局的声誉,对确保相关组织的业务稳定性和预算尤为重要。最近的一项欧洲研究强调了欧盟成员国官方机构在风险交流准备方面的巨大差异。本文介绍了一种基准工具,即风险交流自我评估工具(SET),专为食品安全当局设计。通过与国际最佳实践进行比较,SET 可帮助决策者快速评估其风险交流准备水平:人的能力、组织管理和风险交流活动。对每个领域的若干要素都进行了评估,评估等级从 0 到 3。数据轮可视化突出了组织的优势和劣势,并指出了合理的改进方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Trends in Food Science & Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
32.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
322
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Trends in Food Science & Technology is a prestigious international journal that specializes in peer-reviewed articles covering the latest advancements in technology, food science, and human nutrition. It serves as a bridge between specialized primary journals and general trade magazines, providing readable and scientifically rigorous reviews and commentaries on current research developments and their potential applications in the food industry. Unlike traditional journals, Trends in Food Science & Technology does not publish original research papers. Instead, it focuses on critical and comprehensive reviews to offer valuable insights for professionals in the field. By bringing together cutting-edge research and industry applications, this journal plays a vital role in disseminating knowledge and facilitating advancements in the food science and technology sector.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信