Utility of Thrombectomy in Nonagenarians: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Neurology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1159/000539789
Benjamin P Sugar, Nathan E Drasler, Jonathan Lee, Bryce D Beutler, Alastair E Moody, John Jay P Cadavona, Lisa Leung, Burton J Tabaac
{"title":"Utility of Thrombectomy in Nonagenarians: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Benjamin P Sugar, Nathan E Drasler, Jonathan Lee, Bryce D Beutler, Alastair E Moody, John Jay P Cadavona, Lisa Leung, Burton J Tabaac","doi":"10.1159/000539789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy represents a mainstay of management for acute ischemic stroke in the setting of large vessel occlusion. However, there are no clinical practice guidelines defining the role of thrombectomy at the extremes of age. In this scoping review, we aimed to summarize the existing medical and neurosurgical literature pertaining to mechanical thrombectomy in nonagenarians. The PubMed database was queried using the following terms and relevant citations assessed: \"thrombectomy nonagenarian,\" \"thrombectomy age 90,\" \"stroke nonagenarian,\" and \"ischemic stroke thrombectomy.\" Common measurable outcomes, including mortality, modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scale score, were utilized to compare results.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Thrombectomy was shown to improve functional outcomes in all eight of the studies included in the analysis. Mortality was assessed in only two reported studies, and thrombectomy was shown to provide a mortality benefit in 1 study among patients for whom first-pass reperfusion was achieved. Other outcomes of reported interest included greater early neurologic recovery at discharge and improved functional outcomes at 90 days among nonagenarians who underwent thrombectomy as compared to those who received thrombolytic therapy alone. Nonagenarians with good functional status at baseline were the most likely to have favorable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy improves outcomes among nonagenarians presenting with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to optimize patient selection and develop clinical practice guidelines specific to this important patient demographic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"122-129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy represents a mainstay of management for acute ischemic stroke in the setting of large vessel occlusion. However, there are no clinical practice guidelines defining the role of thrombectomy at the extremes of age. In this scoping review, we aimed to summarize the existing medical and neurosurgical literature pertaining to mechanical thrombectomy in nonagenarians. The PubMed database was queried using the following terms and relevant citations assessed: "thrombectomy nonagenarian," "thrombectomy age 90," "stroke nonagenarian," and "ischemic stroke thrombectomy." Common measurable outcomes, including mortality, modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scale score, were utilized to compare results.

Summary: Thrombectomy was shown to improve functional outcomes in all eight of the studies included in the analysis. Mortality was assessed in only two reported studies, and thrombectomy was shown to provide a mortality benefit in 1 study among patients for whom first-pass reperfusion was achieved. Other outcomes of reported interest included greater early neurologic recovery at discharge and improved functional outcomes at 90 days among nonagenarians who underwent thrombectomy as compared to those who received thrombolytic therapy alone. Nonagenarians with good functional status at baseline were the most likely to have favorable outcomes.

Key messages: Mechanical thrombectomy improves outcomes among nonagenarians presenting with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to optimize patient selection and develop clinical practice guidelines specific to this important patient demographic.

血栓切除术在非老年人中的实用性:范围界定综述。
背景:在大血管闭塞的情况下,机械性血栓切除术是治疗急性缺血性卒中的主要方法。然而,目前还没有临床实践指南明确血栓切除术在极端年龄段的作用。在这篇范围综述中,我们旨在总结现有医学和神经外科文献中有关非老年患者机械性血栓切除术的内容。我们使用以下术语对 PubMed 数据库进行了查询,并对相关引文进行了评估:"非长者血栓切除术"、"90 岁血栓切除术"、"非长者中风 "和 "缺血性中风血栓切除术"。总结:纳入分析的所有 8 项研究均显示血栓切除术可改善功能预后。仅有两项研究对死亡率进行了评估,其中一项研究显示血栓切除术可降低首次再灌注患者的死亡率。其他值得关注的结果包括,与单纯接受溶栓治疗的患者相比,接受血栓切除术的非老年患者在出院时神经功能恢复得更快,90 天后的功能状况也有所改善。基线功能状态良好的非长者最有可能获得良好的治疗效果:关键信息:对于因大血管闭塞导致急性缺血性卒中的非老年人,机械取栓术可改善预后。有必要进一步开展大规模前瞻性研究,以优化患者选择,并针对这一重要患者群体制定临床实践指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Neurology
European Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信