Diabetes mellitus and female sexual response: what do animal models tell us?

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Abigail Karina Hernández-Munive, Mildred Berenice Molina-Leonor, Brenda Denisse Ayala-González, Joanna Vázquez-Andrade, Alberto Medina-Nieto, Alonso Fernández-Guasti
{"title":"Diabetes mellitus and female sexual response: what do animal models tell us?","authors":"Abigail Karina Hernández-Munive, Mildred Berenice Molina-Leonor, Brenda Denisse Ayala-González, Joanna Vázquez-Andrade, Alberto Medina-Nieto, Alonso Fernández-Guasti","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qeae044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the less explored effects of diabetes mellitus (DM) is female sexual dysfunction. Females of different species have been used as models.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze the information of animal models of DM and female sexual response (FSR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature of FSR in models of DM was reviewed.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Paradigm- and diabetes-dependent changes have been found in various aspects of the FSR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females in a type 1 DM (DM1) model show a decrease in the number of proestrus events, and ovariectomized females treated with sex hormones have been used. In these females, a reduction in lordosis has been reported; in proceptivity, the data are contradictory. These females present a decrease in sexual motivation that was restored after exogenous insulin. In the type 2 DM (DM2) model, females show regular estrous cycles, normal levels of lordosis behavior, and, depending on the paradigm, decreased proceptivity. These females display normal preference for sexually active males or their olfactory cues when having free physical contact; they lose this preference when tested in paradigms where physical interaction is precluded.</p><p><strong>Clinical translation: </strong>Preclinical data showing the high deleterious effects of a DM1 model and the less drastic effects under a DM2 model are in accordance with clinical data revealing a much higher prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women with DM1 than DM2.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>The main strength is the analysis of the changes in various components of FSR in 2 models of DM. The main limitation is the difficulty in extrapolating the data on FSR from rats to women and that most studies focus on evaluating the impact of severe or chronic-moderate hyperglycemia/hyperinsulinemia on the sexual response, without considering other pathophysiologic alterations generated by DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Females with severe hyperglycemia have a decrease in FSR, while those with moderate hyperglycemia show much less drastic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":" ","pages":"542-550"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the less explored effects of diabetes mellitus (DM) is female sexual dysfunction. Females of different species have been used as models.

Aim: To analyze the information of animal models of DM and female sexual response (FSR).

Methods: The literature of FSR in models of DM was reviewed.

Outcomes: Paradigm- and diabetes-dependent changes have been found in various aspects of the FSR.

Results: Females in a type 1 DM (DM1) model show a decrease in the number of proestrus events, and ovariectomized females treated with sex hormones have been used. In these females, a reduction in lordosis has been reported; in proceptivity, the data are contradictory. These females present a decrease in sexual motivation that was restored after exogenous insulin. In the type 2 DM (DM2) model, females show regular estrous cycles, normal levels of lordosis behavior, and, depending on the paradigm, decreased proceptivity. These females display normal preference for sexually active males or their olfactory cues when having free physical contact; they lose this preference when tested in paradigms where physical interaction is precluded.

Clinical translation: Preclinical data showing the high deleterious effects of a DM1 model and the less drastic effects under a DM2 model are in accordance with clinical data revealing a much higher prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women with DM1 than DM2.

Strengths and limitations: The main strength is the analysis of the changes in various components of FSR in 2 models of DM. The main limitation is the difficulty in extrapolating the data on FSR from rats to women and that most studies focus on evaluating the impact of severe or chronic-moderate hyperglycemia/hyperinsulinemia on the sexual response, without considering other pathophysiologic alterations generated by DM.

Conclusion: Females with severe hyperglycemia have a decrease in FSR, while those with moderate hyperglycemia show much less drastic effects.

糖尿病与女性性反应:动物模型能告诉我们什么?
背景:女性性功能障碍是糖尿病(DM)较少探讨的影响之一。目的:分析 DM 动物模型和女性性反应(FSR)的信息:方法:对DM模型中女性性反应的文献进行回顾:结果:在FSR的各个方面发现了范例和糖尿病依赖性变化:结果:1型DM(DM1)模型中的雌性发情次数减少,使用性激素治疗的卵巢切除雌性发情次数也减少。有报告称,这些女性的前倾幅度减小;而在感知力方面,数据则相互矛盾。这些女性的性动机下降,但在外源性胰岛素治疗后又恢复了。在 2 型糖尿病(DM2)模型中,雌性表现出规律的发情周期、正常水平的脊柱前凸行为,并且根据范式的不同,感知能力也有所下降。在自由身体接触时,这些雌性动物对性活跃的雄性动物或它们的嗅觉线索表现出正常的偏好;在排除身体互动的范例中进行测试时,它们会失去这种偏好:临床前数据显示,DM1模型的有害影响较大,而DM2模型的影响较小,这与临床数据相符,临床数据显示,患有DM1的女性性功能障碍发生率远高于DM2:主要优点是分析了两种DM模型中FSR各组成部分的变化。主要局限性是很难将大鼠的 FSR 数据推断到女性身上,而且大多数研究都侧重于评估严重或慢性中度高血糖/高胰岛素血症对性反应的影响,而没有考虑 DM 引起的其他病理生理变化:结论:患有严重高血糖症的女性会降低性反应频率,而患有中度高血糖症的女性受到的影响要小得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual medicine reviews
Sexual medicine reviews UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信