Prevalence and Risk Factors for Metamorphopsia after Successful Retinal Detachment Surgery.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1159/000539430
Geoffrey Pastor, Julia Salleron, Astrid Zessler, Sarah Stoebener, Karine Angioi-Duprez, Jean-Paul Berrod, Jean-Baptiste Conart
{"title":"Prevalence and Risk Factors for Metamorphopsia after Successful Retinal Detachment Surgery.","authors":"Geoffrey Pastor, Julia Salleron, Astrid Zessler, Sarah Stoebener, Karine Angioi-Duprez, Jean-Paul Berrod, Jean-Baptiste Conart","doi":"10.1159/000539430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of metamorphopsia following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery, as well as associated predictive factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 107 eyes successfully operated for RRD underwent metamorphopsia severity assessment using M-CHARTS, and foveal microstructure analysis by spectral domain optical coherence tomography, at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression rendered evaluation of preoperative risk factors. The correlation between metamorphopsia score and outer retinal layer (ORL) integrity was investigated and preoperative risk factors evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of postoperative metamorphopsia decreased from 51.4 to 29.9% and the median metamorphopsia score significantly improved (0.5, 95% CI: 0.3; 0.9, to 0.2, 95% CI: 0; 0.5, p &lt; 0.001) from 1 to 6 months, respectively. Preoperative macular detachment was the only predictor found (OR 11.0, 95% CI: 3.1; 39.4, p &lt; 0.001). Metamorphopsia severity was significantly associated with outer nuclear layer thickness and the status of the ellipsoid and cone interdigitation zones. One-month M-CHARTS had 81% sensitivity and 87% specificity in predicting full metamorphopsia recovery at 6 months (0.45 cut-off score).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of metamorphopsia decreased in parallel to ORL restoration, thus demonstrating the etiological role of photoreceptor-level morphological changes. M-CHARTS allowed for monitoring and predicting metamorphopsia recovery after RRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19595,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of metamorphopsia following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery, as well as associated predictive factors.

Methods: A total of 107 eyes successfully operated for RRD underwent metamorphopsia severity assessment using M-CHARTS, and foveal microstructure analysis by spectral domain optical coherence tomography, at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression rendered evaluation of preoperative risk factors. The correlation between metamorphopsia score and outer retinal layer (ORL) integrity was investigated and preoperative risk factors evaluated.

Results: The prevalence of postoperative metamorphopsia decreased from 51.4 to 29.9% and the median metamorphopsia score significantly improved (0.5, 95% CI: 0.3; 0.9, to 0.2, 95% CI: 0; 0.5, p < 0.001) from 1 to 6 months, respectively. Preoperative macular detachment was the only predictor found (OR 11.0, 95% CI: 3.1; 39.4, p < 0.001). Metamorphopsia severity was significantly associated with outer nuclear layer thickness and the status of the ellipsoid and cone interdigitation zones. One-month M-CHARTS had 81% sensitivity and 87% specificity in predicting full metamorphopsia recovery at 6 months (0.45 cut-off score).

Conclusion: The prevalence of metamorphopsia decreased in parallel to ORL restoration, thus demonstrating the etiological role of photoreceptor-level morphological changes. M-CHARTS allowed for monitoring and predicting metamorphopsia recovery after RRD.

视网膜脱离手术成功后出现变形的发生率和风险因素。
简介:目的:确定流变性视网膜脱离(RRD)手术后变性的发生率以及相关预测因素:目的:确定流变性视网膜脱离(RRD)手术后变形的发生率以及相关的预测因素:共有 107 只成功接受 RRD 手术的眼睛在术后 1 个月和 6 个月接受了使用 M-CHARTS 进行的变形严重程度评估,以及使用光谱域光学相干断层扫描进行的眼窝微结构分析。单变量和多变量逻辑回归对术前风险因素进行了评估。研究了变形评分与视网膜外层(ORL)完整性之间的相关性,并对术前风险因素进行了评估:结果:术后变形发生率从 51.4% 降至 29.9%,中位变形评分从 1 t 到 6 个月分别显著改善(0.5,95% CI [0.3;0.9] 降至 0.2,95% CI [0;0.5],p<0.001)。术前黄斑脱离是唯一的预测因素(OR 11.0,95% CI [3.1;39.4],p<0.001)。变性视力的严重程度与核外层厚度、椭圆体和锥体交错区的状态明显相关。一个月的M-CHARTS在预测6个月时变性视力完全恢复方面具有81%的灵敏度和87%的特异性(0.45分界线):结论:随着视网膜视力的恢复,变色龙的发病率也在下降,这表明了感光器一级形态变化的致病作用。M-CHARTS可用于监测和预测RRD后的变形视恢复情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1899, ''Ophthalmologica'' has become a frequently cited guide to international work in clinical and experimental ophthalmology. It contains a selection of patient-oriented contributions covering the etiology of eye diseases, diagnostic techniques, and advances in medical and surgical treatment. Straightforward, factual reporting provides both interesting and useful reading. In addition to original papers, ''Ophthalmologica'' features regularly timely reviews in an effort to keep the reader well informed and updated. The large international circulation of this journal reflects its importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信