The Association between Retinal Thickness Fluctuations and Visual Outcomes under Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1159/000539648
Bhadra Pandya, Andrew Mihalache, Amin Hatamnejad, Justin Grad, Marko M Popovic, David T W Wong
{"title":"The Association between Retinal Thickness Fluctuations and Visual Outcomes under Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bhadra Pandya, Andrew Mihalache, Amin Hatamnejad, Justin Grad, Marko M Popovic, David T W Wong","doi":"10.1159/000539648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the association between retinal thickness (RT) fluctuations and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with neovascular AMD, macular edema secondary to RVO, and DME treated with anti-VEGF therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed from January 2006 to March 2024. Studies comparing visual or anatomic outcomes of patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy, stratified by magnitudes of RT fluctuation, were included. ROBINS-I and Cochrane RoB 2 tools were used to assess risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE criteria. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model. Primary outcomes were final BCVA and change in BCVA relative to baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15,725 articles were screened; 15 studies were identified in the systematic review and 5 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Final ETDRS VA was significantly worse in eyes with the highest level of RT fluctuation (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 7.86 letters; 95% CI, 4.97, 10.74; p &lt; 0.00001; I2 = 81%; 3,136 eyes). RT at last observation was significantly greater in eyes with high RT fluctuations (WMD = -27.35 μm; 95% CI, -0.04, 54.75; p = 0.05; I2 = 88%; 962 eyes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Final visual outcome is associated with magnitude of RT fluctuation over the course of therapy. It is unclear whether minimizing RT fluctuations would help optimize visual outcomes in patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy. These findings are limited by a small set of studies, risk of bias, and considerable heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19595,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":"261-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to examine the association between retinal thickness (RT) fluctuations and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with neovascular AMD, macular edema secondary to RVO, and DME treated with anti-VEGF therapy.

Methods: A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed from January 2006 to March 2024. Studies comparing visual or anatomic outcomes of patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy, stratified by magnitudes of RT fluctuation, were included. ROBINS-I and Cochrane RoB 2 tools were used to assess risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE criteria. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model. Primary outcomes were final BCVA and change in BCVA relative to baseline.

Results: 15,725 articles were screened; 15 studies were identified in the systematic review and 5 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Final ETDRS VA was significantly worse in eyes with the highest level of RT fluctuation (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 7.86 letters; 95% CI, 4.97, 10.74; p < 0.00001; I2 = 81%; 3,136 eyes). RT at last observation was significantly greater in eyes with high RT fluctuations (WMD = -27.35 μm; 95% CI, -0.04, 54.75; p = 0.05; I2 = 88%; 962 eyes).

Conclusions: Final visual outcome is associated with magnitude of RT fluctuation over the course of therapy. It is unclear whether minimizing RT fluctuations would help optimize visual outcomes in patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy. These findings are limited by a small set of studies, risk of bias, and considerable heterogeneity.

抗血管内皮生长因子疗法下视网膜厚度波动与视觉效果之间的关系:系统回顾与元分析》。
引言研究新生血管性AMD、继发于RVO的黄斑水肿以及接受抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的DME患者视网膜厚度(RT)波动与最佳矫正视力(BCVA)之间的关系:方法:2006 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月对 Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统检索。方法:从 2006 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月,对 OvidEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统性检索,纳入了比较抗血管内皮生长因子疗法患者视觉或解剖结果的研究,并按 RT 波动幅度进行了分层。采用 ROBINS-I 和 Cochrane RoB 2 工具评估偏倚风险,并根据 GRADE 标准评估证据的确定性。采用随机效应模型进行了 Meta 分析。主要结果为最终BCVA和BCVA相对于基线的变化:共筛选出 15725 篇文章;系统综述中确定了 15 项研究,荟萃分析中纳入了 5 项研究。RT波动水平最高的眼的最终ETDRS VA明显较差(加权平均差(WMD)=7.86个字母;95% CI,4.97,10.74;p <;0.00001;I² = 81%;3136只眼)。RT波动大的眼最后观察时的RT明显更大(WMD = -27.35 μm;95% CI,-0.04,54.75;p = 0.05;I2 = 88%;962只眼):最终视觉结果与治疗过程中RT的波动幅度有关。目前还不清楚最大限度地减少RT波动是否有助于优化接受抗VEGF治疗的患者的视觉预后。这些研究结果因研究数量少、存在偏倚风险以及异质性较大而受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1899, ''Ophthalmologica'' has become a frequently cited guide to international work in clinical and experimental ophthalmology. It contains a selection of patient-oriented contributions covering the etiology of eye diseases, diagnostic techniques, and advances in medical and surgical treatment. Straightforward, factual reporting provides both interesting and useful reading. In addition to original papers, ''Ophthalmologica'' features regularly timely reviews in an effort to keep the reader well informed and updated. The large international circulation of this journal reflects its importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信