Blended Implementation of Existing Precollege Engineering Programs: Teacher Perspectives of Program Impact

IF 2.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medha Dalal;Assad Iqbal;Adam R. Carberry
{"title":"Blended Implementation of Existing Precollege Engineering Programs: Teacher Perspectives of Program Impact","authors":"Medha Dalal;Assad Iqbal;Adam R. Carberry","doi":"10.1109/TE.2023.3338610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contribution: This work examines the impact of a unique precollege STEM education initiative during its two pilot years. The study contributes to the growing body of research by unpacking the needs of and the impact on an important stakeholder group (i.e., the teachers) in the engineering education ecosystem to help inform the future design and development of teacher professional learning models. Background: Efforts to provide precollege students with engineering or robotics-specific experiences are on the rise. These efforts are typically undertaken independently of one another. A first-of-its-kind collaboration between two precollege STEM initiatives aimed to break down existing silos between programs and offer a blended engineering and robotics curriculum targeting underserved schools. Research Questions: 1) How does a program designed to blend two existing engineering and robotics programs at the secondary school level impact teachers? and 2) What program elements are deemed valuable by participating teachers who are implementing a blended engineering and robotics program at the secondary school level? Methodology: Four focus groups were conducted with teachers (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n = 16) over a period of two years. Data was analyzed using open coding and constant comparison methods. Findings: Four themes of growing confidence, exercising agency, responsive professional development, and support structures emerged across the four datasets. Collectively these themes capture pragmatic understandings of offering a new, blended precollege STEM program and advance an argument for the involvement of all stakeholders to support the teachers.","PeriodicalId":55011,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10376265","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10376265/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contribution: This work examines the impact of a unique precollege STEM education initiative during its two pilot years. The study contributes to the growing body of research by unpacking the needs of and the impact on an important stakeholder group (i.e., the teachers) in the engineering education ecosystem to help inform the future design and development of teacher professional learning models. Background: Efforts to provide precollege students with engineering or robotics-specific experiences are on the rise. These efforts are typically undertaken independently of one another. A first-of-its-kind collaboration between two precollege STEM initiatives aimed to break down existing silos between programs and offer a blended engineering and robotics curriculum targeting underserved schools. Research Questions: 1) How does a program designed to blend two existing engineering and robotics programs at the secondary school level impact teachers? and 2) What program elements are deemed valuable by participating teachers who are implementing a blended engineering and robotics program at the secondary school level? Methodology: Four focus groups were conducted with teachers ( ${n}$ = 16) over a period of two years. Data was analyzed using open coding and constant comparison methods. Findings: Four themes of growing confidence, exercising agency, responsive professional development, and support structures emerged across the four datasets. Collectively these themes capture pragmatic understandings of offering a new, blended precollege STEM program and advance an argument for the involvement of all stakeholders to support the teachers.
现有大学预科工程学课程的混合实施:教师对课程影响的看法
贡献:这项研究考察了一项独特的大学前科学、技术、工程与数学(STEM)教育计划在试行的两年间所产生的影响。这项研究通过解读工程教育生态系统中一个重要利益相关者群体(即教师)的需求和影响,为未来教师专业学习模式的设计和发展提供参考,从而为不断增长的研究成果做出贡献。背景:为大学预科学生提供工程学或机器人学专门经验的努力正在增加。这些工作通常都是独立进行的。两项大学前科学、技术、工程与数学(STEM)计划之间的首次合作旨在打破现有计划之间的隔阂,为服务不足的学校提供混合工程和机器人课程。研究问题1) 一项旨在将两个现有的工程学和机器人学课程融合在一起的计划对中学教师有什么影响?研究方法:在两年时间里,与教师(${n}$ = 16)开展了四次焦点小组讨论。采用开放式编码和恒定比较法对数据进行分析。研究结果在四个数据集中出现了四个主题:增强信心、发挥能动性、顺应专业发展和支持结构。总的来说,这些主题捕捉到了对提供新的、混合式大学预科科学、技术、工程和数学课程的务实理解,并提出了所有利益相关者参与支持教师的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Education
IEEE Transactions on Education 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Education (ToE) publishes significant and original scholarly contributions to education in electrical and electronics engineering, computer engineering, computer science, and other fields within the scope of interest of IEEE. Contributions must address discovery, integration, and/or application of knowledge in education in these fields. Articles must support contributions and assertions with compelling evidence and provide explicit, transparent descriptions of the processes through which the evidence is collected, analyzed, and interpreted. While characteristics of compelling evidence cannot be described to address every conceivable situation, generally assessment of the work being reported must go beyond student self-report and attitudinal data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信