Effect of Polymer Infiltered Ceramic Surface Treatment Using Photoactivated Low-Level Laser Therapy, CO2 Laser, and Aluminum Oxide on Surface Roughness, Shear Bond Strength, and Color Change: An In vitro SEM EDX Analysis

IF 0.9 4区 材料科学
Saeed Awod Bin Hassan
{"title":"Effect of Polymer Infiltered Ceramic Surface Treatment Using Photoactivated Low-Level Laser Therapy, CO2 Laser, and Aluminum Oxide on Surface Roughness, Shear Bond Strength, and Color Change: An In vitro SEM EDX Analysis","authors":"Saeed Awod Bin Hassan","doi":"10.1166/sam.2024.4674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary surface conditioners (Sandblasting (SB), Self-etching ceramic primer (SECP), low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in conjunction with methylene blue photosensitizer (MBPS), Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser on the color change (ΔE), surface roughness (Ra) and\n bond strength of hybrid ceramic (HC) to resin cement. Hundred discs were prepared from HC which were surface treated (n = 15) Group 1: HFA(S), Group 2: SB, Group 3: SECP, Group 4: LLLT (MBPS), Group 5: CO2 laser. After surface conditioning, five samples from each group underwent\n ΔE and Ra analysis using a spectrophotometer and Profilometer respectively. Fifty specimens were applied with dual-cure resin luting cement. Specimens were thermocycled and underwent SBS and failure mode analysis using UTM and stereomicroscope. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of\n ΔE, Ra, and SBS were calculated using ANOVA. Intergroup comparisons were made using post hoc Tukey multiple comparisons. A maximum score of ΔE was observed in Group 5 samples (CO2 laser+HC). The minimum value of ΔE was displayed by Group 3 (SECP+HC) specimens.\n Group 2 (SB+HC) treated specimens that exhibited the highest Ra scores and SBS. Sandblasting and carbon dioxide laser-treated samples presented satisfactory outcomes of surface roughness and bond strength. However, Sandblasting and carbon dioxide laser groups presented significant changes\n in the color of the specimens.","PeriodicalId":21671,"journal":{"name":"Science of Advanced Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Advanced Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2024.4674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary surface conditioners (Sandblasting (SB), Self-etching ceramic primer (SECP), low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in conjunction with methylene blue photosensitizer (MBPS), Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser on the color change (ΔE), surface roughness (Ra) and bond strength of hybrid ceramic (HC) to resin cement. Hundred discs were prepared from HC which were surface treated (n = 15) Group 1: HFA(S), Group 2: SB, Group 3: SECP, Group 4: LLLT (MBPS), Group 5: CO2 laser. After surface conditioning, five samples from each group underwent ΔE and Ra analysis using a spectrophotometer and Profilometer respectively. Fifty specimens were applied with dual-cure resin luting cement. Specimens were thermocycled and underwent SBS and failure mode analysis using UTM and stereomicroscope. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of ΔE, Ra, and SBS were calculated using ANOVA. Intergroup comparisons were made using post hoc Tukey multiple comparisons. A maximum score of ΔE was observed in Group 5 samples (CO2 laser+HC). The minimum value of ΔE was displayed by Group 3 (SECP+HC) specimens. Group 2 (SB+HC) treated specimens that exhibited the highest Ra scores and SBS. Sandblasting and carbon dioxide laser-treated samples presented satisfactory outcomes of surface roughness and bond strength. However, Sandblasting and carbon dioxide laser groups presented significant changes in the color of the specimens.
使用光激活低强度激光疗法、二氧化碳激光和氧化铝进行聚合物渗透陶瓷表面处理对表面粗糙度、剪切结合强度和颜色变化的影响:体外 SEM EDX 分析
当代表面调节剂(喷砂 (SB)、自酸蚀陶瓷底漆 (SECP)、结合亚甲基蓝光敏剂的低强度激光疗法 (LLLT)、二氧化碳 (CO2) 激光)对混合陶瓷 (HC) 与树脂水泥的颜色变化 (ΔE)、表面粗糙度 (Ra) 和粘结强度的影响。从混合陶瓷中制备出 100 个经过表面处理的圆盘(n = 15),其中第 1 组:HFA(S);第 2 组:SB;第 3 组:SECP;第 4 组:LLLT (MBPS);第 5 组:CO2 激光。表面处理后,每组的五个试样分别使用分光光度计和轮廓仪进行ΔE 和 Ra 分析。50 个试样涂上了双固化树脂胶合剂。对试样进行热循环,并使用UTM和体视显微镜进行SBS和失效模式分析。使用方差分析计算ΔE、Ra 和 SBS 的平均值和标准偏差(SD)。组间比较采用事后 Tukey 多重比较法。第 5 组样本(CO2 激光+HC)的 ΔE 得分最高。第 3 组(SECP+HC)样本的 ΔE 值最小。第 2 组(SB+HC)处理过的试样显示出最高的 Ra 分数和 SBS。喷砂和二氧化碳激光处理的试样在表面粗糙度和粘接强度方面的结果令人满意。不过,喷砂组和二氧化碳激光组的试样颜色发生了显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of Advanced Materials
Science of Advanced Materials NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
4.4 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信