Large inter-individual variability in force-velocity profile changes in response to acute high-load resistance training.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Physiology international Pub Date : 2024-05-28 Print Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1556/2060.2024.00370
Gergely Pálinkás, Bettina Béres, Katinka Utczás, Zsófia Tróznai, Leonidas Petridis
{"title":"Large inter-individual variability in force-velocity profile changes in response to acute high-load resistance training.","authors":"Gergely Pálinkás, Bettina Béres, Katinka Utczás, Zsófia Tróznai, Leonidas Petridis","doi":"10.1556/2060.2024.00370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the acute effects of high-load resistance training on the force generating capacity of muscles have been widely examined, limited data exist on the relationship with the force-velocity profile (FV). Evidence suggests high sensitivity of the vertical FV profile to monitor changes in the muscle's mechanical properties according to the type of the exercise protocol. However, the interpretation of the findings seems not as straightforward. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a high-load resistance training protocol on the muscle's mechanical properties during loaded jumps and on the vertical force-velocity profile (FV) in relation to maximal strength.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>29 resistance-trained male (mean age±SD: 35.4 ± 7.8 years) and 29 female athletes (mean age±SD: 32.5 ± 7.0 years) participated in the study. Five-repetition maximum (5RM) in back squat, unloaded countermovement jump (CMJ) and FV profile were assessed. Loaded jumps were performed against 25, 50, 75, and 100 percent of body mass. Participants performed exercise protocols corresponding to their 5RM. Immediately after, unloaded CMJ and FV profile measurements were repeated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant decrease in CMJ height (∼5-6%) and in average power (∼4%) was recorded for both men and women. The FV profile did not change after the exercise protocol; however, there was a significant decrease in theoretical maximal power (from 4 to 5%) and in theoretical maximal velocity (∼3%). Maximal strength was not associated with the changes in FV profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that an acute high-load exercise decreased vertical jump performance and maximal power output, but without a concomitant change in FV profile. The large interindividual variability in FV measures indicates a less straightforward connection of the applied exercise with the acute response in the FV profile, highlighting the complexity of the FV profile to monitor changes in response to an acute training load.</p>","PeriodicalId":20058,"journal":{"name":"Physiology international","volume":" ","pages":"186-198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2060.2024.00370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While the acute effects of high-load resistance training on the force generating capacity of muscles have been widely examined, limited data exist on the relationship with the force-velocity profile (FV). Evidence suggests high sensitivity of the vertical FV profile to monitor changes in the muscle's mechanical properties according to the type of the exercise protocol. However, the interpretation of the findings seems not as straightforward. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a high-load resistance training protocol on the muscle's mechanical properties during loaded jumps and on the vertical force-velocity profile (FV) in relation to maximal strength.

Methods: 29 resistance-trained male (mean age±SD: 35.4 ± 7.8 years) and 29 female athletes (mean age±SD: 32.5 ± 7.0 years) participated in the study. Five-repetition maximum (5RM) in back squat, unloaded countermovement jump (CMJ) and FV profile were assessed. Loaded jumps were performed against 25, 50, 75, and 100 percent of body mass. Participants performed exercise protocols corresponding to their 5RM. Immediately after, unloaded CMJ and FV profile measurements were repeated.

Results: A significant decrease in CMJ height (∼5-6%) and in average power (∼4%) was recorded for both men and women. The FV profile did not change after the exercise protocol; however, there was a significant decrease in theoretical maximal power (from 4 to 5%) and in theoretical maximal velocity (∼3%). Maximal strength was not associated with the changes in FV profile.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that an acute high-load exercise decreased vertical jump performance and maximal power output, but without a concomitant change in FV profile. The large interindividual variability in FV measures indicates a less straightforward connection of the applied exercise with the acute response in the FV profile, highlighting the complexity of the FV profile to monitor changes in response to an acute training load.

对急性高负荷阻力训练的反应中,力-速度曲线变化的个体间差异很大。
背景:虽然高负荷阻力训练对肌肉发力能力的急性影响已得到广泛研究,但有关力-速度曲线(FV)关系的数据却很有限。有证据表明,根据运动方案的类型,垂直 FV 曲线对监测肌肉机械特性的变化具有很高的灵敏度。然而,对研究结果的解释似乎并不那么简单。因此,本研究旨在探讨高负荷阻力训练方案对负重跳跃时肌肉机械特性的影响,以及对与最大力量相关的垂直力-速度曲线(FV)的影响。方法:29 名阻力训练的男性运动员(平均年龄±SD:35.4 ± 7.8 岁)和 29 名女性运动员(平均年龄±SD:32.5 ± 7.0 岁)参加了研究。研究评估了背蹲五次重复最大负重(5RM)、无负荷反向运动跳(CMJ)和FV曲线。负重跳跃分别以体重的 25%、50%、75% 和 100%为基准进行。参与者进行了与其 5RM 相对应的锻炼。紧接着,重复测量无负荷 CMJ 和 FV 曲线:结果:男性和女性的 CMJ 高度(∼5-6%)和平均功率(∼4%)均有明显下降。运动方案后,FV 曲线没有发生变化;但是,理论最大力量(从 4% 降至 5%)和理论最大速度(∼3%)显著下降。最大力量与FV曲线的变化无关:研究结果表明,急性高负荷运动降低了纵跳成绩和最大功率输出,但没有同时改变FV曲线。FV测量的个体间差异很大,这表明所进行的运动与FV曲线的急性反应之间的联系并不那么直接,突出了FV曲线监测急性训练负荷反应变化的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiology international
Physiology international Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The journal provides a forum for important new research papers written by eminent scientists on experimental medical sciences. Papers reporting on both original work and review articles in the fields of basic and clinical physiology, pathophysiology (from the subcellular organization level up to the oranizmic one), as well as related disciplines, including history of physiological sciences, are accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信