Effects of an Auditory Versus Visual Stimulus on Reaction and Response Time During Countermovement Jumps.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Perceptual and Motor Skills Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1177/00315125241256688
Russell Lowell, David Saucier, Harish Chander, Reuben Burch, Zachary Gillen
{"title":"Effects of an Auditory Versus Visual Stimulus on Reaction and Response Time During Countermovement Jumps.","authors":"Russell Lowell, David Saucier, Harish Chander, Reuben Burch, Zachary Gillen","doi":"10.1177/00315125241256688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reacting and responding to an external stimulus is an important component of human performance, and they inform us about a participant's neurophysiological capabilities. Our purpose in this study was to determine whether reaction times (REACT), response times (RT), and countermovement jump (CMJ) performance differ when responding to an auditory (AUD) versus visual (VIS) stimulus. Participants were 17 college-aged volunteers (6 females and 11 males; <i>M</i> age = 23.0, <i>SD</i> = 3.4 years; <i>M</i> height = 174.57, <i>SD</i> = 10.37 cm; <i>M</i> body mass = 73.37, <i>SD</i> = 13.48 kg). Participants performed CMJs on force plates immediately upon receiving an AUD or a VIS stimulus. The AUD stimulus was a beep noise, while the VIS stimulus was a light on a screen in front of the participants. We determined REACT for the tibialis anterior (TA), medial gastrocnemius (GM), vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps femoris (BF) muscles to be the amount of time between stimulus onset and the initiation of the muscle's electromyographic (EMG) signal. We determined RT to be the amount of time between stimulus onset and the beginning of the participant's force production. We assessed CMJ performance via ground reaction forces during the unweighting, braking, and propulsive phases of the jump. We quantified EMG amplitude and frequency during each CMJ phase. We found RT to be faster to the AUD versus the VIS stimulus (<i>p</i> = .007). VL and BF muscles had faster REACT than TA and GM muscles (<i>p</i> ≤ .007). The AUD stimulus was associated with faster CMJ unweighting phase metrics (<i>p</i> ≤ .005). Thus, individuals may react and respond faster to an AUD versus VIS stimulus, with limited improvements in their subsequent physical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241256688","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reacting and responding to an external stimulus is an important component of human performance, and they inform us about a participant's neurophysiological capabilities. Our purpose in this study was to determine whether reaction times (REACT), response times (RT), and countermovement jump (CMJ) performance differ when responding to an auditory (AUD) versus visual (VIS) stimulus. Participants were 17 college-aged volunteers (6 females and 11 males; M age = 23.0, SD = 3.4 years; M height = 174.57, SD = 10.37 cm; M body mass = 73.37, SD = 13.48 kg). Participants performed CMJs on force plates immediately upon receiving an AUD or a VIS stimulus. The AUD stimulus was a beep noise, while the VIS stimulus was a light on a screen in front of the participants. We determined REACT for the tibialis anterior (TA), medial gastrocnemius (GM), vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps femoris (BF) muscles to be the amount of time between stimulus onset and the initiation of the muscle's electromyographic (EMG) signal. We determined RT to be the amount of time between stimulus onset and the beginning of the participant's force production. We assessed CMJ performance via ground reaction forces during the unweighting, braking, and propulsive phases of the jump. We quantified EMG amplitude and frequency during each CMJ phase. We found RT to be faster to the AUD versus the VIS stimulus (p = .007). VL and BF muscles had faster REACT than TA and GM muscles (p ≤ .007). The AUD stimulus was associated with faster CMJ unweighting phase metrics (p ≤ .005). Thus, individuals may react and respond faster to an AUD versus VIS stimulus, with limited improvements in their subsequent physical performance.

听觉刺激和视觉刺激对反向运动跳跃过程中反应和响应时间的影响
对外界刺激做出反应和回应是人类表现的重要组成部分,它们能让我们了解参与者的神经生理能力。本研究旨在确定在对听觉刺激(AUD)和视觉刺激(VIS)做出反应时,反应时间(REACT)、响应时间(RT)和反运动跳跃(CMJ)的表现是否存在差异。参与者为 17 名大学生志愿者(6 名女性和 11 名男性;平均年龄 = 23.0 岁,平均年龄 = 3.4 岁;平均身高 = 174.57 厘米,平均身高 = 10.37 厘米;平均体重 = 73.37 公斤,平均体重 = 13.48 公斤)。参与者在接受 AUD 或 VIS 刺激后立即在力板上进行 CMJ。AUD 刺激是蜂鸣声,而 VIS 刺激是参与者面前屏幕上的灯光。我们将胫骨前肌(TA)、内侧腓肠肌(GM)、阔筋膜外肌(VL)和股二头肌(BF)肌肉的 REACT 定义为从刺激开始到肌肉肌电图(EMG)信号启动之间的时间间隔。我们将 RT 定义为从刺激开始到受试者开始发力之间的时间间隔。我们通过跳跃过程中失重、制动和推进阶段的地面反作用力来评估 CMJ 性能。我们对每个 CMJ 阶段的肌电图振幅和频率进行了量化。我们发现,AUD 与 VIS 刺激相比,RT 更快(p = .007)。VL和BF肌肉的REACT快于TA和GM肌肉(p ≤ .007)。AUD 刺激与更快的 CMJ 失重阶段指标相关(p ≤ .005)。因此,相对于 VIS 刺激,个体对 AUD 的反应和响应可能更快,但对其随后的体能表现改善有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信