Efficacy of Medical Ozone for Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain with Abnormal Mitochondrial Redox State: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-05-01
Ayman Eldemrdash, Taha Tairy, Lilly Sabry, Ahmed Aelmulla, Maher Kamel, Engi Yousry
{"title":"Efficacy of Medical Ozone for Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain with Abnormal Mitochondrial Redox State: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ayman Eldemrdash, Taha Tairy, Lilly Sabry, Ahmed Aelmulla, Maher Kamel, Engi Yousry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain is multifaceted and 20% of the adult population lives with severe chronic pain and experience symptoms such as intense pain, depression, weakness, sleep problems, decreased quality of life and decreased emotional well-being.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This paper studies the efficacy of trigger point injections with ozone compared to standard steroid injection or combination therapy for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain in patients with abnormal mitochondrial redox state.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a prospective randomized clinical study conducted with 51 patients experiencing chronic musculoskeletal pain.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Medical Research Institute Hospital, Alexandria University.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By computer-generated random numbers the 51 patients were divided into 3 groups. Group A (17 patients) received ozone injection, group B (17 patients) received betamethasone injection and group C (17 patients) received combined ozone and betamethasone injections. The groups were compared based on the intensity of pain and correction of mitochondrial redox state of the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three days after intervention, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores reported by patients were lower in group A compared to group B (with a mean difference 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.15-2.39 (P < 0.02). One and 3 weeks after intervention, VAS scores of patients were lower in groups A and C compared to group B. At one week the mean difference between A and B was 1.2, with a 95% CI of 0.15-2.25 (P < 0.02) and the mean difference between C and B was 1.73 with a 95% CI of 0.69-2.78 (P < 0.001). At 3 weeks the mean difference between A and B was 1.5 with a 95% CI of 0.2-2.87 (P < 0.01) and the mean difference between C and B was 2.27 with a 95% CI of 0.93-3.60 (P < 0.0001). The reduced/oxidized glutathione ratio after intervention was higher in groups A and C compared to group B (P > 0.008). The mitochondrial copy number was higher in group A compared to group B (P < 0.002).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>This study didn't allow for the comparison of the experimental groups with a placebo or control group for musculoskeletal pain conditions in orderto establish the role of an abnormal mitochondrial redox state on the pathogenesis of patients from an ethical view.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ozone therapy or combined ozone and betamethasone treatment are  effective techniques for management of pain since it produced a significant reduction of muscle pain and increase of the pain free interval experienced by patients. Ozone therapy causes pain improvement which increases with time and it improves muscle oxygenation and mitochondrial function.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical Research Institute (IORH: IOR 00088812) and was registered at the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (www.pactr.org) under the identification number PACTR201908620943471. The registration this experiment started on 07/08/2019. This study's protocol followed the CONSORT guidelines and was performed under the relevant guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain is multifaceted and 20% of the adult population lives with severe chronic pain and experience symptoms such as intense pain, depression, weakness, sleep problems, decreased quality of life and decreased emotional well-being.

Objectives: This paper studies the efficacy of trigger point injections with ozone compared to standard steroid injection or combination therapy for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain in patients with abnormal mitochondrial redox state.

Study design: This is a prospective randomized clinical study conducted with 51 patients experiencing chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Setting: Medical Research Institute Hospital, Alexandria University.

Methods: By computer-generated random numbers the 51 patients were divided into 3 groups. Group A (17 patients) received ozone injection, group B (17 patients) received betamethasone injection and group C (17 patients) received combined ozone and betamethasone injections. The groups were compared based on the intensity of pain and correction of mitochondrial redox state of the patients.

Results: Three days after intervention, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores reported by patients were lower in group A compared to group B (with a mean difference 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.15-2.39 (P < 0.02). One and 3 weeks after intervention, VAS scores of patients were lower in groups A and C compared to group B. At one week the mean difference between A and B was 1.2, with a 95% CI of 0.15-2.25 (P < 0.02) and the mean difference between C and B was 1.73 with a 95% CI of 0.69-2.78 (P < 0.001). At 3 weeks the mean difference between A and B was 1.5 with a 95% CI of 0.2-2.87 (P < 0.01) and the mean difference between C and B was 2.27 with a 95% CI of 0.93-3.60 (P < 0.0001). The reduced/oxidized glutathione ratio after intervention was higher in groups A and C compared to group B (P > 0.008). The mitochondrial copy number was higher in group A compared to group B (P < 0.002).

Limitation: This study didn't allow for the comparison of the experimental groups with a placebo or control group for musculoskeletal pain conditions in orderto establish the role of an abnormal mitochondrial redox state on the pathogenesis of patients from an ethical view.

Conclusions: Ozone therapy or combined ozone and betamethasone treatment are  effective techniques for management of pain since it produced a significant reduction of muscle pain and increase of the pain free interval experienced by patients. Ozone therapy causes pain improvement which increases with time and it improves muscle oxygenation and mitochondrial function.

Trial registration: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical Research Institute (IORH: IOR 00088812) and was registered at the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (www.pactr.org) under the identification number PACTR201908620943471. The registration this experiment started on 07/08/2019. This study's protocol followed the CONSORT guidelines and was performed under the relevant guidelines.

医用臭氧治疗线粒体氧化还原状态异常的慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的疗效:前瞻性随机临床试验。
背景:慢性原发性肌肉骨骼疼痛是多方面的,20%的成年人患有严重的慢性疼痛,并伴有剧烈疼痛、抑郁、虚弱、睡眠问题、生活质量下降和情绪低落等症状:本文研究了在治疗线粒体氧化还原状态异常患者的慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛时,臭氧触发点注射与标准类固醇注射或综合疗法的疗效比较:这是一项前瞻性随机临床研究,研究对象为51名慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者:亚历山大大学医学研究所医院:通过计算机生成的随机数字将 51 名患者分为 3 组。A 组(17 名患者)接受臭氧注射,B 组(17 名患者)接受倍他米松注射,C 组(17 名患者)接受臭氧和倍他米松联合注射。根据患者的疼痛强度和线粒体氧化还原状态的纠正情况对各组进行比较:干预三天后,A 组患者的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分低于 B 组(平均差异为 1.27,95% 置信区间(CI)为 0.15-2.39(P < 0.02))。干预后一周和三周,A 组和 C 组患者的 VAS 评分低于 B 组。一周后,A 组和 B 组的平均差异为 1.2,95% 置信区间为 0.15-2.25 (P < 0.02);C 组和 B 组的平均差异为 1.73,95% 置信区间为 0.69-2.78 (P < 0.001)。3 周后,A 和 B 之间的平均差异为 1.5,95% CI 为 0.2-2.87(P < 0.01);C 和 B 之间的平均差异为 2.27,95% CI 为 0.93-3.60(P < 0.0001)。与 B 组相比,A 组和 C 组干预后的还原/氧化谷胱甘肽比率更高(P > 0.008)。与 B 组相比,A 组的线粒体拷贝数更高(P < 0.002):本研究无法将实验组与安慰剂组或肌肉骨骼疼痛对照组进行比较,因此无法从伦理角度确定线粒体氧化还原状态异常对患者发病机制的影响:结论:臭氧疗法或臭氧与倍他米松联合疗法是治疗疼痛的有效技术,因为它能显著减轻肌肉疼痛,延长患者的无痛间隔时间。臭氧疗法能改善疼痛,并随着时间的推移而增加,还能改善肌肉氧合和线粒体功能:本研究获得了医学研究所伦理委员会(IORH:IOR 00088812)的批准,并在泛非临床试验注册中心(www.pactr.org)进行了注册,注册号为 PACTR201908620943471。本实验的注册始于 2019 年 8 月 7 日。本研究方案遵循 CONSORT 指南,并在相关指南的指导下进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信