Considering context: Current relationship satisfaction in a second-generation model of men's physical intimate partner violence.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1111/famp.13010
Amy M Smith Slep, Richard E Heyman, Kelly A Daly, Katherine J W Baucom
{"title":"Considering context: Current relationship satisfaction in a second-generation model of men's physical intimate partner violence.","authors":"Amy M Smith Slep, Richard E Heyman, Kelly A Daly, Katherine J W Baucom","doi":"10.1111/famp.13010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite a half-century of scholarship devoted to explicating and disrupting the intergenerational transmission of family violence, it remains a prominent and destructive social force in the United States. Theoretical models have posited a variety of historical and concurrent risk and protective factors implicated in the trajectory from childhood violence exposure to adult perpetration. Using a second-generation model of intimate partner violence (IPV), we integrated social learning and attachment conceptualizations to examine pathways from family-of-origin violence to IPV perpetration among adult men. A sample of mixed-sex couples (N = 233) completed self-report measures related to social learning and attachment-based factors (e.g., violence in past relationships, child exposure, IPV attitudes, adult attachment) and participated in a 10-min conversation about a desired area for change in their relationship. Following, each partner participated in a video-mediated-recall procedure assessing their anger volatility and eliciting attributions of their partners' behavior. We tested mediation pathways (consistent with social learning and attachment theories) between violence in men's families of origin and their adult IPV perpetration as a function of relationship satisfaction. The proposed model fit the data well (CFI = 0.95) but had notable modifications from the hypothesized model. Generally, social-learning pathways were more consistent with the data. Relationship satisfaction interacted with some parameters. Results support theoretical advances in understanding IPV. Although exposure to violence in men's family of origin confers risk for later IPV, and a social learning developmental pathway is consistent with results, some of these effects are altered by relationship context.</p>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.13010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite a half-century of scholarship devoted to explicating and disrupting the intergenerational transmission of family violence, it remains a prominent and destructive social force in the United States. Theoretical models have posited a variety of historical and concurrent risk and protective factors implicated in the trajectory from childhood violence exposure to adult perpetration. Using a second-generation model of intimate partner violence (IPV), we integrated social learning and attachment conceptualizations to examine pathways from family-of-origin violence to IPV perpetration among adult men. A sample of mixed-sex couples (N = 233) completed self-report measures related to social learning and attachment-based factors (e.g., violence in past relationships, child exposure, IPV attitudes, adult attachment) and participated in a 10-min conversation about a desired area for change in their relationship. Following, each partner participated in a video-mediated-recall procedure assessing their anger volatility and eliciting attributions of their partners' behavior. We tested mediation pathways (consistent with social learning and attachment theories) between violence in men's families of origin and their adult IPV perpetration as a function of relationship satisfaction. The proposed model fit the data well (CFI = 0.95) but had notable modifications from the hypothesized model. Generally, social-learning pathways were more consistent with the data. Relationship satisfaction interacted with some parameters. Results support theoretical advances in understanding IPV. Although exposure to violence in men's family of origin confers risk for later IPV, and a social learning developmental pathway is consistent with results, some of these effects are altered by relationship context.

考虑背景:第二代男性亲密伴侣身体暴力模型中的当前关系满意度。
尽管有半个世纪的学术研究致力于解释和阻断家庭暴力的代际传播,但在美国,家庭暴力仍然是一种突出的破坏性社会力量。理论模型提出了各种历史和并发的风险和保护因素,这些因素与童年时期遭受暴力到成年后实施暴力的轨迹有关。利用亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的第二代模型,我们整合了社会学习和依恋概念,研究了成年男性从原生家庭暴力事件到 IPV 施暴的路径。一组男女混合伴侣样本(N = 233)完成了与社会学习和依恋因素(如过去关系中的暴力、儿童接触、对 IPV 的态度、成人依恋)相关的自我报告测量,并参加了 10 分钟的对话,讨论了他们关系中希望改变的方面。之后,每对伴侣都参加了一个以视频为媒介的回忆程序,评估他们的愤怒波动性,并引出对伴侣行为的归因。我们测试了男性原生家庭中的暴力与其成年后的 IPV 行为之间的中介路径(与社会学习和依恋理论一致),并将其作为关系满意度的函数。提出的模型与数据拟合良好(CFI = 0.95),但与假设的模型相比有明显的偏差。一般来说,社会学习路径与数据更加一致。关系满意度与某些参数存在交互作用。研究结果支持在理解 IPV 方面取得的理论进展。虽然男性在原生家庭中遭受暴力会导致其日后遭受 IPV 的风险,而且社会学习发展路径与结果一致,但其中一些影响会因关系背景而改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信