Consumer preferences for foods with varying best if used-by dates: An experimental auction and sensory evaluation analysis

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Billie Ray , Karen L. DeLong , Kimberly Jensen , Sara Burns , Curtis Luckett
{"title":"Consumer preferences for foods with varying best if used-by dates: An experimental auction and sensory evaluation analysis","authors":"Billie Ray ,&nbsp;Karen L. DeLong ,&nbsp;Kimberly Jensen ,&nbsp;Sara Burns ,&nbsp;Curtis Luckett","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food waste is a significant problem in the United States with over 133 billion pounds of food wasted every year. Best-if-used-by dates (BUBDs) are a cue consumers use in evaluating foods and deciding when to dispose of them. Many consumers believe BUBDs are an expiration indicator; instead, they represent a food’s peak quality, and foods are typically safe to consume beyond their BUBDs. A non-hypothetical experimental auction with 193 participants was utilized to determine how food sensory ratings and BUBD knowledge affects consumer willingness to pay (WTP) and anticipated food waste for foods with varying BUBDs. Through three rounds, consumers evaluated the appearance and taste of salads and deli meat with varying BUBDs, and then stated their maximum WTP for the foods and the percentage of the foods they would waste. Tobit and Cragg double hurdle model results indicate BUBDs and sensory ratings were significant in determining WTP and anticipated waste. As consumers rated the taste and appearance of salads and deli meat higher, they stated they would pay more for, and consume more of, the foods. Sensory evaluations were a stronger predictor of WTP and expected waste than BUBDs in certain scenarios. Implications of this research indicate food waste could be reduced if consumers utilize food sensory evaluations prior to disposing of foods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 102650"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000617","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food waste is a significant problem in the United States with over 133 billion pounds of food wasted every year. Best-if-used-by dates (BUBDs) are a cue consumers use in evaluating foods and deciding when to dispose of them. Many consumers believe BUBDs are an expiration indicator; instead, they represent a food’s peak quality, and foods are typically safe to consume beyond their BUBDs. A non-hypothetical experimental auction with 193 participants was utilized to determine how food sensory ratings and BUBD knowledge affects consumer willingness to pay (WTP) and anticipated food waste for foods with varying BUBDs. Through three rounds, consumers evaluated the appearance and taste of salads and deli meat with varying BUBDs, and then stated their maximum WTP for the foods and the percentage of the foods they would waste. Tobit and Cragg double hurdle model results indicate BUBDs and sensory ratings were significant in determining WTP and anticipated waste. As consumers rated the taste and appearance of salads and deli meat higher, they stated they would pay more for, and consume more of, the foods. Sensory evaluations were a stronger predictor of WTP and expected waste than BUBDs in certain scenarios. Implications of this research indicate food waste could be reduced if consumers utilize food sensory evaluations prior to disposing of foods.

消费者对不同最佳食用期食品的偏好:实验拍卖和感官评估分析
在美国,食物浪费是一个严重问题,每年浪费的食物超过 1330 亿磅。最佳食用日期(BUBDs)是消费者在评估食品和决定何时处理食品时使用的一种提示。许多消费者认为最佳食用期限是一个过期指标,但实际上,最佳食用期限代表了食品的最高质量,超过最佳食用期限的食品通常是可以安全食用的。我们采用了一个有 193 名参与者参加的非假定性实验拍卖,以确定食品感官评级和对保质期的了解如何影响消费者对不同保质期食品的支付意愿(WTP)和预期的食物浪费。通过三轮竞价,消费者对不同生物多样性指数的沙拉和熟食肉类的外观和味道进行了评价,然后说出了他们对这些食品的最高支付意愿以及他们会浪费的食品比例。Tobit 和 Cragg 双障碍模型的结果表明,BUBDs 和感官评分在决定 WTP 和预期浪费方面具有重要意义。由于消费者对沙拉和熟食肉类的口味和外观评价较高,他们表示会为这些食品支付更多的钱,消费更多的食品。在某些情况下,感官评价比生物多样性指数更能预测消费者的购买意愿和预期浪费。这项研究的启示是,如果消费者在处理食品之前利用食品感官评价,就可以减少食品浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信