Multidimensional profiles of head start preschoolers' moral self-concept predict subsequent, but not concurrent, aggression.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Development and Psychopathology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1017/S0954579424000993
Jamie Gahtan, Erin Ruth Baker, Rong Huang, Sumaita Binta Salim, Sojung Park
{"title":"Multidimensional profiles of head start preschoolers' moral self-concept predict subsequent, but not concurrent, aggression.","authors":"Jamie Gahtan, Erin Ruth Baker, Rong Huang, Sumaita Binta Salim, Sojung Park","doi":"10.1017/S0954579424000993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The moral self-concept (MSC) describes how children view themselves as moral agents. Research suggests that the MSC may relate to moral behavior, yet little is known about how MSC relates to moral behavior in preschoolers. One hundred six low-income children (<i>M</i> <sub><i>age</i></sub> = 52.78 months, <i>SD</i> = 6.61 months) and their teachers participated in this study. In the fall, children completed a MSC puppet task measure. In the fall and spring, teachers reported via children's survey prosocial behavior and aggressive behavior. We used a person-centered approach to identify profiles of MSC, which revealed two profiles of behavior: c<i>omforting prosocials</i> and h<i>elpful aggressors.</i> Comforting prosocials showed a moderate preference for comforting, a slight preference for helping, and a slight preference for avoiding aggression. Helpful aggressors had a moderate aversion to comforting, a strong preference for helping, and a slight preference for aggressive behavior. Subsequent analysis of covariance analysis revealed that MSC profiles did not differ in concurrent behavior but did differ in behavior 6 months later. The comforting prosocial group participated in more aggression than the helpful aggressors. Additionally, analysis of covariance analysis of change in aggression scores over time showed that comforting prosocials aggression increased, while helpful aggressors aggression decreased. Both groups over time decreased in prosocial behavior, but to different degrees. Overall, findings reveal that the MSC in preschoolers may relate to future not concurrent moral behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":11265,"journal":{"name":"Development and Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1153-1164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The moral self-concept (MSC) describes how children view themselves as moral agents. Research suggests that the MSC may relate to moral behavior, yet little is known about how MSC relates to moral behavior in preschoolers. One hundred six low-income children (M age = 52.78 months, SD = 6.61 months) and their teachers participated in this study. In the fall, children completed a MSC puppet task measure. In the fall and spring, teachers reported via children's survey prosocial behavior and aggressive behavior. We used a person-centered approach to identify profiles of MSC, which revealed two profiles of behavior: comforting prosocials and helpful aggressors. Comforting prosocials showed a moderate preference for comforting, a slight preference for helping, and a slight preference for avoiding aggression. Helpful aggressors had a moderate aversion to comforting, a strong preference for helping, and a slight preference for aggressive behavior. Subsequent analysis of covariance analysis revealed that MSC profiles did not differ in concurrent behavior but did differ in behavior 6 months later. The comforting prosocial group participated in more aggression than the helpful aggressors. Additionally, analysis of covariance analysis of change in aggression scores over time showed that comforting prosocials aggression increased, while helpful aggressors aggression decreased. Both groups over time decreased in prosocial behavior, but to different degrees. Overall, findings reveal that the MSC in preschoolers may relate to future not concurrent moral behavior.

学龄前儿童道德自我概念的多维特征可预测其随后的攻击行为,但不能预测同时发生的攻击行为。
道德自我概念(MSC)描述了儿童如何将自己视为道德主体。研究表明,道德自我概念可能与道德行为有关,但人们对道德自我概念与学龄前儿童道德行为的关系知之甚少。166 名低收入儿童(中位年龄 = 52.78 个月,最小年龄 = 6.61 个月)和他们的老师参加了本研究。在秋季,儿童完成了一项 MSC 木偶任务测量。在秋季和春季,教师通过儿童的调查表报告其亲社会行为和攻击行为。我们采用了以人为本的方法来识别地中海贫血症的特征,结果发现了两种行为特征:安慰性亲社会行为和帮助性攻击行为。安慰型的亲社会者表现出适度的安慰偏好、轻微的帮助偏好和轻微的避免攻击偏好。乐于助人的攻击者对安慰有适度的反感,对帮助有强烈的偏好,对攻击行为有轻微的偏好。随后的协方差分析表明,MSC 特征在同期行为上没有差异,但在 6 个月后的行为上有差异。安慰性亲社会组比乐于助人的攻击者参与了更多的攻击行为。此外,对攻击行为得分随时间变化的协方差分析表明,安慰性亲社会者的攻击行为增加了,而乐于助人的攻击行为减少了。随着时间的推移,两组人的亲社会行为都有所减少,但程度不同。总之,研究结果表明,学龄前儿童的间充质干细胞可能与未来而非同时发生的道德行为有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development and Psychopathology
Development and Psychopathology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
319
期刊介绍: This multidisciplinary journal is devoted to the publication of original, empirical, theoretical and review papers which address the interrelationship of normal and pathological development in adults and children. It is intended to serve and integrate the field of developmental psychopathology which strives to understand patterns of adaptation and maladaptation throughout the lifespan. This journal is of interest to psychologists, psychiatrists, social scientists, neuroscientists, paediatricians, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信