Layperson knowledge on naloxone and medications for opioid use disorder in an urban population: a cross sectional survey study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Christine Ramdin, Malgorzata Zembrzuska, Krzysztof Zembrzuski, Lewis Nelson
{"title":"Layperson knowledge on naloxone and medications for opioid use disorder in an urban population: a cross sectional survey study.","authors":"Christine Ramdin, Malgorzata Zembrzuska, Krzysztof Zembrzuski, Lewis Nelson","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2024.2353431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>There has been little research in an urban population regarding knowledge of harm reduction measures and treatment options. The objective of our study was to evaluate knowledge and perceptions of harm reduction measures and types of treatment available for opioid use disorder among patients and family in an urban emergency department (ED) waiting room.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single center, cross-sectional survey study that occurred between September 2021 and August 2022. A convenience sample of patients and family members that were above 18 and English speaking were recruited by research assistants. Participants were assessed on knowledge and preferences around drug treatment options and harm reduction. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using the Freeman-Halton/Kruskall-Wallis/Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests. <i>p</i>-Values were reported at the 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 200 responses. Of these, 104 people had a connection to someone with a substance use disorder (SUD) and 50 had an SUD. Of those who had a connection to someone with SUD, 63 had heard of naloxone (60.6%, CI: [50.5, 69.9]). Fewer than 60% of respondents in each group had heard of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) (<i>p</i> = 0.46) and fewer than 50% thought that among people who use drugs that they knew would be interested in receiving treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.10).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Our study found that among people who came to an urban emergency department, there was a lack of awareness of harm reduction and MOUD. Interventions should be put into place to educate on the importance of MOUD and harm reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2024.2353431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: There has been little research in an urban population regarding knowledge of harm reduction measures and treatment options. The objective of our study was to evaluate knowledge and perceptions of harm reduction measures and types of treatment available for opioid use disorder among patients and family in an urban emergency department (ED) waiting room.

Methods: We conducted a single center, cross-sectional survey study that occurred between September 2021 and August 2022. A convenience sample of patients and family members that were above 18 and English speaking were recruited by research assistants. Participants were assessed on knowledge and preferences around drug treatment options and harm reduction. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using the Freeman-Halton/Kruskall-Wallis/Mann-Whitney U tests. p-Values were reported at the 0.05 significance level.

Results: We collected 200 responses. Of these, 104 people had a connection to someone with a substance use disorder (SUD) and 50 had an SUD. Of those who had a connection to someone with SUD, 63 had heard of naloxone (60.6%, CI: [50.5, 69.9]). Fewer than 60% of respondents in each group had heard of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) (p = 0.46) and fewer than 50% thought that among people who use drugs that they knew would be interested in receiving treatment (p = 0.10).

Discussion and conclusions: Our study found that among people who came to an urban emergency department, there was a lack of awareness of harm reduction and MOUD. Interventions should be put into place to educate on the importance of MOUD and harm reduction.

城市居民对纳洛酮和阿片类药物使用障碍药物的非专业知识:一项横断面调查研究。
背景和目的:有关城市人群对减低伤害措施和治疗方案的了解的研究很少。我们的研究旨在评估城市急诊科(ED)候诊室的患者和家属对减低伤害措施和阿片类药物使用障碍的治疗类型的了解和看法:我们在 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 8 月期间开展了一项单中心横断面调查研究。研究助理对 18 岁以上、会讲英语的患者和家属进行了方便抽样调查。研究人员评估了参与者对药物治疗方案和减低伤害的了解程度和偏好。数据使用描述性统计进行总结,并使用Freeman-Halton/Kruskall-Wallis/Mann-Whitney U检验进行比较:我们收集了 200 份回复。其中 104 人与药物使用障碍 (SUD) 患者有联系,50 人患有 SUD。在与 SUD 患者有联系的人中,63 人听说过纳洛酮(60.6%,CI:[50.5, 69.9])。每组中只有不到 60% 的受访者听说过阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗(MOUD)(P = 0.46),不到 50% 的受访者认为他们认识的吸毒者会有兴趣接受治疗(P = 0.10):我们的研究发现,在城市急诊科就诊的人群中,缺乏对减低伤害和MOUD的认识。应采取干预措施,宣传 "MOUD "和减低伤害的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信