Mapping the Landscape of Postsecondary Transition Experimental Research: A 10-Year Review of CDTEI

IF 1.6 3区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1177/21651434241247772

Wendy R. Mitchell, Courtney A. Tennell, Corey Peltier, Kendra L. Williams-Diehm

{"title":"Mapping the Landscape of Postsecondary Transition Experimental Research: A 10-Year Review of CDTEI","authors":"Wendy R. Mitchell, Courtney A. Tennell, Corey Peltier, Kendra L. Williams-Diehm","doi":"10.1177/21651434241247772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the experimental intervention research being published from 2010 to 2020 within Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals (CDTEI). We critically evaluated studies found through a hand-search of CDTEI and identified patterns and trends across ten years based on study characteristics, focus of the experimental literature, and adherence to reporting standards set by the National Technical Assistance Center (NTACT) through their quality indicators. A total of 208 articles were reviewed following The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as a framework. Approximately 17% (n=36) of documents used an experimental design that fit inclusion criteria. Of these, 47% were group design and 53% used a single case design. Results suggest a need to shift away from efficacy research to effectiveness-based research with a focus on real-life academic settings and natural change agents. Findings suggest a critical need for the educational research community to enhance the trustworthiness of scientific findings with convincing data analysis methods that are reliable and valid for the conclusions drawn.","PeriodicalId":47075,"journal":{"name":"Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434241247772","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the experimental intervention research being published from 2010 to 2020 within Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals (CDTEI). We critically evaluated studies found through a hand-search of CDTEI and identified patterns and trends across ten years based on study characteristics, focus of the experimental literature, and adherence to reporting standards set by the National Technical Assistance Center (NTACT) through their quality indicators. A total of 208 articles were reviewed following The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as a framework. Approximately 17% (n=36) of documents used an experimental design that fit inclusion criteria. Of these, 47% were group design and 53% used a single case design. Results suggest a need to shift away from efficacy research to effectiveness-based research with a focus on real-life academic settings and natural change agents. Findings suggest a critical need for the educational research community to enhance the trustworthiness of scientific findings with convincing data analysis methods that are reliable and valid for the conclusions drawn.

查看原文本刊更多论文

绘制中学后过渡时期实验研究图：CDTEI 十年回顾

本系统性文献综述全面评估了 2010 年至 2020 年间在 "特殊人士职业发展与过渡"（Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals，CDTEI）范围内发表的实验干预研究。我们对通过手工搜索 CDTEI 发现的研究进行了严格评估，并根据研究特点、实验文献的重点以及对国家技术援助中心（NTACT）通过其质量指标设定的报告标准的遵守情况，确定了十年间的模式和趋势。以《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》（PRISMA）指南为框架，共审查了 208 篇文章。约有 17% 的文献（n=36）采用了符合纳入标准的实验设计。其中，47% 采用分组设计，53% 采用单例设计。研究结果表明，有必要从功效研究转向基于效果的研究，重点关注现实生活中的学术环境和自然变化因素。研究结果表明，教育研究界亟需采用可靠、有效的数据分析方法来提高科学研究结果的可信度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals Multiple-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

15.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals specializes in the fields of secondary education, transition, and career development for persons with documented disabilities and special needs. CDTEI focuses on the life roles of individuals as students, workers, consumers, family members, and citizens. Articles cover qualitative and quantitative research, scholarly reviews, and program descriptions and evaluations. Published by the Hammill Institute on Disabilities and SAGE in association with the Division on Career Development and Transition of The Council for Exceptional Children.