Decision-making under risk and its correlates in schizophrenia

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Xiaoyu Dong , Bridget Shovestul , Abhishek Saxena , Emily Dudek , Stephanie Reda , J. Steven Lamberti , David Dodell-Feder
{"title":"Decision-making under risk and its correlates in schizophrenia","authors":"Xiaoyu Dong ,&nbsp;Bridget Shovestul ,&nbsp;Abhishek Saxena ,&nbsp;Emily Dudek ,&nbsp;Stephanie Reda ,&nbsp;J. Steven Lamberti ,&nbsp;David Dodell-Feder","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2024.100314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) are associated with pervasive cognitive impairments, including deficits in decision-making under risk. However, there is inconclusive evidence regarding specific mechanisms underlying altered decision-making patterns. In this study, participants (33 SSD and 28 non-SSD) completed the Columbia Card Task, an explicit risk-taking task, to better understand risk preference and adjustment in dynamic decision-making. We found that while there is no group difference in overall risk-taking, risk preference, or optimal decision-making, risk adjustment to contextual factors (e.g., loss probability) is blunted in SSD. We also found associations between risk-taking/suboptimal decision-making and disorganized symptoms, excited symptoms, and role functioning, but no associations between decision-making and working memory. These results suggest that during a complex, dynamic risk-taking task, individuals with SSD exhibit less adaption to changing information about risk, which may reflect risk imperception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001324000155/pdfft?md5=43747da0409467127db61b6f8313dc18&pid=1-s2.0-S2215001324000155-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001324000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) are associated with pervasive cognitive impairments, including deficits in decision-making under risk. However, there is inconclusive evidence regarding specific mechanisms underlying altered decision-making patterns. In this study, participants (33 SSD and 28 non-SSD) completed the Columbia Card Task, an explicit risk-taking task, to better understand risk preference and adjustment in dynamic decision-making. We found that while there is no group difference in overall risk-taking, risk preference, or optimal decision-making, risk adjustment to contextual factors (e.g., loss probability) is blunted in SSD. We also found associations between risk-taking/suboptimal decision-making and disorganized symptoms, excited symptoms, and role functioning, but no associations between decision-making and working memory. These results suggest that during a complex, dynamic risk-taking task, individuals with SSD exhibit less adaption to changing information about risk, which may reflect risk imperception.

精神分裂症患者的风险决策及其相关因素
精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)与普遍的认知障碍有关,包括风险决策的缺陷。然而,关于决策模式改变的具体机制尚无定论。在这项研究中,参与者(33 名 SSD 患者和 28 名非 SSD 患者)完成了一项明确的风险承担任务--哥伦比亚卡任务,以更好地了解动态决策中的风险偏好和调整。我们发现,虽然在总体风险承担、风险偏好或最优决策方面不存在群体差异,但 SSD 对环境因素(如损失概率)的风险调整能力却很弱。我们还发现,冒险/次优决策与混乱症状、兴奋症状和角色功能之间存在关联,但决策与工作记忆之间没有关联。这些结果表明,在复杂、动态的风险承担任务中,SSD 患者对不断变化的风险信息的适应能力较弱,这可能反映了他们对风险的不感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信