A review of published studies on virtual reality in sexuality research.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
João Miguel Marques, Caio Petrus Monteiro Figueiredo, Marco D T Scanavino
{"title":"A review of published studies on virtual reality in sexuality research.","authors":"João Miguel Marques, Caio Petrus Monteiro Figueiredo, Marco D T Scanavino","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qeae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Virtual reality (VR) technology contributes to greater approach of methodological safety to make ecological validity more feasible and a growing interest in sexuality behaviors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to show VR in the sexuality area by a comprehensive review of outcomes, offer a synthesis of the studies, and make a methodological quality assessment of finding results. A secondary goal was to investigate the effect of immersion on diverse sexual responses outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a review based on a systematic review strategy describing types of studies, participants, data collection and outcomes; searched in 4 electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and SciELO), and made a full-text screening process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found 18 articles that met research criteria synthesized within 3 outcome groups: erection measures, level of immersion, and biomarker studies. Synthesis shows a lack of methodological aspects that impair results, such as description of methods from bias protection, randomization, or concealment. The literature still needs to improve its methodology, even though it already shows relevant data for intervention in sexual dysfunction, forensic psychiatry, sexual attraction, orientation, and use of pornography.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current methodological issues need better design to highlight relevant issues in sexuality with stronger quality of design, opening boundaries to new diagnostic or interventional technologies to sexual health.</p>","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":" ","pages":"371-386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Virtual reality (VR) technology contributes to greater approach of methodological safety to make ecological validity more feasible and a growing interest in sexuality behaviors.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to show VR in the sexuality area by a comprehensive review of outcomes, offer a synthesis of the studies, and make a methodological quality assessment of finding results. A secondary goal was to investigate the effect of immersion on diverse sexual responses outcomes.

Methods: We designed a review based on a systematic review strategy describing types of studies, participants, data collection and outcomes; searched in 4 electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and SciELO), and made a full-text screening process.

Results: The study found 18 articles that met research criteria synthesized within 3 outcome groups: erection measures, level of immersion, and biomarker studies. Synthesis shows a lack of methodological aspects that impair results, such as description of methods from bias protection, randomization, or concealment. The literature still needs to improve its methodology, even though it already shows relevant data for intervention in sexual dysfunction, forensic psychiatry, sexual attraction, orientation, and use of pornography.

Conclusion: Current methodological issues need better design to highlight relevant issues in sexuality with stronger quality of design, opening boundaries to new diagnostic or interventional technologies to sexual health.

对已发表的有关虚拟现实在性学研究中的应用的研究综述。
导言:虚拟现实(VR)技术有助于提高方法论的安全性,使生态有效性更加可行,人们对性行为的兴趣也日益浓厚:虚拟现实(VR)技术有助于提高方法论的安全性,使生态有效性更加可行,人们对性行为的兴趣也与日俱增:本研究的目的是通过对结果的全面回顾来展示虚拟现实技术在性行为领域的应用,提供研究综述,并对发现的结果进行方法学质量评估。次要目标是研究沉浸式体验对不同性反应结果的影响:我们根据描述研究类型、参与者、数据收集和结果的系统性综述策略设计了一篇综述;在 4 个电子数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 SciELO)中进行了检索,并进行了全文筛选:研究发现了 18 篇符合研究标准的文章,并在 3 个结果组中进行了综合:勃起测量、浸入程度和生物标志物研究。综合结果表明,缺乏有损研究结果的方法论方面的内容,如对偏倚保护、随机化或隐藏等方法的描述。尽管文献已经显示了性功能障碍、法医精神病学、性吸引、性取向和色情制品使用干预的相关数据,但其方法仍需改进:当前的方法学问题需要更好的设计,以更高的设计质量突出性方面的相关问题,为性健康的新诊断或干预技术开辟道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual medicine reviews
Sexual medicine reviews UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信