Reactivities of acrylamide warheads toward cysteine targets: a QM/ML approach to covalent inhibitor design

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Aaron D. Danilack, Callum J. Dickson, Cihan Soylu, Mike Fortunato, Stephane Rodde, Hagen Munkler, Viktor Hornak, Jose S. Duca
{"title":"Reactivities of acrylamide warheads toward cysteine targets: a QM/ML approach to covalent inhibitor design","authors":"Aaron D. Danilack,&nbsp;Callum J. Dickson,&nbsp;Cihan Soylu,&nbsp;Mike Fortunato,&nbsp;Stephane Rodde,&nbsp;Hagen Munkler,&nbsp;Viktor Hornak,&nbsp;Jose S. Duca","doi":"10.1007/s10822-024-00560-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Covalent inhibition offers many advantages over non-covalent inhibition, but covalent warhead reactivity must be carefully balanced to maintain potency while avoiding unwanted side effects. While warhead reactivities are commonly measured with assays, a computational model to predict warhead reactivities could be useful for several aspects of the covalent inhibitor design process. Studies have shown correlations between covalent warhead reactivities and quantum mechanic (QM) properties that describe important aspects of the covalent reaction mechanism. However, the models from these studies are often linear regression equations and can have limitations associated with their usage. Applications of machine learning (ML) models to predict covalent warhead reactivities with QM descriptors are not extensively seen in the literature. This study uses QM descriptors, calculated at different levels of theory, to train ML models to predict reactivities of covalent acrylamide warheads. The QM/ML models are compared with linear regression models built upon the same QM descriptors and with ML models trained on structure-based features like Morgan fingerprints and RDKit descriptors. Experiments show that the QM/ML models outperform the linear regression models and the structure-based ML models, and literature test sets demonstrate the power of the QM/ML models to predict reactivities of unseen acrylamide warhead scaffolds. Ultimately, these QM/ML models are effective, computationally feasible tools that can expedite the design of new covalent inhibitors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10822-024-00560-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Covalent inhibition offers many advantages over non-covalent inhibition, but covalent warhead reactivity must be carefully balanced to maintain potency while avoiding unwanted side effects. While warhead reactivities are commonly measured with assays, a computational model to predict warhead reactivities could be useful for several aspects of the covalent inhibitor design process. Studies have shown correlations between covalent warhead reactivities and quantum mechanic (QM) properties that describe important aspects of the covalent reaction mechanism. However, the models from these studies are often linear regression equations and can have limitations associated with their usage. Applications of machine learning (ML) models to predict covalent warhead reactivities with QM descriptors are not extensively seen in the literature. This study uses QM descriptors, calculated at different levels of theory, to train ML models to predict reactivities of covalent acrylamide warheads. The QM/ML models are compared with linear regression models built upon the same QM descriptors and with ML models trained on structure-based features like Morgan fingerprints and RDKit descriptors. Experiments show that the QM/ML models outperform the linear regression models and the structure-based ML models, and literature test sets demonstrate the power of the QM/ML models to predict reactivities of unseen acrylamide warhead scaffolds. Ultimately, these QM/ML models are effective, computationally feasible tools that can expedite the design of new covalent inhibitors.

Abstract Image

丙烯酰胺弹头对半胱氨酸目标的反应活性:共价抑制剂设计的 QM/ML 方法
与非共价抑制相比,共价抑制具有许多优势,但必须仔细平衡共价弹头反应性,以保持效力,同时避免不必要的副作用。虽然弹头反应性通常通过化验来测量,但预测弹头反应性的计算模型对共价抑制剂设计过程的多个方面都很有用。研究表明,共价弹头反应活性与描述共价反应机理重要方面的量子力学(QM)特性之间存在相关性。然而,这些研究中的模型通常是线性回归方程,在使用时可能会受到限制。使用 QM 描述子预测共价弹头反应性的机器学习(ML)模型的应用在文献中并不多见。本研究使用按不同理论水平计算的 QM 描述符来训练 ML 模型,以预测共价丙烯酰胺弹头的反应性。QM/ML模型与基于相同QM描述符建立的线性回归模型以及基于摩根指纹和RDKit描述符等基于结构特征训练的ML模型进行了比较。实验表明,QM/ML 模型优于线性回归模型和基于结构的 ML 模型,文献测试集证明了 QM/ML 模型预测未见丙烯酰胺弹头支架反应性的能力。最终,这些 QM/ML 模型是有效的、计算上可行的工具,可以加快新共价抑制剂的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 生物-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design provides a form for disseminating information on both the theory and the application of computer-based methods in the analysis and design of molecules. The scope of the journal encompasses papers which report new and original research and applications in the following areas: - theoretical chemistry; - computational chemistry; - computer and molecular graphics; - molecular modeling; - protein engineering; - drug design; - expert systems; - general structure-property relationships; - molecular dynamics; - chemical database development and usage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信