Mir Saeed Yekaninejad , Nazi Derakhshanrad , Elahe Kazemi , Asal Derakhshanrad , Hooshang Saberi
{"title":"Influential factors for final neurorehabilitation outcome scores in patients with spinal cord injury: A longitudinal cohort study","authors":"Mir Saeed Yekaninejad , Nazi Derakhshanrad , Elahe Kazemi , Asal Derakhshanrad , Hooshang Saberi","doi":"10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Longitudinal prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the coefficient of efficacy and the influence of various demographic and neurological factors on changes in Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III) scores over time in traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Patient recruitment and evaluations were conducted at the Brain and Spinal Injury Research Center in Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was performed over an 8-year period in our outpatient rehabilitation setting. Changes in SCIM-III scores were assessed in 559 TSCI patients (of 1460 enrolled patients) who fit the inclusion criteria. All included patients participated in our outpatient rehabilitation program, which consisted of a multidisciplinary education program combined with occupational therapy, physical therapy, and home nursing as a rehabilitation package for a 6-month period. Patients then received follow-up assessments every 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Predictors of the SCIM-III score as a rehabilitation outcome tool, and of its change over time, included age (younger patients had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.067), marital status (married patients had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.031), education level (patients with university education had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.003), occupation status (employed patients had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.009), and neurological level of injury (patients with injuries at lower levels had better outcomes, <em>p</em> < 0.001). However, sex and injury severity as per the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) had no significant effects on functional outcomes (i.e., SCIM-III score changes over time).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Age, marital status, education level, employment, and neurological level all affected the final SCIM-III scores of SCI patients. By contrast, sex and AIS grade were not significant predictors of SCIM-III outcomes. Further studies that include additional factors may be useful for future SCIM-III models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","volume":"12 2","pages":"Article 100117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S232424262400024X/pdfft?md5=1d1f9684350af91e0f66ff7b9ab4539c&pid=1-s2.0-S232424262400024X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S232424262400024X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design
Longitudinal prospective cohort study.
Objectives
To assess the coefficient of efficacy and the influence of various demographic and neurological factors on changes in Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III) scores over time in traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) patients.
Setting
Patient recruitment and evaluations were conducted at the Brain and Spinal Injury Research Center in Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran.
Methods
The study was performed over an 8-year period in our outpatient rehabilitation setting. Changes in SCIM-III scores were assessed in 559 TSCI patients (of 1460 enrolled patients) who fit the inclusion criteria. All included patients participated in our outpatient rehabilitation program, which consisted of a multidisciplinary education program combined with occupational therapy, physical therapy, and home nursing as a rehabilitation package for a 6-month period. Patients then received follow-up assessments every 6 months.
Results
Predictors of the SCIM-III score as a rehabilitation outcome tool, and of its change over time, included age (younger patients had better outcomes, p = 0.067), marital status (married patients had better outcomes, p = 0.031), education level (patients with university education had better outcomes, p = 0.003), occupation status (employed patients had better outcomes, p = 0.009), and neurological level of injury (patients with injuries at lower levels had better outcomes, p < 0.001). However, sex and injury severity as per the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) had no significant effects on functional outcomes (i.e., SCIM-III score changes over time).
Conclusion
Age, marital status, education level, employment, and neurological level all affected the final SCIM-III scores of SCI patients. By contrast, sex and AIS grade were not significant predictors of SCIM-III outcomes. Further studies that include additional factors may be useful for future SCIM-III models.