Science teaching in BRICS: A systematic review of pedagogical approaches and challenges

Q1 Mathematics
A. Masalimova, Marina R. Zheltukhina, O. V. Sergeeva, N. N. Kosarenko, Dibakhan A. Tsomartova, Lyudmila M. Smirnova
{"title":"Science teaching in BRICS: A systematic review of pedagogical approaches and challenges","authors":"A. Masalimova, Marina R. Zheltukhina, O. V. Sergeeva, N. N. Kosarenko, Dibakhan A. Tsomartova, Lyudmila M. Smirnova","doi":"10.29333/ejmste/14434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As major emerging economies, BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are prioritizing advancements in science education to drive innovation and sustainable development. This systematic review synthesizes insights across 55 studies on policies, practices, challenges, and innovations in science teaching and learning in BRICS countries. The analysis reveals shared goals of enhancing inquiry-based, technology-integrated, hands-on pedagogies and improving teacher competencies. However, systemic constraints like large classes, limited resources, assessment pressures and lack of local contextualization persist, exacerbated by cultural barriers in countries like South Africa. Variations also emerge in research foci, with Brazil emphasizing content knowledge, China evaluating interventions, India highlighting teacher-student roles and South Africa targeting systemic challenges. While common reform directions are evident, tailored interventions responding to each nation’s unique developmental context are essential, given differing priorities. Developing context-specific solutions while collaborating to exchange best practices can enable BRICS countries to collectively strengthen science education. Cross-national comparisons reveal gaps in areas like cultural responsiveness, indigenous knowledge, and comparative outcome analyses that can be addressed in future research. As BRICS nations cooperate strategically amid shifting global paradigms, transforming science education by addressing systemic inequities and nurturing critical thinking is vital for developing talent and technological capabilities. Sustained improvements require reorienting assessment-driven structures towards creativity, curiosity and local relevance while considering cultural perspectives.","PeriodicalId":35438,"journal":{"name":"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","volume":"79 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As major emerging economies, BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are prioritizing advancements in science education to drive innovation and sustainable development. This systematic review synthesizes insights across 55 studies on policies, practices, challenges, and innovations in science teaching and learning in BRICS countries. The analysis reveals shared goals of enhancing inquiry-based, technology-integrated, hands-on pedagogies and improving teacher competencies. However, systemic constraints like large classes, limited resources, assessment pressures and lack of local contextualization persist, exacerbated by cultural barriers in countries like South Africa. Variations also emerge in research foci, with Brazil emphasizing content knowledge, China evaluating interventions, India highlighting teacher-student roles and South Africa targeting systemic challenges. While common reform directions are evident, tailored interventions responding to each nation’s unique developmental context are essential, given differing priorities. Developing context-specific solutions while collaborating to exchange best practices can enable BRICS countries to collectively strengthen science education. Cross-national comparisons reveal gaps in areas like cultural responsiveness, indigenous knowledge, and comparative outcome analyses that can be addressed in future research. As BRICS nations cooperate strategically amid shifting global paradigms, transforming science education by addressing systemic inequities and nurturing critical thinking is vital for developing talent and technological capabilities. Sustained improvements require reorienting assessment-driven structures towards creativity, curiosity and local relevance while considering cultural perspectives.
金砖国家的科学教学:对教学方法和挑战的系统回顾
作为主要的新兴经济体,金砖国家(巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非)正在优先发展科学教育,以推动创新和可持续发展。本系统性综述综合了 55 项研究对金砖国家科学教学的政策、实践、挑战和创新的见解。分析揭示了加强以探究为基础、技术整合、实践教学法和提高教师能力的共同目标。然而,大班教学、资源有限、评估压力和缺乏本地化等系统性制约因素依然存在,南非等国的文化障碍更加剧了这些制约因素。在研究重点方面也出现了差异,巴西强调内容知识,中国评估干预措施,印度强调师生作用,南非则针对系统性挑战。虽然共同的改革方向是显而易见的,但由于各国的优先事项不同,针对各国独特的发展背景采取有针对性的干预措施是至关重要的。制定针对具体情况的解决方案,同时合作交流最佳做法,可以使金砖国家共同加强科学教育。跨国比较揭示了在文化响应、本土知识和比较结果分析等领域存在的差距,可在未来的研究中加以解决。随着金砖国家在不断变化的全球模式中进行战略合作,通过解决系统性不平等和培养批判性思维来改革科学教育,对于培养人才和技术能力至关重要。要持续改进科学教育,就必须调整以评估为导向的结构,使其面向创造性、好奇心和地方相关性,同时考虑到文化视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education is peer-reviewed and published 12 times in a year. The Journal is an Open Access Journal. The Journal strictly adheres to the principles of the peer review process. The EJMSTE Journal publishes original articles in the following areas: -Mathematics Education: Algebra Education, Geometry Education, Math Education, Statistics Education. -Science Education: Astronomy Education, Biology Education, Chemistry Education, Geographical and Environmental Education, Geoscience Education, Physics Education, Sustainability Education. -Engineering Education -STEM Education -Technology Education: Human Computer Interactions, Knowledge Management, Learning Management Systems, Distance Education, E-Learning, Blended Learning, ICT/Moodle in Education, Web 2.0 Tools for Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信