Development of a Personalized Feedback Intervention Targeting Pain-Related Anxiety for Adults Reporting Hazardous Drinking and Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Andrew H. Rogers, Clayton Neighbors, Jaye L. Derrick, M. Zvolensky
{"title":"Development of a Personalized Feedback Intervention Targeting Pain-Related Anxiety for Adults Reporting Hazardous Drinking and Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Andrew H. Rogers, Clayton Neighbors, Jaye L. Derrick, M. Zvolensky","doi":"10.15288/jsad.23-00359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nAmong individuals with chronic pain, the rate of hazardous alcohol use is elevated compared to the general population. Yet, hazardous drinkers with chronic pain remain an underserved group. There is a need to develop and test alternative and complementary interventions to reduce hazardous alcohol use among this high-risk segment of the general population; targeting pain-related anxiety, a candidate mechanism, is one theoretically-informed route.\n\n\nMETHOD\nOur approach followed a staged model (1a/1b) to develop and test a novel personalized feedback intervention (PFI). Phase 1A collected qualitative feedback from (N = 9; 77.8% female, Mage = 33.86, SD = 8.75) participants to refine intervention content and evaluate treatment acceptability and feasibility. For phase 1B, individuals (N=118; 57.3% male, Mage = 35.24, SD = 11.90) participated in a pilot randomized clinical trial for our novel PFI compared to a health information control condition on alcohol use, intention/motivation to reduce drinking, pain-related anxiety, and expectancies for alcohol analgesia/pain coping for hazardous drinkers with chronic pain.\n\n\nRESULTS\nPhase 1a results provided support for the feasibility of using a PFI to target pain-related anxiety, and results from Phase 1b indicated that participants reduced drinking and primary outcomes changed in the expected directions, but there were no differential effects of the intervention.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe current data provide preliminary evidence for the utility of computer-based brief interventions to encourage behavior change. However, further refinement of the intervention to target pain-related anxiety is warranted.","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.23-00359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Among individuals with chronic pain, the rate of hazardous alcohol use is elevated compared to the general population. Yet, hazardous drinkers with chronic pain remain an underserved group. There is a need to develop and test alternative and complementary interventions to reduce hazardous alcohol use among this high-risk segment of the general population; targeting pain-related anxiety, a candidate mechanism, is one theoretically-informed route.
METHOD
Our approach followed a staged model (1a/1b) to develop and test a novel personalized feedback intervention (PFI). Phase 1A collected qualitative feedback from (N = 9; 77.8% female, Mage = 33.86, SD = 8.75) participants to refine intervention content and evaluate treatment acceptability and feasibility. For phase 1B, individuals (N=118; 57.3% male, Mage = 35.24, SD = 11.90) participated in a pilot randomized clinical trial for our novel PFI compared to a health information control condition on alcohol use, intention/motivation to reduce drinking, pain-related anxiety, and expectancies for alcohol analgesia/pain coping for hazardous drinkers with chronic pain.
RESULTS
Phase 1a results provided support for the feasibility of using a PFI to target pain-related anxiety, and results from Phase 1b indicated that participants reduced drinking and primary outcomes changed in the expected directions, but there were no differential effects of the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
The current data provide preliminary evidence for the utility of computer-based brief interventions to encourage behavior change. However, further refinement of the intervention to target pain-related anxiety is warranted.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.